DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
HockeyGawd
I Am Score
Member Since
Feb. 6, 2022
Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
57
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 2:28 p.m.
Thread:
Cheap All In TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Just_A_Guess</b></div><div>Carrier = 2nd
Carrier + retention + cap back with an extra year = 1st</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Just_A_Guess</b></div><div>Carrier = 2nd
Carrier + retention + cap back with an extra year = 1st</div></div>
Didn’t need retention as I corrected myself in the Brown trade. Carrier is also expiring.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 2:28 p.m.
Thread:
Cheap All In TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>If NSH can swing a Barrie trade, they'll need their final retention spot for him - not Carrier.
With NSH retaining and having to take Ceci, this isn't a good deal for the Preds. They should easily be able to get a 2nd for Carrier, without retaining or taking a less than desirable contract back.</div></div>
Oh yeah I’m aware. That’s why I corrected myself with the Brown trade because we didn’t actually need to retain on Carrier if we just dumped Brown.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 10 at 10:18 a.m.
Thread:
Sacrifices must be made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_random_sens_fan</b></div><div> Oilers probably accept if you keep Timmins</div></div>
They don't. Desharnais is the other half of one of the league's best 3rd pairing. Unless you blow Edmonton away with an offer, he's not getting moved.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 10 at 10:13 a.m.
Thread:
Sellers at TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AntiAnalytics</b></div><div>Sabres aren’t trading Mitts</div></div>
Sportsnet: On Friday’s “32 Thoughts” podcast, Elliotte Friedman talked about Mittelstadt’s contract situation. He believes Mittelstadt would not be happy not to get a lucrative new contract when several other teammates did. “If you’re not going to pay him, you almost have to move him.”
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 10 at 2:28 a.m.
Thread:
Only Acceptable Guentzel Trade with EDM
That's practically 3 1st rounders for half a season of Guentzel. Idk about that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 12:45 a.m.
Thread:
The price for Nick Dowd just went up
May I ask how Dowd's price went up? I'd want the Oilers to trade for Dowd so I'm kind of curious to know why
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 12:18 a.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gretzkyghosts</b></div><div>Ceci has the lowest corsica for and the highest 5v5 GA% of ALL OILER dmen.
Buffalo does not need a defender worse than Cliffton who does hit as often as Conner.
Buffalo passes, please look for another team on which to dump him.</div></div>
Ceci is having a down year, yet he still has a better on-ice shot attempts against than per 60 than Clifton, Dahliin, Power, and Johnson. The same xGA as Power and better than Clifton and Johnson. Nonetheless, Ceci would be a better partner for Power than Jokharju is. But if you really believe he isn't, then that's fine. Agree to disagree.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 12:04 a.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>And with his 12 team no trade list i doubt he even waives for Edmonton.</div></div>
Guentzel has griped about not wanting to go through a rebuild/retool. Which means he wants to win. He'll absolutely waive for any contending team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 12:00 a.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUF10</b></div><div>Dahlin plays his on right side, Jokiharju will get resigned and they are stuck with Clifton for another 2 years no room.</div></div>
So the Sabres D core doesn't need a heavy veteran Dman and they're satisfied with keeping the D core the way it is after this season's performance? Idk about that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 11:55 p.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>Broberg is a bust and Janmark and Savoie have next to no value. Other teams would offer far better value then this.</div></div>
He isn't. he still has that potential and still an elite skater, otherwise teams aren't calling Holland for him. If you give me reasons how he's a bust other than "Idk, he just looks like one", maybe I'll believe you
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 11:53 p.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Ceci doesn't make sense for the Sabres, stop it</div></div>
It literally does lol. He's a heavy shutdown dman that's also a veteran. Capable of playing in top 4. You don't think that young Sabres D core needs someone like that? Well, good luck that D core then because it ain't looking so great.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 11:46 p.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Gardoki</b></div><div>I mean, a 1st + 2nd + Prospect is probably close to what Jake would get. I think the other possibility is a good young player currently playing instead of a prospect. The issue for EDM is their prospect pool is pretty awful and teams probably offer better futures.</div></div>
Yeah thats the problem. Our prospects are having a rough first years in the AHL after ripping up their respective junior teams. But yeah, if it comes to a prospect-off, we're not winning the bidding war.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 11:44 p.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Gardoki</b></div><div>Realistically, Jake isn't going anywhere, but as far as Jake offers go, there's something to this one at least. I'm not sure how I feel about Broberg; he looks to be a bust territory, but I don't think we're far off here.
I think if you swapped out Broberg for a different prospect we're getting close.</div></div>
Broberg isn't a bust at all. He's not the 8th overall pick that he was made out to be for sure, but not a bust. The Oilers just haven't utilized him/given him the chance by playing him as a 7th D with only 8 mins every night. Currently cooking the AHL. There's still a top 4 D there, just not on the Oilers and he has much better upside than Hunter Brus-something which is who I compared to in the Lindholm trade because that trade kind of sets the market for players like Guentzel. If that isn't enough, I guess we'd have to throw in Bourgault over Savoie.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 11:39 p.m.
Thread:
The Clapback after Lindholm trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pritpalsodhi</b></div><div>dubas doesn't want ur junk!</div></div>
It's similar to what Lindholm fetched, that's what I was referencing for this trade. Except the conditional 4th upgraded to a 2nd to make up for the gap. Probably Bourgault over Savoie if Pens want a better offer or something.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 11:45 a.m.
Thread:
full speed ahead on the tank
I’ll give forgive you for the Desharnais trade because you did say you didn’t know anything about him. But no, he’s definitely, definitely, worth way more than a Riley Kidney lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 11:42 a.m.
