SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Hackadart

Official Leafs Fan
Member Since
Nov. 8, 2018
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
2nd Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
971
Posts per Day
0.5
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 31, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mytduxfan</b></div><div>All TOR prospects are “elite” prospects, even ones that have regressed since their draft *cough* Liljegren *cough*... *cough* still has top pairing potential *cough*



BUF says “no”. When will TOR fans get the message that middle 6 wingers that don’t drive the play don’t net top 4 D-men?



You’re underselling Manson. Liljegren isn’t that good. His ceiling is well-below what Manson has achieved and his skill set isn’t nearly as desirable. Also, TOR fans love talking about how Manson “regressed” since being on arguably the most dominant shutdown pairing in the NHL, but the skirt over the fact that Liljegren has regressed too and clearly doesn’t have the upside they originally thought. The kid hasn’t even sniffed an NHL ice and is already falling short of expectations and we’re supposed to be grateful that he’s included in a deal for our best RHD. Get real! Keep him and we’ll keep Manson.



Kase + Sprong + Perry’s cap hit + 2nd for Nylander. That 3 assets for 1 so you win, riiiiiiigggggghhhhhtttttt? Duuuuhhhhh! Such nonsensical TOR fan logic.</div></div>

Lol I was just chirping him for not know what asset management is, and saying Liljegren has regressed shows you have never watched him play, he has worked hard on his defensive game and he is now legitimately good defensively while also putting up 26 points in 35 games (also progress not regression) from the blue line... also he has played an NHL game so yes he has sniffed NHL ice, seriously this post just shows how little you know for how much you talk