DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
7
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
BallPuckFellow10
Member Since
Aug. 28, 2020
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1143
Posts per Day
0.8
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Toronto Maple Leafs
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:22 p.m.
Thread:
Is Mitch Marner Overpaid
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leaflet</b></div><div>Good effort putting all this argument together.
I don't dispute that Marner is the highly talented winger you describe. Most people don't. But I still think it's a bad signing. And I'm not saying this with the benefit of hindsight: I was saying the exact same thing before the contract was signed and the pandemic started! Many reasons.
- If the AAV price was about 11M during negotiations, higher than any winger in the league, management had to bridge. That's what most Canadian GMs did, rightly so. The reasoning is that even after the bridge and without COVID, the AAV for wingers would have increased to the level his agent was asking for, at best. So, you gain cap space for 3-4 years.
- Psychologically, it's not desirable for a young player not named McDavid to become the highest paid player at his position (nobody is at McDavid's level). Too much pressure. I said that before: exceeding expectations always feels better, more motivating. Maybe the blame is other people's greed. But if Marner had a 9M AAV right now, nobody would have a negative thing to say about him. It would feel great for him.
The last playoffs are a good example. Keefe played him 25 minutes a game. It's like he was saying: you wanted that contract, now deliver. The reality is, however, this level of ice time is well beyond optimal.
In short: you can spoil the development of young players by raising the bar too high, too soon. Mitch throwing the puck in the stands is not him failing the fans. It's the people around him who failed him in his development, from his agent to the GM.
- You mentioned the PK several times. It's great. I like defensively reliable players, too. But to be frank, Marner should not play on the PK in the first place. Other players can do it, and fill that role with the same efficiency, if not more. Being a reliable defender at even strength is more than sufficient for Marner. Unless you change the entire system of the team, and become like Boston. But the Leafs aren't Boston. With regards to special teams, his focus should be the PP.
- Rantanen, Kucherov are comparables. Rantanen doesn't fill the same defensive role, but he has physicality and a better goal scoring touch. That's worth something. Kucherov is at another level entirely: his play under pressure and intense coverage is unparalleled. The way Tampa supported his development was exemplary. They went step by step, and of course, he was bridged. In fact, both players are better managed, because they have realistic expectations. And their cap hit is about just right.
With all that said, I like your attitude. I'm tired of cap discussions anyway, especially after the fact, since we can't change that anymore. So it may be better to see the glass half full.</div></div>
Firstly, I have to say that the way you constructed your response is exemplary. An extremely great read with some very valid points that you backed up nicely with facts. I can't really dispute much you said as it all makes sense, but I have some things I want to discuss.
I have to say that your point regarding bridging Marner makes sense the more I think about it. If his contract expired next summer, he would be paid the exact same amount as he is paid now, So for these 3 years if he was bridged around $7.5-$8M, we would have had some extra cap space to play with. I really didn't think about it that way before you mentioned it.
Secondly, I do disagree with your opinion on the contract putting too much pressure on Marner. Since his draft year, Marner has not been anything other than a stud. He even had an excellent rookie campaign in the OHL almost hitting a ppg while actually doing it in the playoffs for the London Knights, a team that is known for making their young talent have to work and earn that spot in the top six. He did it in his rookies year with players 4 years older than him. His draft year he was the best player on the team when there still was players 3 years older than him. Max Domi who was picked 12th overall in the draft 2 years earlier, was outshone by Marner. We don't even have to talk about the season after his draft year, the numbers a pure comedy, especially in the playoffs. He already had all that pressure built on him when entering the league and still managed to produce an excellent rookie season in the NHL (61 points in 77 games). He survived that kind of pressure, in addition to having Mike Babcock as a coach who at stretches played Mitch on the 4th line. He showed to me at least that he wasn't the kind of player that gets fazed when the pressure builds up. I think he has proven since then that he can handle pressure very well. Somebody has to be the highest paid player on their position, why can't it be Mitch, from a psychological perspective?
While playing him 25 minutes a game in the playoffs is a little bit ridiculous, I don't think Keefe was wrong in riding him and Matthews. They are our two best players without question, and I want them on the ice as much as possible, especially in the playoffs. What I would question is why Nylander is playing more than 7 minutes less, the difference between the two isn't 7 minutes a game different. I didn't view it as Keefe saying ''you wanted that contract, now deliver.'' In my view, it was more of a ''please, bail me out here, I don't know what to do.'' I do like Keefe as a HC, but he couldn't really adapt to JT going down, in a series we were up 3-1 in without him. I don't think Mitch has got too much too soon, I think that is the media narrative around him. From what I have read and seen, he seems like a very humble young man that works extremely hard to improve at a sport he already is one of the greatest currently active at playing it. He never comes off as rude, selfish, childish, spoiled or ignorant that you would link to someone that has got too much in life too early on.