Thread:
TDL DUB
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>klassic</b></div><div>Every time someone's trade is declined, "What do you mean you say no? I am sending you awesome players, and all I want is your trash player with a bad contract." Then why are you trading for that player? </div></div>
This isn’t my post lmao. I’m definitely not wanting to trade for Murphy
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 4:26 a.m.
Thread:
Jiricek Jenner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>Oh my god we're back to the Jenner discussion too.
It's absolutely missing another 1st and high end prospect. Arguably it's missing a 1st and <em><strong>A</strong></em> high end prospect, on top of Bourgault.
Jenner = 1st, 2nd, A-level prospect. Anything less and we'll just keep our 2C captain on one of the best deals in the league, or at least find another team.
(You really think Colorado, a team exactly one 2C and a backup goalie from the closest thing we've seen to hockey perfection in a while, wouldn't absolutely launch a 1st, 2nd, and Ritchie out the door for 3 cracks at a Cup with Jenner at $3.75M, especially if it means a team like Edmonton doesn't get him?).
Jiricek = Top-5 pick or U23 1RD. Anything less and we'll just keep our guy who will absolutely be 1RD before he's 23.
(You really think Toronto, a team with a dire need for cheap RD, wouldn't absolutely launch a 1st, 2nd, Cowan, +++ out the door to have Jiricek on his ELC for 3 years, and likely forever after that?).
Lets get real here. We've got enough middling prospects and filler players. We need quality, and we have that in Jenner and Jiricek. If you're getting <em>both</em>, you're sending us Draisaitl.</div></div>
Jenner for a 1st, 2nd and an A level prospect? Bro, Chicago got less for 40 goal scorer DeBrincat from Ottawa and that's nearly what Eichel's return was lmao. That's a crazy thing to say. He's defintely only worth a 1st, maybe a 2nd (probably a 3rd), and a B level prospect. This is Boone Jenner, not Mark Schiefele.
But you're right about Jiricek's value, yeah. I also never said he's going go to Edmonton for that value, but I thought you were implying that he fetches a 1st and a high end prospect when Jiricek is only a high end prospect, not a generational one. So if a high end prospect is in play, all you're going to get is a 1 for 1 or maybe a sweetner along with the high end prospect for Jiricek. Why would anyone need to give up more than that. It's a high end prospect for a high end prospect.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 11:01 p.m.
Thread:
Jiricek Jenner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>:laugh Jarmo Kekalainen :laugh and blocks Ken Hollands number, Not even close for both Boone jenner and David Jiricek. You're at least missing another 1st round pick and high end prospect.</div></div>
It is absolutely not missing another 1st and a high end prospect lol. A 1st+ for Jenner is enough. A high end prospect would just mean a 1 for 1 for Jiricek. He isnt generational enough to get more than a 1 for 1 with another high end prospect lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 10:21 p.m.
Thread:
Holland TDL Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>Sure it was. He has a history of paying 1st+ for good players with term, irrespective of their age. That was a classic Holland move.
However, he has NEVER traded a 1st for a rental. Ever.
And he's had Ceci play 1st pairing for 3 years now, and when he's making just $3.25M you don't give that away for a 3rd.
And while he may go for Duclair, he won't add Janmark to the offer. Janmark is playing very good defensive hockey and has a key role on the PK.</div></div>
Good point on him never trading a 1st for a rental but they could always be signed. Tanev is a nice asset and aging so he's not going to ask for a raise.
Ceci is a 2nd pairing D. Ekholm-Bouchard pairing has been the 1st pair ever since Ekholm came. If he can get more for Ceci, ****ing great. But it's mostly just to get rid of the 3M because in his words, its "dollar in, dollar out"
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 9:43 p.m.
Thread:
Holland TDL Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>None of these are Holland moves, sorry.</div></div>
The Ekholm trade wasn't either but here we are
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 9:02 p.m.
Thread:
TDL DUB
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Foegele is a pending UFA. He has no value in a trade to the Hawks. If he had term still, then sure, different story. And the Hawks keep Murphy over Ceci hands down.</div></div>
They could still flip Foegele at the same deadline for a 2nd easily. If not, he'd be a great winger for Bedard because he's a dogg, he'll do the dirty work for him. And the hawks would also accept a Ceci for Murphy trade in a heartbeat. Both players are pretty much the same but Ceci has a year less on his deal, cheaper, and doesn't have an NMC like Murphy does.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 8:59 p.m.
Thread:
new year same dreams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>That's literally not true. 🙄
Clearly try again. 😬</div></div>
It is. Idk if you're being sarcastic but it's literally reported by NHL insiders and even Blues guys on twitter aswell.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 8:58 p.m.
Thread:
Oilers 2024 Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Friendly_Cannon</b></div><div>Reputation is a big thing in this archaic league. Sadly</div></div>
It is but not on players who are on expiring deals. Lindholm's retention doesnt have any value
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 8:47 p.m.
Thread:
new year same dreams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>More Parayko trades. 😬
I don't think the Blues are moving him.</div></div>
It's been reported for like a whole week now that St Louis is literally exploring trades for Parayko. So they're clearly looking to trade him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 8:43 p.m.
Thread:
TDL DUB
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks easily decline. Hall is out for the year, so he's not getting moved. And Campbell takes both of those 1st's to dump, and Hawks aren't trading Murphy for Foegele and Cici.</div></div>
I know every fan overrates their players but come on now lmao. Hawks aren't trading Murphy for Foegele and Ceci is too much? Foegele is a capable top 6 guy who can play well anywhere in a lineup and Ceci is a fringe top 4 dman. How on earth is Murphy even close to that value, let alone that 4.4M of his being a bad contract lol
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com