DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Bast
First round bust
Member Since
May 24, 2023
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
2nd Favourite Team
Carolina Hurricanes
Forum Posts
890
Posts per Day
2.5
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 6:33 a.m.
Thread:
Wings
I think that's a fair deal for CGY.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 6:30 a.m.
Thread:
2024 Outline
I would be fine with the trade if you retain $1.5M on Pageau.
Otherwise, I'd rather keep Mangiapane until the TD, unless he can fetch a 2nd with retention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 4:08 p.m.
Thread:
Help
Take away Wahlstrom and Pageau from the Sharangovich trade, and it would be more likely IMO.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 4:04 p.m.
Thread:
Reshuffling
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>StutzlesNumber1Fan</b></div><div>Calgary fans will love this</div></div>
Hehe, it seems we're just everyone's farm team on capfriendly.
I don't see the Flames going in that direction. Markstrom is most likely traded, and it would likely be for picks and prospects.
Andersson might be traded, it would be good asset management, but it seems unlikely in this offseason.
Weegar is here to stay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 3:55 p.m.
Thread:
In Depth Next Steps
I doubt the Flames will retain salary in a Vladar trade. More likely retention candidates (if traded): Mangiapane, Markstrom, Kuzmenko, Sharangovich.
The Flames might also flip a guy with retention... either a UFA they sign to a 1 year deal, or if they trade for a guy like Orlov in the offseason.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 11:35 a.m.
Thread:
Flames Retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>athrin</b></div><div>OTT declines chych has more value than a 34 yo G that has maybe 2-3 years left at being average.</div></div>
You clearly didn't watch our average goalie this year. You also probably don't put too much stock in <a href="https://evolving-hockey.com/stats/goalie_standard/?_inputs_&std_gl_table=%22On-Ice%22&std_gl_team=%22All%22&std_gl_str=%22All%22&std_gl_adj=%22Score%20%26%20Venue%22&std_gl_range=%22Seasons%22&std_gl_span=%22Regular%22&std_gl_group=%22Team%2C%20Season%22&std_gl_age1=%2217%22&std_gl_age2=%2250%22&std_gl_dft_yr=%22All%22&std_gl_status=%22All%22&std_gl_info=%22No%22&std_gl_players=null&std_gl_fa=%2250%22" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">goals saved above expected</a> where Markstrom is 3rd.
I don't mind you preferring Chychrun, I just find it funny that so many people are taking shots at Marky here, as though it would affect his actual trade value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 11:27 a.m.
Thread:
I have no ideaComment PLEASE
PLD sucked on most of his teams during his first season, then he rebounded.
The buyout on PLD is also a lot friendlier since he's less than 25, and there are a alot less signing bonuses. This results in 1/3 of his salary being on the cap, essentially $1.1M for 14 years + ~$11M bonuses spread over the first 5 years. I could be slightly off on the numbers, but you can look them up.
Which is why I would jump all over that deal if I'm the Flames.
PS: that's without even considering that PLD is paid $2M less, is 5 years younger, and has produced the same numbers over the last 2 years combined.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 10:21 a.m.
Thread:
Blow up
I'd take that Flames trade without the extension so we can flip him with 50% retention. I think Marner making $5.4M would bring back more than 1st + 2 x 2nds.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 8:29 a.m.
Thread:
Bye Bye Marner for good
NM.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 8:28 a.m.
Thread:
Bye Bye Marner for good
Flames accept, assuming we don't trade Marky.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 1:52 a.m.
Thread:
Sober Trades
I see the Markstrom trade as Markstrom for a 1st and a bunch of throw-ins that don't add any value.
Markstrom is worth the late 1st, with retention he's probably worth a mid 1st, or a late 1st + 2nd.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 3:43 p.m.
Thread:
Offseason
You had me at a 2nd for Bread.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 1:42 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs wo marner
I think it's a decent return for Markstrom, especially without retention.
That said, the most Tre gave up for a goalie here was a 2nd(Kyrou) for Elliott.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 1:32 p.m.
Thread:
Elite
That's a pretty good package. I'd probably take it. I would probably try and replace Rosen and Johnson with one of the big 3: Benson, Savoie, and Kulich, but that's wishful thinking probably.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 11:17 a.m.
Thread:
Big CGY trade sets up big UFA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DanielSan92</b></div><div>It’s a good thing Yzerman’s not dumb enough to sell firsts for 34 year olds when almost his entire core is still U23 and not in the NHL. 😂
Your ownership probably should’ve taken that first when NJD was offering it, instead of foolishly thinking they could compete if they kept Markstrom.</div></div>
He's just dumb enough to sign Chiarot to that anchor of a contract. The same applies to Vrana, Holl, Husso, and Maatta. I guess that's why you guys are trying to dump those contracts on us.
Didn't Stevie Y, the Wizard, trade for Nick Leddy? Didn't he move up so he can draft Cossa ahead of Wyatt Johnston? That Hronek kid is also doing alright on the first pairing in VAN, but at least you have 36 y.o. Petry as a replacement.
But hey I guess our ownership is stupid for not taking a hypothetical trade. In which Holtz was rumored for retaining 9M on Markstrom, not a 1st.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 9:49 a.m.
Thread:
Big CGY trade sets up big UFA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaquille_Oatmeal</b></div><div>Okay, which player would you rather keep as a Flames fan Matt Coronato or Markström?</div></div>
I can keep both so that's a moot point. Obviously, we're headed into a rebuild, so Coronato has a much better chance of helping the team in 3+ years. Markstrom's benefit would come in mentoring Wolf, and potentially increasing his ceiling, which I won't be able to gauge. Markstrom is also going to be the better player than Coronato in the next 2 years, so he will contribute to more wins and points in the standings(which we don't need).
As for Detroit, if you're still rebuilding, then sure keep your prospects, however if you're looking for players that will help you win this year then Markstrom is worth more to you than a 20% chance on someone better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 8:23 a.m.
Thread:
Big CGY trade sets up big UFA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaquille_Oatmeal</b></div><div>Just ignoring that there is pick #15 included? I'm definitely not trading a potential Anton Silayev/Liam Greentree/Michael Brandsegg-Nygård for a 34y old goalie. Think about it from the Red Wings perspective - Husso & Holl can be bought out for cheap and Määttä holds little value still. Just need to do a little bit of Cap gymnastic and we can make it work.
When was the last time we saw an old goaltender get a Top 20 pick + a decent young player in return?
Why would a rebuilding team trade for a goaltender who isn't even here when we're truely competing?</div></div>
Not ignoring it, it's a decent pick and I think Markstrom alone is worth it.
Taken 15th from 2003-2018: Denisenko, Brannstrom, Kunin, Senyshyn, Larkin, Pulock, Ceci, Miller, Forbort, Holland, Karlsson, Plante, Helenius, O'Marra, Radulov, R. Nilsson.
There are 3/15(20%) great players - Karlsson, Miller and Larkin. And another 2/15(13%) I would be pretty happy with as draft picks/return for Markstrom - Pulock, Radulov. The other 10/15 are mostly busts and replacement level.
Until those players make an impact in the NHL they're just names on a page.
Taking Berggren for 3 cap dumps isn't something I'm too keen on.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 7:00 a.m.
Thread:
goated
Replace the WSH 1st and the 2nd with OTT's 24' 1st and you have a deal. Otherwise I have no appetite for taking on that Korpisalo contract, and the $16M attached to it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 5:35 a.m.
Thread:
Kings
I think this favors the Flames due to the buyout on PLD coming at a favorable <a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/buyout-calculator/pierre-luc-dubois">1/3 ratio</a> which comes down to $1.1M for 14 years + 11.5M in signing bonuses.
Huberdeau on the other hand has mostly bonuses, so his contract is buyout proof.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 1:43 a.m.
Thread:
Big CGY trade sets up big UFA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DanielSan92</b></div><div>Not trading our first for an old as **** goalie lol.</div></div>
Not trading a top goalie for a bunch of overpaid spare parts in: Holl, Husso, and Maatta. All these guys are dime a dozen and can be had for less in free agency.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 1:39 a.m.
Thread:
Weegar
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dekes</b></div><div>I feel a top 4 mid 20s shutdown dman, an AHL PPG 22 yr old and a 3rd isn’t that bad of an offer.
Calgary is gonna want to try and compete soon so I feel and NHL trade is most likely</div></div>
Okay, but which direction is CGY heading with that trade? Carlo is a good #4, but if we're trading Weegar we wouldn't be competing any time soon.
Merkulov is also 23, and is far from a sure prospect. We've had plenty of guys put up his numbers in the AHL, that couldn't produce in the NHL. The 3rd gives the Flames about a 5% to draft a good player and about a 1% chance of it being someone better than Weegar.
Weegar is here to stay, and IMO a trade for Weegar should start with your team's top prospects and 1sts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 1:27 a.m.
Thread:
Next Year
How about something like:
Andersson for Schmidt + Lambert + 1st 25' + 2nd 24'(MTL)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 2:07 p.m.
Thread:
dubois
First of all, I think that PLD will rebound, he always has a first bad year. That said, even if he's back to form he would entrench the Flames in the mushy middle.
Moreover the Kings would be sending us assets with PLD.
Based on the season end interviews I fully expect Zary to play as a sheltered 3C next year. Unless the Flames sign one of Duchene, or Henrique on a short term(< 3 years) contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Tweaks
First of all I think Ehlers is awesome, but I would hate that trade for the Flames.
We're paper thin on D- we only have Weegar and Andersson as top 4D. We'll likely be adding one more D to support the likes of Miromanov and Kylington.
Pospisil also brings some piss and vinegar that the Flames are lacking, and he's fast. He really drags this team into games.
If we're trading Andersson I would prefer to see a package of futures and prospects, because we have more than enough forwards under contract, and not enough spots for the young guys.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 1:45 p.m.
Thread:
Calgary - 2024-25 - Off Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>In your eyes Bast what does retention price look like? I am just trying to gauge what CGY fans see as the value.</div></div>
It's very hard for me to gauge because I've seen Marky play great for the entire season. That said, he was terrible in the last year under Sutter.
I see something like Markstrom (50%) + VAN 24’(29th) for NJD 24'(10th). Or simply Marky for a mid first perhaps.
Other Flames fans value him more. I also think that he had the most value in the middle of this season for 3 seasons of Marky at $3M... I would've expected a good young player + 1st for that.
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com