SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Clinched

Created by: sharcuda22
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 14, 2024
Published: Apr. 14, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Draft: (1)Celebrini, (8)Buium, (38) Letourneau, (42) Marques
Off-season trades:
1.) I just saw a coyotes ACGM do it, and if you can get extra picks for that sure, why not.
2.) Move one of our goalies for one with a bad contract, for more assets (in this one im dreaming a little bit because i dont think seattle parts with goyette but the Musty connection is fun)
3.) Seek a 2-3 year center cap dump to play 3C.
4.) Cap dump rebound candidate, rinse repeat.
UFA/RFA Signings:
1.) Smith will be the big question, and he has all the control. If I am the sharks I am trying to sign him. I dont think he has anything left to learn at NCAA level, and the skill level isnt high enough to force him to build NHL habits like a pro league would be (cut towards center of the net, dont take plays off in D-zone). However, he may want to return to win a Natty with Letourneau and Hagens, I do believe he would have to play the whole year without Leonard too who also has the option of turning pro.
2.) Kunin provides something this team lacks, if you can sign him for a few years at a reasonable AAV i dont see why we wouldnt bring him back.
3.) It is very tempting to sign a UFA D-man but I think stick it out one more year and let all three pairs get 20ish minutes a night. If Emberson can stay healthy and Muk plays as a NHL dman that injects a lot of size into our back end (hockey will never beat the homoerotic allegations). Muk also helps us out with our transition issues if he can figure it out, we can always play vlasic if he needs nights off too.
4.) Zadina, Addison, Coe all have arguments to stay for one more year, but I dont think they get qualified. Out of all of them Zadina prolly has the best chance, but I would prefer trying to swap them for some Bona fide veterans. Peterson is going back to Sweden and Maki has been too injury prone that I would prefer Cooley be our number 3
5.) Snag the DUKE from Tampa.
6.) After Musty’s 9 games call up Guschin.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
2$800,000
2$1,025,000
3$1,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
2$775,000
2$775,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
Buium, Zeev
3$950,000
Letourneau, Dean
3$950,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2024 1st round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Weber, Shea
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (ARI)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (ARI)
ARI
3.
4.
SJS
  1. Copp, Andrew
  2. 2025 1st round pick (DET)
5.
SJS
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (PHI)
PHI
6.
SJS
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. 2025 1st round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (PHI)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the DET
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$81,083,810$0$1,307,500$6,616,190
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, C
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,900,000$5,900,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 14 at 9:51 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 315
Likes: 123
Flyers just gonna ride out Johansen contract. Doubt they pay anything substantial to move him.
sharcuda22 and Ujeje liked this.
Apr. 14 at 9:52 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: Gunmars
Flyers just gonna ride out Johansen contract. Doubt they pay anything substantial to move him.


TBH he was just a guy i could think of off the top of my head that wasn’t gonna play where he is type deal.
Gunmars liked this.
Apr. 14 at 9:52 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Yeah, Detroit ain't doing that lol.
Apr. 14 at 9:54 a.m.
#4
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,350
Likes: 10,680
Calgary keeps there pick
MoxNix and MyTeamsSuck liked this.
Apr. 14 at 9:56 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: RazorSeider53
Yeah, Detroit ain't doing that lol.

Enjoy more years of mediocrity with Compher and Copp as your matchup centers lol. I was thinking 1st + Copp = Sturm + Stephenson and you are making the playoffs next year instead of folding like a lawn chair like this year.

Quoting: Gmonwy
Calgary keeps there pick

Their*. I just chose a team where the draft pick value added up.
Apr. 14 at 9:57 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
Enjoy more years of mediocrity with Compher and Copp as your matchup centers lol. I was thinking 1st + Copp = Sturm + Stephenson and you are making the playoffs next year instead of folding like a lawn chair like this year.


Their*. I just chose a team where the draft pick value added up.


Pretty sure Danielson and Kasper will be our matchup centers. Thanks.

Apparently you don't know a plug when you see it.

Quoting: sharcuda22
Their*. I just chose a team where the draft pick value added up.


Is it worse to not know the difference between "Their" or "There" or "They're"... Or to be ignorant enough to think a single 2nd round pick makes up the difference between picks 8 and 14? tears of joy
Apr. 14 at 10:02 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: RazorSeider53
Pretty sure Danielson and Kasper will be our matchup centers. Thanks.

