SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

PantsOffnJacket

Fire J.D. too
Member Since
Jan. 7, 2021
Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forum Posts
1702
Posts per Day
1.4
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 11:13 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12 at 11:11 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 11 at 9:39 p.m.
Thread: A big Booner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jacketsman61</b></div><div>That Jenner trade is no where close to what it would cost a team. If Carolina wants Jenner it starts with a 1st and two top prospects. Reason is Jenner is on a very team friendly deal, his game translates to playoff hockey very well in that he is what most teams covet, scarcity of players like him on the market, he plays all situations, he has term on his contract which doesn’t make him a rental, and the Jackets if they did trade him would want a kings ransom for their captain.</div></div>

Hey I want the world for him too haha but if he got moved this season, a real trade does look something like this one with the exception of maybe instead of Drury it could be Jarvis or another 2nd(th could turn into a 1st if Stanley finals are reached).

But I know canes fans might burn the barn down if Jarvis got moved.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 10 at 10:46 p.m.
Thread: Jenner Tanev
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dk325</b></div><div>Trading Jenner makes sense at this point IMO. It just has to be for a return that works. Broberg wouldn't be a player the Jackets would be interested in with Werenski, Provorov, Bean, Mateychuk, Svozil, and like 6 or 7 more LD prospects in the system.</div></div>

💔


In all seriousness, I don't want to trade Jenner until he's in the last year of the contract. He's so valuable to the young guys coming up, I want him to be the model of what being a jacket means to these guys.
BUT I get its a business too, and if is moved it better bring back something worth it.

Broberg +1st is a good start and I really like Broberg, even if we have so many guys coming up. They all won't beable to play and I could see him pushing the others out for spot. He's killing it in the AHL
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8 at 7:50 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8 at 7:47 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 6 at 6:58 p.m.
Thread: Leafs make an attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>netminder71</b></div><div>First off "if" the Caps can shed Carlson's contract it prob would require retention and they would NOT want older players back. So three players for three players doesnt make a whole lot of sense for the Caps even if term lengths are different.

Dealing Carlson would be smart as I think he's on the decline....and DC could rebuild the right side of the D with Iorio, Bear, Alexeyev, TvR among others. And they could even move Jensen or TvR as well.

Carlson should yield a 1st rounder based on his historical production and PP ability. Maybe a good 2nd and a very high prospect if you cannot get a 1st based on contract term/cost.
Edmundson is worth a 4th or 5th rounder at best, he is a 7th depth guy on most teams.
Dowd would cost a 2nd rounder and a middle prospect. He is WAY too valuable for the return above.

Keep Kampf as he could slot into bottom 6 role like what Eller provided before he left. He's got 4 years of term but at a good salary. Caps prob say no to Brodie even at an expiring deal, there are too many defensemen to develop and that's some prime ice time. Niemala can get moved out of this deal too, he's got 0 NHL games and again there are 3-4 decent D that can develop on lower pairings and AHL.

If I were GMBM I would trade you Carlson, Edmundson, and Lapierre (not Dowd) for a 1st Rounder, 3rd Rounder, and Kampf, plus a conditional middle round pick based on # of games Lapierre gets at NHL level in 2024-2025. Or if he signs beyond RFA contract w/ TOR.</div></div>

Okay fair enough.

But I would think your counter offer is lesser value then?

I had Brodie here with the idea caps would flip him for a pick at deadline.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 6 at 6:43 p.m.