SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Draft to ONL

Created by: sharcuda22
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 23, 2024
Published: Apr. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Tankathon Results: Sharks at 3 and 14
1.) Get Levshunov and trade up if someone you like.
2.) Gonna trust the teal curtain on Couture’s injury.
3.) Mike is trying hard to get Smith to turn pro.
4.) Let Addison and Zadina walk. They had alright years but we have more important players to allow to push for offense and we need to make space for those that dont.
5.) Weaponize your cap space and others lack of
6.) Lundell is a pipe dream, no way florida lets him walk. But i firmly believe that is one of the reasons for making ACGMs they dont need to be 100% serious.
7.) What do we do about the defense :’(
8.) Musty will prolly get his 9 games, but after I would call up guschin or we should trade one of guschin or bords in a deal for top 3 RD. (Flames fans im so sorry I dont watch you or this guy so if this is way off im sorry.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,025,000
2$1,025,000
2$800,000
3$1,750,000
1$1,025,000
2$5,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Levshunov, Artyom
3$950,000
Goodrow, Barclay
2$775,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Fabbri, Robby
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (DET)
  4. 2024 4th round pick (DAL)
2.
SJS
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (SJS)
3.
FLA
  1. Vanecek, Vitek
  2. 2025 1st round pick (VGK)
4.
CGY
  1. Bordeleau, Thomas
  2. Chmelevski, Alexander [Reserve List]
  3. Emberson, Ty
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$70,760,000$0$1,307,500$16,940,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, C
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Goodrow, Barclay
$775,000$775,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 23 at 8:12 p.m.
#1
sharks88
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 351
Likes: 175
Unfortunately yes that's way off for Andersson.

I can see both teams declining that FLA swap.
Apr. 23 at 8:15 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 553
Quoting: sharksdoee
Unfortunately yes that's way off for Andersson.

I can see both teams declining that FLA swap.


TBH i dont see why the sharks dont. We get a player that is perfect timeline for the rebuild and is better than we would get with the first (unless vegas explodes in the offseason).
Apr. 23 at 8:21 p.m.
#3
sharks88
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 351
Likes: 175
Quoting: sharcuda22
TBH i dont see why the sharks dont. We get a player that is perfect timeline for the rebuild and is better than we would get with the first (unless vegas explodes in the offseason).


Only because Knight could be a gamble, but with upside of course.

Lundell seems to be a very good 3C, but especially if SJ gets the #1, C won't be a pressing need and same with LW which are the positions he could play. Rather see that Vegas 1st put to use drafting or trading for a RHD. In the end I wouldn't hate the trade though as I think the values great and it could end up working out very well for SJ. But also can't see FLA doing it with Bob's age and Lundell's key 2-way play for them.
Apr. 23 at 8:23 p.m.
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Det, FLA and CGY all laugh and pass, None of those offers are remotely close. Sturm isn't worth more than a 3rd rounder at best.
Apr. 23 at 8:34 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 553
Quoting: MoSeider53
Det, FLA and CGY all laugh and pass, None of those offers are remotely close. Sturm isn't worth more than a 3rd rounder at best.


That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree
Apr. 23 at 8:38 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 545
if FLA moves on from Knight they will keep Lundell as they will have the cap, Knight isn't a negative asset either, he is only 22, and Lundell to Florida is probably worth a ton. No way this gets it done, especially with the fact that Vanecek is going to them (so they don't even save cap space)

Not sure about the Calgary one, but I don't think it really makes sense for SJ anyway
Apr. 23 at 8:38 p.m.
#7
RecycleShark
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 956
Likes: 267
Andersson would be a great addition, but it would take more to get him.

I'd gamble on Knight, but not for a 1st.
Apr. 23 at 8:42 p.m.
#8
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Quoting: sharcuda22
That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree


Dude obviously isn't a true Red Wins fan, because we're not giving up assets for Fabbri and Holl. Not sure how many times we need to mention that Holl is a cheap buyout candidate.
Apr. 23 at 9:09 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 479
Likes: 236
Quoting: sharcuda22
That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree


Holl's not really much of a negative asset when his buyout is peanuts.

Yeah nobody's giving **** for him or even taking him for free... But Detroit ain't paying a premium to dump him either.
Apr. 23 at 9:13 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 8,221
Rather buyout Holl and give Fabbri and maybe a third for Sturm.
sharcuda22 liked this.
Apr. 23 at 11:07 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,729
Likes: 12,063
Quoting: sharcuda22
That trade was proposed by a Red Wing fan… holl is a big negative asset and fabbri is borderline neutral…

FLA and CGY tho im not gonna disagree


Holl's buyout is cheap Detroit buys him out before paying to move him.

Fabbri had 18g - 14a - 32p in 68 games while averaging just under 13 minutes a game.

Only Zetterlund had more goals with 24g. He played 82 games and averaged just under 19 minutes a game.

Along with Zetterlund, Eklund and Granlund had more points but they had a lot more ice time.

He is probably borderline neutral to some teams but SJS isn't one of them. Fabbri would make SJS a better team without a doubt.

I'm not saying SJS should take this deal but Fabbri is quite easily better than Sturm.
Apr. 24 at 6:06 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 553
Quoting: aedoran
Holl's buyout is cheap Detroit buys him out before paying to move him.

Fabbri had 18g - 14a - 32p in 68 games while averaging just under 13 minutes a game.

Only Zetterlund had more goals with 24g. He played 82 games and averaged just under 19 minutes a game.

Along with Zetterlund, Eklund and Granlund had more points but they had a lot more ice time.

He is probably borderline neutral to some teams but SJS isn't one of them. Fabbri would make SJS a better team without a doubt.

I'm not saying SJS should take this deal but Fabbri is quite easily better than Sturm.


I will only say that Sturm is a more important player for the sharks than fabbri would ever be. Why does fabbri only get 13 minutes a night? Are there just other players ahead of him?
Apr. 24 at 6:07 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 553
Quoting: RecycleShark
Andersson would be a great addition, but it would take more to get him.

I'd gamble on Knight, but not for a 1st.


The first is for lundell, im not sure knight has much value at the moment but he is certainly a good rebound candidate.
Apr. 24 at 6:09 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
sharcuda22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 553
Quoting: MoSeider53
Dude obviously isn't a true Red Wins fan, because we're not giving up assets for Fabbri and Holl. Not sure how many times we need to mention that Holl is a cheap buyout candidate.


Quoting: DanielSan92
Holl's not really much of a negative asset when his buyout is peanuts.

Yeah nobody's giving **** for him or even taking him for free... But Detroit ain't paying a premium to dump him either.


Quoting: Lancebmx
Rather buyout Holl and give Fabbri and maybe a third for Sturm.


I get that. IMO Sturm is worth a third, so if we took out Fabbri (who i also thought was neutral asset at best but wings could better spend the cap my b) and the fourth. Would you do holl and second for Sturm?

Then the instead of holl being an expensive dump he is essentially trading up 1 round to dump him and then Sturm for the “third”
Apr. 24 at 8:21 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 8,221
Quoting: sharcuda22
I get that. IMO Sturm is worth a third, so if we took out Fabbri (who i also thought was neutral asset at best but wings could better spend the cap my b) and the fourth. Would you do holl and second for Sturm?

Then the instead of holl being an expensive dump he is essentially trading up 1 round to dump him and then Sturm for the “third”


I've made that trade before. I don't hate it.
sharcuda22 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll