Moose_on_the_Loose

Moose

Member Since

Sep. 8, 2020

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

0.0

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsNov. 24, 2023 at 6:06 p.m.

Thread: Favorite Trade Partners

Why do the Pens do this?

this is hilariously good for Vancouver...

Legit first liner, for a average middle 6 guy, a B+~ level prospect and a 3rd?

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsNov. 11, 2023 at 12:12 a.m.

Thread: Zad deal

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Moose_on_the_Loose</b></div><div>Great trade.</div></div>

I agree

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsJun. 24, 2023 at 5:53 p.m.

Thread: Byram moved due to cap issues with rfa

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Moose_on_the_Loose</b></div><div>Even the Moose declines.</div></div>

I think Canuck fans deline the moose, he caused enough problems for that franchise

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 29, 2022 at 6:13 p.m.

Thread: Trials and tribulations

It would take much more than that for the Wings to take on Myers. I like him tho. With some heavy retention I could see the groundworks of being a decent deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 29, 2022 at 6:02 p.m.

Thread: Trials and tribulations

Chicago's the wrong team for Tanner, but with retention we'd get a 3rd+ easy.
After the offseason Myers will have been paid his bonus and will only be owed $1mil in actual salary. If Canucks retain 50% we easily get a mid-rounder for him.
That Boeser trade is horrific, no way we do that.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 29, 2022 at 3:39 p.m.

Thread: Revamp

Pens accept

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMar. 10, 2022 at 9:50 a.m.

Thread: If the rangers go all in

We are not trading Miller unless teams over pay huge.why would we.not even close to overpaying.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMar. 9, 2022 at 8:47 p.m.

Thread: Aves miss out on Claude

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>Only retaining 50% of Garland for this season.

Great trade.</div></div>

I don’t think you can only retain for 1 season. I believe if VAN retains, it will be for the duration of the contract. So in that case, I’m not retaining and the wouldn’t happen unless we take money back.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 27, 2022 at 12:16 p.m.

Thread: If the Rangers want JT

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks1972</b></div><div>Come on people. I'm a Canucks fan. That's not going to happen.

They need to go after Braden Schneider if anyone on the Rangers. Schneider, Kravstov and a 2nd.
The only way I trade Miller is if it's for a D and a stud too 4 young D. If not we keep him.

The key is to try and trade Dickinson, Pearson, Myers etc</div></div>

I think the point here is, its gonna take a kings ransom for us to trade Miller. We dont have to trade him.Yes they are very one sided trades but its what it will take to move Miller.IMHO

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 27, 2022 at 5:56 p.m.

Thread: If the Rangers want JT

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div>I think the point here is, its gonna take a kings ransom for us to trade Miller. We dont have to trade him.Yes they are very one sided trades but its what it will take to move Miller.IMHO</div></div>

You can keep him and waste another 1 1/2 of the poor guys career.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsMar. 9, 2022 at 4:50 p.m.

Thread: Devils goalie fix

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Icedragon4405</b></div><div>2022 1st is top 3 protected</div></div>

Instead of top 3 protected, how about your next 7 firsts and no protection also we'll keep Demko and you can have Halak.

That's the same level of logic.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 26, 2022 at 9:50 p.m.

Thread: If the Leafs want JT

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PJ_Acorn</b></div><div>Leafs have no need for a Center. No matter how good the player is.</div></div>

It appears that we need goaltending...WTF??

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 26, 2022 at 9:22 p.m.

Thread: If the Rangers want JT

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>Another good trade. Agreed.</div></div>

Unless you have multiple personalities, of course you agree with your own trade.

Once again, probably the value of Miller, but if I'm the Rangers, I don't give up on a first overall who hasn't even been in the league 2 years for a 2 year rental. They've got the opportunity to be a power house for years with what they've built

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 26, 2022 at 8:38 p.m.

Thread: If the Leafs want JT

Good player, I am not disputing that of course. Hopefully this avoids people getting their panties in a knot, but i don't agree

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 26, 2022 at 8:30 p.m.

Thread: If the Leafs want JT

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>Good trade</div></div>

LOL, you can't post that on your own trade.

It's what it will take. But I don't like it for the Leafs. Too much future, and our issue is more on the back end and bottom 6 forwards. He'd look good on the wing with the OG JT and Willie Styles though.

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 16, 2022 at 7:04 p.m.

Thread: Heavy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>JT Miller is JT Miller, but a late first round pick could be anything!
It could be JT Miller!</div></div>

Kind of my point

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 17, 2022 at 2:40 a.m.

Thread: Undergrounded

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>Moose says this deal is done.</div></div>

As a Canucks fan I am legally required to say
Puck (with an F) Messier

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 22, 2021 at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Dear Jim Dont Muck This Up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>Following the rumor mill, if not Boston, there are other teams looking at Holtby that would give up a decent RD with this package.</div></div>

That "rumor" was anything but. It was started because some hack Boston writer mentioned Holtby as someone who could be available. They also listed 9-10 other players Boston could look at. Someone then spun that into Boston has interest in Holtby. No legit Bruins insider has talked about it, no one at the national level has talked about it. It's not a legitimate rumor.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 22, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.

Thread: Dear Jim Dont Muck This Up

Looks good. Wonder if we take a run at Schwartz to move Pearson down. Also interested to see if Schmidt gets moved, then things are going to get interesting.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 20, 2021 at 7:40 p.m.

Thread: Pick up the phone Jim

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kjw_gm</b></div><div>Any idea how the cap works if Loui heads back to Sweden after his bonus?

Lowry would be hard to pry away, Copp would be the next choice. I figure the Jets won't keep all those centremen.</div></div>

I think if Eriksson retires we'll have a 2mil recapture penalty and if we could pry Patrick from Philly he would be my choice for 3C tbh

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 20, 2021 at 7:09 p.m.

Thread: Pick up the phone Jim

The Jets have no need for another goalie. The current rotation is doing great and the also have Berdin in the Moose waiting in the wings if they need him as a backup next season. Berdin is ready for the NHL already skill level wise so that trade doesn’t make a whole lot of sense for them. Lowry is their best shut down centre and to trade for a goalie prospect doesn’t make a whole lot of sense when they already have arguably the best goalie in the league. Hellebuyck is only 28 so Jets are set for the future in goal.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 20, 2021 at 6:52 p.m.

Thread: Pick up the phone Jim

There's a report going around that he could be going back to Sweden after his bonus is paid. Also Winnipeg isn't trading Lowry right after signing him

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 8, 2020 at 9:39 p.m.

Thread: Time to Move Contracts

Canucks can hold onto Eriksson for one more year and buy him out on his last year. We'll get 2 million in savings. His buy out the following year will count for 1M but we also have Roussel, Beagle and Luongo's contracts off the books. The Canucks can make it work this year, don't be so eager to sell the picks or farm for dumping Eriksson :)

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 8, 2020 at 9:31 p.m.

Thread: Time to Move Contracts

So back-to-back years the Canucks have no picks in the first two rounds? No, you're not selling all those picks. How are they going to survive with Petey and Hughes on expensive contracts. We need ELCs to balance everything out.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 8, 2020 at 6:36 p.m.

Thread: Time to Move Contracts

Youre not getting enough for Stetcher from OTT

Combine the OTT trade and the LA trade and OTT will take that.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Moose_on_the_Loose

Moose

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day