SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

AnalyticsGeek

Pens were the best
Member Since
Sep. 30, 2019
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
2nd Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
5011
Posts per Day
3.0
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 12, 2020 at 7:03 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 6:03 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 6:00 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 2:13 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 2:11 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 2:10 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 1:36 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 12:02 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 12, 2020 at 11:59 a.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 3:41 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 3:39 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 3:02 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RomanovTheAnswer</b></div><div>I have been saying this for the last three years and I still believe it is relevant today: Leafs need to win NOW.

Not to suggest that the Leafs have an aging core, ticking away at their strengths, they're not old. The four elite players are all at great ages. Though with nearly 40m in four players, plus being in a Toronto market, you can't expect these elite guys to continue to 'trust the process' at this point in their careers. So, in conclusion to that point, the hourglass is filling as seasons go by without playoff success; Marner or someone else will HAVE to be moved. Which would only set TOR back.

In my opinion, Dubas did a very moderate job at improving the D. Yes, on paper and most likely on the ice, this d-core SHOULD be better than last season, but at the competition level the Leafs are at now, the d-core needs more. I bet it wasn't Dubas' first choice, but Brodie isn't the guy who is going to reset the entire narrative of the Leaf's D-core. Leafs need someone strong, trustworthy, and defensively sound. Reilly is what I like to call sub-elite, a top 25 defenseman in the league no doubt. Plus, you got a rising star in Sandin. What is in common between the two? Both severly offensive. Reilly is not Karlsson offensive, where the two-way play in miniscule, but rather offensively minded. You need to supply him with a Weber type guy; a Pulock, Ristolainen, Parayko, etc. A slower, simpler defenseman with no risk.

One thing a lot of Leaf fans are failing to address is the possibility that Simmonds sucks, Thornton is washed up, Bogosian is useless at the NHL level, Spezza's time has finally ran out, and Vesey is equally disappointing as he was in NY. These aspects COULD WEIGH THE SUCCESS OF THE TEAM DOWN. Though, luckily for Leaf fans, there's some decent NHL level depth with the addition of fairly exceptional AHL depth. Barabanov is looking like a solid bottom 6 guy (for this season and next, could be top 9/top 6 guy one day), and he is just one of the fairly unnoticed AHL guys who could really support this Leafs team effectively.

If I was Dubas, depending on the first month and half of hockey, depending on the teams performance I would be actively shopping Marner and Nylander to get a proven RHD, or at least a prospect and many picks. I would commit to the development of Mac Hollowell because he is a small, puck-moving RHD who isn't rough and tough but extremely trustworthy with the puck on his stick along with decent-to-immense offensive upside (VERY dependant on rate of development). I would see what I could do to move Tavares if they can't make it first round, what a terrible signing.</div></div>

Thanks for the feedback, all good points. I do think that even if the team fails to win the cup, they have to at least win a couple of rounds. That way the core will be motivated to keep playing together.

Brodie is a decent 2 way defenceman but you are right, he processes the game a little too carelessly at times especially when he has the puck. I’m surprised they didn’t offer sheet Pulock considering he only signed for the same amount as TJ.

I definitely think it’s fair to be skeptical of the depth pieces. Most of those guys are old, others unproven. There’s no guarantee that they will be a good fit. I guess we’ll have to find out soon.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 2:57 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 2:55 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>I tend to agree with you. My biggest concerns for the Leafs going forward are still A.) toughness (mental and physical) and B.) Depth.

I don't think the Leafs need to have a Maroon or Reaves or etc... I think they need guys like Tavares/Marner/Nylander to step up in the playoffs. Your top guys need to be willing to block shots, be heavy on the forecheck, and most of all put in more EFFORT on the backcheck. Columbus was a FAR less talented team, but they out worked the Leafs.

To me, Depth is a huge issue for this team. It's not even that the Leafs don't have depth. It's that they choose not to use it. The Leafs can't ride Freddie as hard as they did last year. I know he had a lot of rest between the stoppage and the playoffs, but this upcoming season will be crammed together. For Leafs fans...I hope upper management forces "load management" onto the coaching staff. Get Campbell or Hutch/Dell some games. IMO they're the same as Campbell. Make sure Freddie is fresh for the playoffs. Also, for all the injuries the Leafs had last year...they couldn't find just one single game to call Bracco up?!?! He's 23 with zero NHL games. Just try him out. Give another winger some rest.</div></div>

Thanks for the feedback. I think it’s too much to ask for guys like Tavares, Marner &amp; Nylander to go to the dirty areas, win puck battles &amp; backcheck. As skilled as they are, they are too lazy &amp; one dimensional to change. That’s why the GM brought in guys like Hyman, Mikheyev, Barabanov, Engvall, Vesey, Anderson, Simmonds &amp; Thornton. All those guys are feisty &amp; hardworking, maybe they’ll set an example for the stars. I would’ve loved to get Maroon. I really wanted the Leafs to sign him, Clifford &amp; Martin.