At one point, I would completely agree with you and not have Mitch Involved with the PK anymore. I think it was a waist of his energy and would negatively impact his offensive impact. But, if you look at his production levels during the regular season, he has been on 90+ point pace the least 3 season with the most recent season having a pace for 30 goals and 100 points. This idea I am about to present doesn't have anything statistically to back it up with. It is more of a hunch that I have. I believe Marner is one of those players that just feeds of being involved in the game at all the time, it almost is as if he doesn't have enough time to sit down and think about what is happening, he can sort of just ''feel'' the game if that makes sense to you at all? His hockey IQ is actually through the roof, he must surely be in the top 10 of players in the league with the highest hockey IQ, something I would think defensemen and players that play in the middle would top. My point is that, by playing him in all situations, which won't make you worse at a team at all due to his high intelligence will only benefit him and you as a team, because he almost always impacts the game in a positive way, by making the right play or the impossible play that us casuals could only dream of executing. I wonder if the Leafs ever would give Marner and Kerfoot a chance to play together shorthanded. Their IQ's are of the chart's. I think they could expose some power plays that aren't sharp. Not suggesting that they would lead the league in shorthanded points, but it would also not surprise me.
I love Mikko Rantanen as a player and he has some skills that Marner don't. Like you said, his physicality and goal scoring touch should definitely be something that you take into consideration. However, respectfully, I don't think Marner and Rantanen are on the same level. Both of them play with players generally considered in the top five in the league so they both play with phenomenal players and on phenomenal teams. Rantanen will probably score 40 goals at some point in his career, and Marner will likely have a season with 30. However, I doubt Rantanen will ever be able to develop into a player that can dominate every single situation the game throws at him, just like Marner can. I think that people overlook the defensive side of the game too much. I am not saying that you are one of those people, but defense is 50% of the game, so I think it should be worth mentioning when a player is among the best at both facets of the game.
With respect to Marner, he is not on Nikita Kucherov's level. I like that you pointed out the way that they developed him. Kucherov as a player coming from a complete different hockey culture, continent was someone that Tampa likely knew was going to be fragile if he was put under too much pressure too soon. Frankly, the same thing applies to Rantanen that also played I the AHL before making the jump. I don't think Marner needed that, he was from the local area he was going to play in, he knew all about the pressure and the history of the team. I could honestly not think of another player that could have handled everything as well as he has done. Obviously Matthews helps to shoulder the burden as well, and he is just special as pressure doesn't affect him as well either.
At the end of the day, I think Marner will prove all his critiques wrong. I am not saying that the Leafs will win a cup, but he will at some point have a crazy playoff run which will make all of this forgotten. He is just too good of a player not too, Same applies to AM34.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 8:06 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>UBS_ARENA</b></div><div>I dont. Massive weak spot at 3C. This team is based on depth not top end talent so you cant get by with an ok 3C. You need a top player there. Also a team like this could use a guy like vasilevskiy to take the pressure of a solid but not amazing group of skaters. If you swap sissons for JGP (or someone like him) and demko for vasi, this team has a great chance. You also have the cap for those swaps.</div></div>
Great points! I just wanted to try some different players here, but those two absolutely make sense!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 8:05 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>UBS_ARENA</b></div><div>Yes that much is certainly true. But what burkie doesnt say in this book is how impossible this team is to build bc ypure always going to have that prospect (nyi its dobson, tor its sandin and so on) that has the skillset of a top 6/top 4 player but isnt at that level. So they dont fit the bottom of the lineup bc their skillset is totally different but they also dont have the talent to play at the top of the lineup.</div></div>
That is an excellent point. The ''only'' logical thing for me is that GM's should let the young guys take as much time as possible to develop before they ''throw'' them into the depend. I like how Detroit did it a few years back when they always seemed to have guys ready to step in from Grand Rapids and play for the big club. Tampa seem to be doing that now with Syracuse as well.
I think we as fans maybe have a role to play in all this with all the pressure we have to see this young talents. It might make the players think they are ready or the coaches/GM's think they are ready when they not are. I would like to think that front offices don't listen to media pressure, but crazier things have happened.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:57 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JackAce91</b></div><div>It really does. It looks like it is a perennial cup contending roster, but it looks like it's missing something. Not sure what it is, and it could just be due to looking at all the other Burke challenge rosters, but they all seem like they're not quite there.</div></div>
I completely get where you are coming from here. It is kinda hard to picture it in your head, but I do really think this team would be a cup contender in this years NHL season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:56 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JackAce91</b></div><div>This is pretty interesting. I usually don't equate Burke with success, especially anything recently (that I'm aware of), but it is definitely interesting to see how he builds his team. I'd love to see other gm's opinions on this, like Stan Bowman, Lamoriello, Sakic, or Yzerman.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>UBS_ARENA</b></div><div>Ill say 1 thing. It looks damn similar to the islanders of the past couple of years.</div></div>
I think what would make this work is that everyone has their specific roles to fulfill. It is not like on some teams when you have guys on the third/fourth line with limited skill trying to play a game they don't have the ability for. This team is balanced with players that are confident in their abilities while their role also matches their play style. While there are some things from Burke's philosophy that might be a little weird or outdated, I think the base pretty much is there for a cup winning team. He won the cup with the Ducks so obviously he knows what it takes. I always loved listening to him on TV and when my friend let me read his book I was so happy when I found this segment. Also makes me a little sad as a Leafs fan because this is very far from how our roster is constructed :/
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:49 p.m.
Thread:
Brian burke challenge
Wow, insane team!
Obviously a complete elite squad when you have guys like Nate, Couturier, McAvoy, Werenski, Toews and Hellebuyk. My only ''critique'' would be that you have too many players that regularly play in bigger roles than what they are doing for your team here. For example Couturier could be your 1C and Toews 1LD. I might not have specified that in the ''rules'' so that is my fault and not yours.
Thanks for taking on this challenge! Great job!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:45 p.m.
Thread:
Burke Challenge
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SevenLeg</b></div><div>BallPuckFellow10 I tried to include different players from yours and I had to put some Habs in there lol.</div></div>
Great team! Only issue I have is that Smith is on an ELC, and I didn't include any ELC's in mine, but you are obviously completely free to do what you want. Thanks for taking on this challenge, excellent job!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:41 p.m.
Thread:
Brian Burke Team
Really solid squad this! Probably exactly what Burke would build in an ideal world. My only critique would maybe be that you have Weegar on the 2nd pair when he generally is considered a first pairing guy, but that is just me being harsh. Great job mate!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:39 p.m.
Thread:
Burke Team Build
Nice Job! Really solid squad. Could see this team go all the way to be fair. Burke would probably be proud lol!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:37 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BallPuckFellow10</b></div><div>GoHabsGo99 , Matthewsfan , SevenLeg</div></div>
<a href="/users/UBS_ARENA" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@UBS_ARENA</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:37 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BallPuckFellow10</b></div><div>A_k , villenash , evelutions2
Here is my V2. Thanks to all of you for taking on this challenge! You guys have been doing an awesome job and I really enjoy looking at your teams!</div></div>
<a href="/users/GoHabsGo99" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@GoHabsGo99</a> , <a href="/users/Matthewsfan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Matthewsfan</a> , <a href="/users/SevenLeg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@SevenLeg</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:37 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<a href="/users/A_k" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@A_k</a> , <a href="/users/villenash" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@villenash</a> , <a href="/users/evelutions2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@evelutions2</a>
Here is my V2. Thanks to all of you for taking on this challenge! You guys have been doing an awesome job and I really enjoy looking at your teams!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:32 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Roysboy72</b></div><div>All you have to do is type an and then somebody's username, it automatically creates a link with no hassle.</div></div>
Perfect, thank you so much!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke V2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Roysboy72</b></div><div>6 in a row, look at that.
<img class="for_img" src="https://i.imgur.com/hQ0VvDr.png" alt="hQ0VvDr.png">
But seriously, thanks for creating this idea BallPuckFellow10</div></div>
Haha that is awesome! I just read about it last night and thought it would be really cool to implement the idea into ACGM lol. Thanks for the shootout! Much appreciated.
Stupid question, but how do I tag someone on a post lol :squinty
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 7:24 p.m.
Thread:
Brian Burke Team Eve2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>BallPuckFellow10</div></div>
Nice team. Only issues I have is that I didn't use any ELC's (Suzuki) in my team, and I also tried to match players roles in real life to what they would be here. Suzuki isn't a 3C, Chychrun isn't a 2nd pairing defenseman and Bortuzzo most certainly isn't a 2nd pairing defenseman.
Thanks for taking on this challenge, great job!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 6:47 p.m.
Thread:
Burke Challenge
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>villenash</b></div><div>BallPuckFellow10 Tried to not use any players you had already selected. This was definitely not an easy challenge -- kudos. I wasn't able to hit all the points for each position, but something like 90% of the way there lol</div></div>
Wow, great work!
