ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

SlashHammer

Member Since

Mar. 2, 2024

Favourite Team

Calgary Flames

Forum Posts

11

Posts per Day

0.2

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 4:24 p.m.

Thread: Depth players 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Or you miss out on the opportunity and are stuck with a 35 year old goalie who doesn't want to be there</div></div>

Who? Markstrom? He doesn't care where. He just wants to win.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 4:19 p.m.

Thread: Depth players 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Keep dreaming</div></div>

Ask high. Settle for what you REALLY want. That's how negotiations work. More like Vanacek, Holtz, somebody else and a 1st

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 4:17 p.m.

Thread: Finishing it off

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Francis said on Feb 8th that Markstrom had not been asked yet. About a week later, he went on a podcast and said Conroy asked him and Markstrom said yes. Last night, he did a radio spot and claimed pen was never put to paper.

Every other source has indicated that Markstrom waived his NTC to go to NJD. Emily Kaplan even reported that Markstrom had thought he may stay in New York area after their road trip there in early/mid February.</div></div>

Francis just went on Steinbergs show and said he's not 100% sure if he agreed or not, or agreed he'd be "open" to Jersey without a deal or if Markstrom, being cheesed at management, now wants out. He's just not sure.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 4:13 p.m.

Thread: Depth players 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Redmile04</b></div><div>Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?</div></div>

Holtz, Seamus, Vanacek, 1st. Markstrom is WAY better than what Jersey has now. He'd be a beast in the East.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 4:11 p.m.

Thread: Depth players 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Redmile04</b></div><div>Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?</div></div>

Holtz, Seamus, Vanacek 1st, 2mil retention.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 4:02 p.m.

Thread: Hanifin-Panthers

No Mackie Samoskevich, no deal

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 3:54 p.m.

Thread: Conroy has played Fitzgerald like a fiddle

Calgary accepts the NJD deal but rejects BOS. Rather have Lohrei than Grzelcyk anyway since CAL can't have Poitras.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 3:45 p.m.

Thread: Finishing it off

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Holtz for Markstrom and ~$2m was the trade they agreed upon. He was the piece that Conroy asked for. It was the piece that prompted him to go to Markstrom and ask him to waive.

If you have seen anything that is different, tell me, or send a link or a source..</div></div>

Whether Markstrom waived or not is open for debate. 1 report said yes, many others said no. Eric Francis says no, it didn't get that far. Besides, it would have to Holtz, +, + anyway

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 3:42 p.m.

Thread: Finishing it off

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>Curious what value DeBrusk would have to Calgary if he’s open to an extension? He is a solid two way player and it is hometown state. I would think that a concept of

DeBrusk, Forbort or Grz (retained 50%), Lohrei for Hanifin makes sense to me if DeBrusk is willing to extend.</div></div>

DeBrusk would have value if only for his father to choke on it if his kid plays there. Louie HATES the Flames

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 3:38 p.m.

Thread: Depth players 2

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?</div></div>

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2 at 3:36 p.m.

Thread: Depth players 2

Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.

SalarySwish | NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly

Popular Teams
Toronto Raptors | Los Angeles Lakers | New York Knicks | Chicago Bulls | Boston Celtics | Cleveland Cavaliers | Golden State Warriors | Miami Heat | Houston Rockets

Popular Players
LeBron James | Stephen Curry | Kawhi Leonard | Pascal Siakam | Kyrie Irving | Giannis Antetokounmpo | James Harden | Kevin Durant | Nikola Jokić | Luka Dončić

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2024 CapFriendly.com