Apparently you don't know a plug when you see it.



Is it worse to not know the difference between "Their" or "There" or "They're"... Or to be ignorant enough to think a single 2nd round pick makes up the difference between picks 8 and 14? tears of joy


Look up any draft pick coefficient list. 8 is at 7.1 and 14 is 5.2 and 33 is 1.7. But keeeeeeeeep yappin
Apr. 14 at 10:03 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
Look up any draft pick coefficient list. 8 is at 7.1 and 14 is 5.2 and 33 is 1.7. But keeeeeeeeep yappin


Show me the historical trade where a 2nd round pick has gotten a team up 6 spots from the early teens to the late Top 10.

I'll wait.
Ansabch12 liked this.
Apr. 14 at 10:12 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
Look up any draft pick coefficient list. 8 is at 7.1 and 14 is 5.2 and 33 is 1.7. But keeeeeeeeep yappin


Better yet, tell me the last time a team in the top 10 did a pick swap?

I'll save you the time on that one. It was 2008...
Ansabch12 liked this.
Apr. 14 at 10:36 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,603
Likes: 8,220
Quoting: sharcuda22
Enjoy more years of mediocrity with Compher and Copp as your matchup centers lol. I was thinking 1st + Copp = Sturm + Stephenson and you are making the playoffs next year instead of folding like a lawn chair like this year.


Their*. I just chose a team where the draft pick value added up.


Copp and Compher weren't this teams problems. Copp has been quite good actually defensively. He might put up more points if he got more than 34% of his starts in the offensive zone. We aren't trading him and definitely not attaching a 1st this year. I like the idea of adding Sturm as a 4th line centre but not in any deal like this. We are also going to need him to help mentor Danielson and Kasper in the future.
sharcuda22 liked this.
Apr. 14 at 10:52 a.m.
#11
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 5,369
Quoting: sharcuda22
Enjoy more years of mediocrity with Compher and Copp as your matchup centers lol. I was thinking 1st + Copp = Sturm + Stephenson and you are making the playoffs next year instead of folding like a lawn chair like this year.


Their*. I just chose a team where the draft pick value added up.


You know copp has a NTC and is from Detroit and loves it there, so only way we are getting rid of it is by buying him out
Apr. 14 at 10:54 a.m.
#12
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
laugh Copp doesb't waive for the Sharks, And we sure as hell aren't giving up no 1st for Sturm who's value isn't worth anymore than a 3rd rounder.
Apr. 14 at 11:56 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: buffbry
You know copp has a NTC and is from Detroit and loves it there, so only way we are getting rid of it is by buying him out


Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh Copp doesb't waive for the Sharks, And we sure as hell aren't giving up no 1st for Sturm who's value isn't worth anymore than a 3rd rounder.


I agree with you on the value of Sturm for sure, the first is more about dumping Copp and covering the cost of Sturm. Copp has a MNTC not a no trade clause, that being said a bottom feed is prolly on his list as well as the Canadian teams. I think JGP from the islanders is another candidate.
buffbry liked this.
Apr. 14 at 11:57 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: Lancebmx
Copp and Compher weren't this teams problems. Copp has been quite good actually defensively. He might put up more points if he got more than 34% of his starts in the offensive zone. We aren't trading him and definitely not attaching a 1st this year. I like the idea of adding Sturm as a 4th line centre but not in any deal like this. We are also going to need him to help mentor Danielson and Kasper in the future.


This all makes sense, this was based loosely on an athletic article about squad compositions. I do think now is the time to start being ultra aggressive for the wings tho.
Apr. 14 at 12:00 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
I do think now is the time to start being ultra aggressive for the wings tho.


True. The Ottawa/New Jersey approach is working very well for Ottawa and New Jersey...
Apr. 14 at 12:00 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: RazorSeider53
Better yet, tell me the last time a team in the top 10 did a pick swap?

I'll save you the time on that one. It was 2008...


Oh noooooooo its only happened once ill definitely be sure to include that in my made up future team lmao. Sharks also did 11 for like 27,34,42 so again value wise it all checks out. I do not know what Calgary’s pool looks like, so this only makes sense if they need quantity over high high end quality, which im not sure is the case. I dont think they have a top pairing D in their system anymore, but Calgary just happened to be in the spot where the value lined up for the picks, I didn’t pick them for any other reason.
Apr. 14 at 12:03 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: RazorSeider53
True. The Ottawa/New Jersey approach is working very well for Ottawa and New Jersey...