This is definitely a more workmanlike roster that would enable us to see if Burke's philosophy could be successful. The addition of Hintz is very nice I must say. Top Skill, size (not blue collar) and has the ability to finish (no pun intended). Same goes to Comtois as well. I am currently working on V2, will let you know when it is done.
Thanks for taking your time to do this. Again, awesome job!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 6:30 p.m.
Thread:
re do the off season
And you are keeping Ceci? Interesting. My personal opinion is that he isn't a top 4 defenseman in the league. He was fine on Pittsburgh's 3rd pair last year and that is exactly what he is. I think he will be exposed just like he was in Toronto and Ottawa, playing top 4 minutes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 6:20 p.m.
Thread:
Brian Burke Build - AK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>I thought it was really odd the way he has a specific type for LW vs RW (and he wants a RHS 3C). Same with LD and RD. Not sure how what his logic is there, unless he liked to design specific breakouts/set pieces that only work on one side of the ice? Idk</div></div>
I know, I would imagine that it could be flipped so that LW had the RW duties, same on the defense pairings as long as each line/pairing had what he wanted. As for the RHS 3C, I would imagine it being something he wants if the team doesn't have any RHS on any other line, or he simply wants to be able to have one bottom six C that is a RS and the other one a LS for face-off purposes late in the game.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 6:11 p.m.
Thread:
Brian Burke Build - AK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>It was fun. I don't feel like I got a perfect fit for every spot, and I definitely went after the top-end guys where I could, so I bet if I re-worked it I could find better picks for the descriptions. The guys I really wanted in there but couldn't fit were Tuch, Wilson, Cirelli, M Foligno, Rielly... definitely some guys that Burkie would have out there.</div></div>
I am probably going to do a v2 soon and Wilson and Cirelli are probably two players I would include. If you end up doing a re-worked version, let me know, would love to see it!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 6:05 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>villenash</b></div><div>If Trouba can get back to the same level he was a few years ago and Colton has a good 2nd season (the two biggest question marks for me), then I think this team would be a top contender.</div></div>
According to the numbers I look at, Trouba rebounded nicely this season after a rough first year in NY. I think their top 4 is going to be solid for so many years to come with potentially adding Lundqvist/Schneider to the mix as well. Colton is probably the biggest gamble on this team, and he could probably be substituted out for someone else. I like his upside and I believe he went 2-0 in PS this season as well which fits the criteria nicely.
Would love to see your take on this if you have the time/desire to complete this challenge yourself.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 5:59 p.m.
Thread:
Brian Burke Build - AK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>BallPuckFellow10 Decided to make a team real quick, Burkie loves his bruisers</div></div>
Nice team! Obviously dream scenario with having a top five player in the league in Draisaitl, a top 5 goal scorer in Pastrnak, ROR who is a 1st line C playing 2nd line here and Lowry who is a 3C playing 4C. I looked at many of these players as well including Bennett, ZAR, NAK, Parayko, Marino and Mayfield.
Have to say that Bratt is a ice addition for that PS role. I completely forgot about him. Nice pick!
Thanks for taking on this challenge. I appreciate your work!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 5:48 p.m.
Thread:
Rakell Deal
Thanks for the offer, but I think the Leafs pass.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 5:24 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>villenash</b></div><div>It's definitely a downgraded team in terms of talent, but also feels like a more realistic one. The first one was basically the pinnacle of the Burke method, and this feels like a Burke method team in reality. Still a solid squad.</div></div>
No you were 100% right. I think I got too caught up in getting the best players available with great contracts into certain roles they don't play. I think every player I have selected now better represents the Burke method and what role they play in real life. I reckon this team could win the cup, what do you think?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.
Thread:
Anaheim Ducks 21-22 Projected Roster
I would imagine both Zegars, and Drysdale make the team this year. Comtois was the Ducks top scorer so I don't really understand him being scratched either. Deslauriers is 100% not a top 6 RW. That is my input.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 13, 2021 at 5:09 p.m.
Thread:
Building a Team According to Brian Burke
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Where are Phil Kessel and Bobby Ryan</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>villenash</b></div><div>I mean, yeah, this is a good team. But at the same time, you have arguably the 2nd best player in the NHL, the 2nd best goalie in the NHL, one of the top 3 goal scorers in the NHL, and three number 1 defenseman. And all of the players I'm referring to make less than $7.5m each (some much less). The team is stacked more because of the players + contracts you selected, as opposed to going by Burke's thoughts -- in my opinion.</div></div>
Made some adjustments. What do you think now?
First
3
4
5
Next
Page 4
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com