I agree with your take on Andersen.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 2:50 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lyle_Bubas</b></div><div>i just think if andersen has a bounceback and if we can get a backup goalie that posts above an .900sv% we can be solid.

People arguing simmonds is washed up forget that they were watching an injured simmonds playing 15 minutes a night at $5M AAV trying to score 20-30+ goals. For us he's literally a 4th liner, prob plays 11-12 minutes a night. and I also think the leafs medical staff has the potential to work wonders with him. I was reading the other day how spezza has said that he's actually able to do sprints again, and that the leafs sports science team basically rejuvinated him and helped him achieve things he thought he'd never do again. We did it with ennis, we're doing it with spezza, maybe simmonds can be a home run as well

thornton has 5g 11p in 10gp in switzerland right now - he can definitely still play hockey, esp if he's a 3C with limited minutes, sharing that role with kerfoot or engvall

vesey legit I think is scoring 20 goals this year, idc what people say, he played on some offensively destitute teams and produced 15-17 goals. he was also one of like 3-4 players that weren't minuses on buffalo this year, scoring 9 goals with literally no powerplay time. give him the odd shift with matthews, stick him on PP2 with thornton and lehtonen and I think he does it.

I could be very wrong, and we'll see, but I am quite optimistic</div></div>

Damn I had no idea that the Leafs’ science team was that good. If that’s the case, I definitely think they can get rejuvenate Simmonds a little bit &amp; turn him into that nasty intimidating bottom 6 Forward. I agree with you on Thornton.

I heard Vesey &amp; Kerfoot had really good chemistry at Harvard, so maybe they will play together at the start of the season. I’m definitely interested in seeing Vesey play on the wing with Matthews. He’s a big guy, has decent possession metrics on a bad Buffalo team &amp; can win puck battles in the dirty areas. Maybe in a top 6 role he’ll be a bigger poorer version of Hyman.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 2:42 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 2:33 p.m.
Forum: Toronto Maple LeafsDec. 11, 2020 at 2:30 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Alfie11</b></div><div>Really not a fan of their forward depth after Kapanen and Johnsson got dealt. Outside the big 4 and Hyman, nobody has scored 20 goals in the last two seasons, and Simmonds is the only one to score 20 in the last 4. They are gritty, but they’re also slow, not really defensively strong, and won’t produce much offensively as I mentioned. If one of their top lines gets shut down or goes in a slump they’re basically done, there’s very little secondary scoring. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is something Dubas tries to address at the deadline, get a guy like Coleman, underpaid 3rd liner with 20 goal potential.

Adding Brodie does make their defense look a lot better, they actually have a good player on the right side and the best partner Rielly has ever had (assuming he plays there), and Rielly-Brodie-Muzzin is a top 3 that’s actually comparable to other elite teams, so that’s good. 3rd pair is an enigma but it’s fair to assume two of Sandin, Lehtonen, Dermott, Bogosian, and Liljegren step up.

Overall I think they’re about net equal probably a little better, they’ve improved defensively and are built to do a bit better in the playoffs (theoretically), but at the expense of any sort of scoring support. Likely a decent improvement considering they’ll get a full season out of Campbell, so Andersen should bounce back and be in the top 10 goalie conversation again with a more solid defense in front of him and more rest. I think they’ll finish somewhere in the top 3 in Canada alongside Calgary and Edmonton. We’ll see if the added grit helps them go further in the post-season or if the lockdown style of playoff hockey is their undoing due to their lack of depth.</div></div>

Thanks for the feedback. I think Kapanen and Johnsson were excellent players, but their skill sets didnt make them a great fit in the team’s bottom 6. They were more useful as complimentary / scoring players in the top 6.
This year’s bottom 6 wingers (Mikheyev, Engvall, Vesey, Barabanov &amp; Simmonds) are more of the feisty hardworking types who will win puck battles to maintain possession on the cycle. Historically, their defensive stats have been quite good as well. I feel given how the top forwards are all about finesse &amp; skill, they need more of these types to support them.