I mean Jersey will likely be a playoff team again next year if they get bang average goal tending and will be a contender if they stay healthy next year and are in a VERY good place for the next 10 years. Ottawa is a different situation, but I think Detroit has a better composed squad. Ottawa and Jersey are very very different situations. I was just thinking Detroit would want to maximize Larkin’s peak years.
Apr. 14 at 12:04 p.m.
#18
arky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 6,716
Likes: 4,341
Quoting: sharcuda22
Enjoy more years of mediocrity with Compher and Copp as your matchup centers lol. I was thinking 1st + Copp = Sturm + Stephenson and you are making the playoffs next year instead of folding like a lawn chair like this year.


Their*. I just chose a team where the draft pick value added up.


This coming from a team that will be last for the next 6 years
Apr. 14 at 12:04 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
Oh noooooooo its only happened once ill definitely be sure to include that in my made up future team lmao. Sharks also did 11 for like 27,34,42 so again value wise it all checks out. I do not know what Calgary’s pool looks like, so this only makes sense if they need quantity over high high end quality, which im not sure is the case. I dont think they have a top pairing D in their system anymore, but Calgary just happened to be in the spot where the value lined up for the picks, I didn’t pick them for any other reason.


It doesn't check out value wise. You can keep telling yourself that 8 for 14 is the same as 11 for 27 though. tears of joy

Little tip on your pick value charts. Several of the people who made those charts used to grade the high end picks in the 10s or even hundreds of value. They moved to decimal grading because when people figured out that the charts are terribly inaccurate, being off by 4.2 points sounds a hell of a lot better than being off by 42 points.
Apr. 14 at 12:09 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
I mean Jersey will likely be a playoff team again next year if they get bang average goal tending and will be a contender if they stay healthy next year and are in a VERY good place for the next 10 years. Ottawa is a different situation, but I think Detroit has a better composed squad. Ottawa and Jersey are very very different situations. I was just thinking Detroit would want to maximize Larkin’s peak years.


Detroit's GM won the first of his three Cups at 32. The last team he managed had a Captain winning his first Cup at 30.

Doubt Yzerman is worried about Larkin wasting away before the team is competitive...
Apr. 14 at 12:38 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,485
Likes: 3,192
Calgary keeps the pick and depending on who's still available selects Tij Iginla, Carter Yakemchuk or Cayden Lindstrom.
sharcuda22 and Gmonwy liked this.
Apr. 14 at 12:38 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: RazorSeider53
Detroit's GM won the first of his three Cups at 32. The last team he managed had a Captain winning his first Cup at 30.

Doubt Yzerman is worried about Larkin wasting away before the team is competitive...


Idk if Yzerman has the injury record that Larkin has. But you want to capitalize on your best players years, and there are certainly many many players who are excellent past 31 but most athletes prime years 27-31. We’ll see
Apr. 14 at 12:39 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 552
Quoting: MoxNix
Calgary keeps the pick and depending on who's still available selects Tij Iginla, Carter Yakemchuk or Cayden Lindstrom.


Trade doesn’t necessarily need to be with Calgary that was just where the value of picks added up
Apr. 14 at 12:40 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 732
Likes: 313
Quoting: sharcuda22
Idk if Yzerman has the injury record that Larkin has. But you want to capitalize on your best players years, and there are certainly many many players who are excellent past 31 but most athletes prime years 27-31. We’ll see


LOL.
Apr. 14 at 12:49 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,603
Likes: 8,220
Quoting: sharcuda22
This all makes sense, this was based loosely on an athletic article about squad compositions. I do think now is the time to start being ultra aggressive for the wings tho.


I wouldn't say quite yet. We need a few more prospects to actually make it first. We only have 2.5 of Yzerman's picks on the team, that is not enough. Edvinsson is the 0.5 cause hes still fresh on the team. Once we get guys like Danielson, Kasper, Wallinder and Cossa on the team, then we could look at being buyers. But until we know what we got, we should be patient still. Doesn't mean we can't try to improve the team but being "ultra aggressive" likely isn't the best approach.
sharcuda22 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll