I'd rather have Terry at 7 million vs Marner at 12

Because most people don't make fair trades. You're Anaheim one is a good example. The retention alone is worth a 1st plus.

Because there is no fairness in these trades especially

That Anaheim trade is so bad for the Ducks. Would rather have Terry at 5 mil cheaper and a steady d-man

No one is paying a 2nd for Jarnkrok

Not sure the value breakdown on the Timmins, McCabe and Kampf but don't see anyone paying a 2nd for any of them

Not to mention Fowler has a 4 team trade list 🤦‍♂️

Because most people on the form don't know hockey and over/under value players based on the team the play for

and instead of explaining their thought and providing a better or alternate solution they post something with no value that is equal to their hockey knowledge

Also adding Marner resigns doesn't increase his trade value. There has never been a UFA with 1 year remaining on his deal that's been signed and traded. So they're really only trading for 1 guaranteed year of him.

The Maple Leafs fans on this site seem to be the most irrational of all the fanbases Shanaplan...

There just so many of them that you see them more,

1 in 10 AGM's posted by Leaf's fans is rational. The rest are - "we don't want this player anymore but should get massive/irrational returns for them though"

I would definitely take this as a ducks fan

Hey man, nice to have a new Ducks fan on here.

That said, any retention on Terry’s 6 years left is out of the question, and any trade with Fowler going to TOR wouldn’t happen because he’s veto it with his 4 team trade list.

All that said, I’m not convinced that I’d prefer Marner at $12M compared to Terry at $7M. In a vacuum it’d be close, but when we’re going to have to give a contract to our entire young core in the next 2 years, I’d prefer not to have a $12M anchor