SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fresh ideas

Created by: fangm
Team: 2024-25 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 6, 2024
Published: May 6, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,000,000
2$7,000,000
1$4,500,000
3$3,000,000
2$2,500,000
3$5,500,000
1$4,500,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Lamoureux, Maveric
Additional Details:
Slight upgrade from a B- to B+ prospect for Toronto. Utah gets a marketable name at a discounted price. Tavares had 65 points in 80 games still by far better than any Arizona C. This allows them to ease Geekie and Cooley in instead of rushing them and gives them a veteran C who can likely be a 3C for years to come. Seems like a low risk trade for Utah that could significantly improve their prospects development.
ARI
  1. Niemelä, Topi
  2. Tavares, John ($4,000,000 retained)
2.
3.
TOR
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,355,000$0$850,000$345,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$13,250,000$13,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,500,000$11,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
UFA - 3
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 6 at 11:19 p.m.
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,959
Likes: 25,759
Edited May 6 at 11:24 p.m.. Reason: corrected error
"Fresh Ideas"?!?!? That's hilarious!! This is the fourth time today, and the NINTH time this month, that you've proposed the ridiculous inclusion of Brandt Clarke in a trade to Toronto (8 times for Marner and once for Nylander), and on each of the earlier occasions, received unanimous opposition to the idea of including Clarke in ANY trade.

But go ahead. Just put your head down and ignore every single reaction you get. It's a horrible, terrible, no-good, horrible idea for the Kings, but you don't want to listen to what you don't want to hear.
CoachCoach liked this.
May 7 at 12:29 a.m.
#2
Former NHL Executive
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 718
Likes: 162
Quoting: OldNYIfan
"Fresh Ideas"?!?!? That's hilarious!! This is the fourth time today, and the NINTH time this month, that you've proposed the ridiculous inclusion of Brandt Clarke in a trade to Toronto (8 times for Marner and once for Nylander), and on each of the earlier occasions, received unanimous opposition to the idea of including Clarke in ANY trade.

But go ahead. Just put your head down and ignore every single reaction you get. It's a horrible, terrible, no-good, horrible idea for the Kings, but you don't want to listen to what you don't want to hear.


Having worked for Rob I can say with 100% certainty he would accept this deal if it was offered and Marner came with an extension of 4-8y at $11.5M or less.

It would immediately erase the PLD disaster, buy him another season as GM and solve the RHD problem he has.

Kings fans genuinely have no understanding of the game. You can't have Doughty, Spence and Clarke as your RHD. None of them are solid enough defensively and all of them will take time away from each other in offensive situations.

I think Kings fans so don't realize how much power guys like Kopitar/Doughty have. They are a large reason for the Fiala/PLD moves which were completely unnecessary in an attempt to accelerate the rebuild.

Doughty doesn't want Clarke there and today the organization rather put Clarke in the AHL, press box or third pair than risk upsetting Doughty by giving Clarke real minutes.

So in short if you think this trade wouldn't be accepted I'd highly recommend taking some time to learn more about the game and the business. It's has to be one of the least educated and most absurd takes you can have. I'm quite certain many analysts have done their mock Marner trades and many have Clarke coming back to Toronto in an LA trade.

You sir aren't smarter than people who do this for a living.
fangm liked this.
May 7 at 6:15 a.m.
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,959
Likes: 25,759
Quoting: Rajvinder
Kings fans genuinely have no understanding of the game.

Nothing could illustrate your utter lack of insight better than this idiotic generalization, and betray your total unfitness for a position in any hockey operation. Thanks for revealing yourself.
CoachCoach and ClarkeForNorris liked this.
May 7 at 12:12 p.m.
#4
Former NHL Executive
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 718
Likes: 162
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Nothing could illustrate your utter lack of insight better than this idiotic generalization, and betray your total unfitness for a position in any hockey operation. Thanks for revealing yourself.


I've sat in the arena more times than you ever will. The lower bowl is largely Canadians who moved to Cali and the Kings are their second team.

The rest of the fan base is largely fair weather.
fangm liked this.
May 7 at 6:52 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
Doughty doesn't want Clarke there and today the organization rather put Clarke in the AHL, press box or third pair than risk upsetting Doughty by giving Clarke real minutes.[/quote]

Doughty literally said yesterday in his exit interview that “he sees a lot of himself in Brandt Clarke and he’d love to sit down and watch video with him to help his defensive game.”

The idea that Doughty doesn’t like Clarke is absurd.
OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll