BlastyRocks Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 25 at 4:09 p.m.

Thread: Markstrom

WTH is that Markstron trade ??- and it wasn't even done by a Flames fan!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 24 at 11:16 a.m.

Thread: Athletic trade ideas for goalie

I would also do it from a Flames perspective!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22 at 5:26 p.m.

Thread: TDL 2024 edited

You want Lindholm and Tanev (with retention) you had better be prepared to part with Lambert!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 22 at 5:24 p.m.

Thread: Buh buy Kuz

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Vancity2196</b></div><div>Canucks don’t want Mantha.
WSH-VCR trade rumour is way too old, and it won’t happen.
Calgary has no interest in Mark Friedman.
SJ can accept the last trade.</div></div>

If they are prepared to give us a 1st for Tanev we don't care about Friedman. A first on its own is the highest we could possibly expect - no way we are getting that and a decent prospect!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 18 at 6:38 p.m.

Thread: Offers for Lindholm

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>evelutions2</b></div><div>For the Canes, I could see them being interested in a reunion with Lindholm. That being said, the only way they even entertain Lindholm is if he is guaranteed to come with an extension, one that the Canes would realistically be willing to pay out (something along the lines of 6-8 years about 6-7mil). If Lindholm stands pat on wanting 1C money as a high end 2C, Canes have no interest. And if it’s acquiring Lindholm as a rental, they aren’t going to spend big assets like 1sts and top prospects for him to play 1/4 of a season.

As for an offer, assuming the above extension is in place, how about 24’ 1st, Ponomarev or Drury (Flames choice), TDA (for cap reasons if necessary; if not necessary then remove), Gunler, and any D prospect not named Morrow or Nikishin.</div></div>

If he was prepared to take that kind of $ then Calgary would have already signed him!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 5:31 p.m.

Thread: Leafs fans worst nightmare

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Vancity2196</b></div><div>Calgary accepts.
In my mind, Lindholm could be a good fit for Boston.
Why is Bergeron on the Boston roster?
He's already retired.</div></div>

Lol Cgy accepts says the Vancouver fan

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 5:29 p.m.

Thread: Lets get Spicy

Sorry Boston - you simply do not have the draft / prospect capital to go big game hunting at this year's TDL.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 5:27 p.m.

Thread: Another TDL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mynameisliang_</b></div><div>Lambert isnt being moved even if Lindholm extends. I would do Lucius and the picks for a rental, though.</div></div>

If it ends up being Lucius - the picks will change to a 1st - minimum

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 3:38 p.m.

Thread: Avs playoffs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NotSatire</b></div><div>I think the Flames need to add here if they are getting a 2nd, 3rd and a cap dump in Johansen. Maybe they add either Zary or Coronato?</div></div>

Hey don't forget the highly touted undrafted Ben Myers! Probably need to add both of them!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 17 at 3:26 p.m.

Thread: Would you do this trade

Avs would never do that unless the first was going the other way! And maybe not even then!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 6:01 p.m.

Thread: TDL Moves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TMLBRIAN</b></div><div>I would say swap Behrens for a 1st</div></div>

Obviously I would love that but unless they are for sure resigning Lindholm I think that that might be a little too pricey for Colorado!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 5:54 p.m.

Thread: TDL Moves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xqb15a</b></div><div>Swap Ritchie for a 1st</div></div>

I think if that was the offer Calgary would look at other potential partners because Behrens is just not that appealing of a prospect and there is another year of RJ's salary they are eating.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 11:20 a.m.

Thread: TDL CUP

Having had both players we will gladly keep Gilbert thank you!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 11:17 a.m.

Thread: Chyc for Andersson

Or maybe Calgary resigns Hanifin for the same $ Chycrun will command, and keeps Anderson and his low cap hit for the next 2 years!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 15 at 3:10 p.m.

Thread: Going For It At The Trade Deadline

Thank God - Just what the Flames are looking for - a fourth Goalie at $4.5M a year and a 33 year old UFA #7 defenseman!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 15 at 3:06 p.m.

Thread: Next year with Weegar

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gmonwy</b></div><div>That doesn't get Weegar</div></div>

What he said!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 12:06 p.m.

Thread: Calgary fans would this make sense

Ya not sure why everyone is so "concerned" about Weager's contract - we aren't! I wouldn't trade him straight up for Chabot - much less add Zary in the mix!!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 10:56 a.m.

Thread: Perry and Tanev

It is immaterial - Calgary would take that deal even if it is the Oilers!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 10:49 a.m.

Thread: Something

I will Keep Anderson every day of the year over Chychrun thanks!

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 10:47 a.m.

Thread: TDL AVS Landeskog comeback in the playoffs

I would suggest dumping RJ to the Flames and removing Olausson so the trade is RJ, Ritchie and a 1st for Lindholm

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 12 at 10:41 a.m.

Thread: some tweaks for the stretch run

<em>Bruins can't really give up a ton of draft capital for rentals and might look to add some pieces for the playoffs but won't make the same TDL splash as last season.</em>

Then the Bruins will need to lower their sight a little on who they wish to aquire at the TDL

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4 at 4:36 p.m.

Thread: Retooling

No one is paying a 2nd for Dube right now - and this is coming from a Calgary fan!

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2023 at 12:50 p.m.

Thread: stanley cup champions

Not with that goaltending duo!

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2023 at 12:43 p.m.

Thread: Playoff Reinforcements 2324

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stevo989898</b></div><div>Oilers say yes.</div></div>

No ****e they do - All they have to do to shed the Campbell contract is to trade a project player and retain $1M. It is Calgary and especially NJ who say no to this one!

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 12, 2023 at 12:04 p.m.

Thread: Whats Steve cooking

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AquaticOwl</b></div><div>CGY literally rescinded that contract offer after their garbage start, and you're insane if you think Hanifin is getting a 1st and the Wings top prospect. His return won't be more than Chychurn's.</div></div>

Chychurn's return was a first and 2 seconds - this is essentially a second + 2 B prospects as well as taking on $3M in Cap for an additional year in Matta - not really very appealing!

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

BlastyRocks

Beanmachine

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day