SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Depth players 2

Created by: Redmile04
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 2, 2024
Published: Mar. 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. 2024 4th round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Howard, Isaac [Reserve List]
  2. Perbix, Nick
  3. Thompson, Jack
  4. 2026 1st round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Hanifin, Noah
Additional Details:
Retained 2 475 000
3.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
27$83,500,000$79,799,166$0$1,145,000$3,700,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,675,000$1,675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 2 at 3:30 p.m.
#1
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 1,431
Only if Julien Brisebois is suffering Brain Damage
Mar. 2 at 3:32 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
Only if Julien Brisebois is suffering Brain Damage


Who would you suggest? If brisebois insist that he wants Hanifin.
Mar. 2 at 3:32 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?
dgibb10 liked this.
Mar. 2 at 3:34 p.m.
#4
Wooooooo!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 7
Likes: 2
As a Canes fan, I reject this. However it’s not a bad trade just not for me.
Mar. 2 at 3:36 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 11
Likes: 2
Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.
Mar. 2 at 3:38 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?


Wasn't there article that said that NJ? Is willing to remove the retention? So I'm not sure what they would replace it with or remove
Mar. 2 at 3:38 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
Quoting: SlashHammer
Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.


There were no other pieces.
dgibb10 liked this.
Mar. 2 at 3:38 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 11
Likes: 2
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?


Quoting: NHLfan10506
The GMs previously agreed upon:
Holtz = Markstrom with ~$2m retained

Now we have got:
Holtz, Bahl, Vanecek, 1st
But no retention?

If it costs so much to dump Vanecek, we’d just keep him. Otherwise, it’s hard to see how the return has increased?
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Mar. 2 at 3:39 p.m.
#9
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 1,431
Quoting: Redmile04
Who would you suggest? If brisebois insist that he wants Hanifin.


1 TB doesn't need the retention
2 Howard and Gauthier should 100% be out of play.
Honestly if he does this it tells me Hedman is either Traded this off season or his final year is next.
Id probably max out at switching Howard with Duke an d Thompson with Finley
Redmile04 liked this.
Mar. 2 at 3:39 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: SlashHammer
Holtz and Markstrom we know about. You're assuming the other pieces. You can't know that.


Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?
Mar. 2 at 3:40 p.m.
#11
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 276
Likes: 77
I’d be fine with everything but adding depth. We’re re tooling not gearing up for a playoff run so kinda seems unnecessary.

Just wait till NJ fans see their lord and saviour Alexander Holtz is in the Marky deal. Automatic no from them.

Bahl doesn’t need to be in there imo. Neither does Vancek, just defeats the purpose of the trade by still taking up Wolfs NHL spot. Just retain 1-2 mill on Marky instead.
Mar. 2 at 3:40 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
1 TB doesn't need the retention
2 Howard and Gauthier should 100% be out of play.
Honestly if he does this it tells me Hedman is either Traded this off season or his final year is next.
Id probably max out at switching Howard with Duke an d Thompson with Finley


Thanks for your reply
Boltsradynasty liked this.
Mar. 2 at 3:41 p.m.
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 3,138
Quoting: Redmile04
Wasn't there article that said that NJ? Is willing to remove the retention? So I'm not sure what they would replace it with or remove


The article said NJD was willing to do a trade without retention, not that they were willing to give what they were willing to pay for retained markstrom for unretained markstrom.

Before: NJD unwilling to take on markstrom unless he came with retention
Now: NJD willing to take on markstrom even unretained.
Mar. 2 at 3:41 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
I’d be fine with everything but adding depth. We’re re tooling not gearing up for a playoff run so kinda seems unnecessary.

Just wait till NJ fans see their lord and saviour Alexander Holtz is in the Marky deal. Automatic no from them.

Bahl doesn’t need to be in there imo. Neither does Vancek, just defeats the purpose of the trade by still taking up Wolfs NHL spot. Just retain 1-2 mill on Marky instead.


I don't know if we can make this work
Mar. 2 at 3:41 p.m.
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 3,138
Quoting: Redmile04
Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?


If Seamus Casey was involved in the trade it would have leaked
Mar. 2 at 3:42 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
KippertheGoat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 481
Likes: 36
Quoting: dgibb10
The article said NJD was willing to do a trade without retention, not that they were willing to give what they were willing to pay for retained markstrom for unretained markstrom.

Before: NJD unwilling to take on markstrom unless he came with retention
Now: NJD willing to take on markstrom even unretained.


So can you refresh my mind in what offer Was again
Mar. 2 at 3:42 p.m.
#17
R.I.P Yotes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 276
Likes: 77
Quoting: Redmile04
I don't know if we can make this work


There’s a reason it hasn’t been done 😂

Perfect trade partners that both overvalue their pieces.
Mar. 2 at 3:43 p.m.
#18
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 1,431
Quoting: Redmile04
Thanks for your reply


I'm not as high on going after Hanifin as some here . Would he be a nice get ? Absolutely! Can t. Really afford him? Absolutely not.
You're welcome no problem.
Mar. 2 at 3:43 p.m.
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,903
Likes: 3,138
Quoting: Redmile04
So can you refresh my mind in what offer Was again


Nothing 100% confirmed.

Holtz for Markstrom with retention is the reported deal that almost went through.
Mar. 2 at 3:44 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
Quoting: Redmile04
Wasn't there article that said that NJ? Is willing to remove the retention? So I'm not sure what they would replace it with or remove


Pierre LeBrun put out a story yesterday that Devils GM had recently indicated to Calgary that he would do a trade without retention. (Unclear if this came before or after Markstrom’s comments yesterday).

While retention appeared to be the hang up early on, when this story first came out, a number of people have said since it was not the retention but the cost of the retention.

Later, it came out the the deal they agreed on included $2m of retention (as recently as Friedman saying last night on NHL network around 7pm Eastern).

I suspect the hang-up was more about Fitzy’s bid for Hanifin as well…until Hanifin moves, he wants combined package. (My speculation)
dgibb10 liked this.
Mar. 2 at 3:46 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
Quoting: MyTeamsSuck
I’d be fine with everything but adding depth. We’re re tooling not gearing up for a playoff run so kinda seems unnecessary.

Just wait till NJ fans see their lord and saviour Alexander Holtz is in the Marky deal. Automatic no from them.

Bahl doesn’t need to be in there imo. Neither does Vancek, just defeats the purpose of the trade by still taking up Wolfs NHL spot. Just retain 1-2 mill on Marky instead.


Devils fans do not want to see Holtz in this deal, but have accepted it since it’s been reported in a number of spots.
Mar. 2 at 3:47 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
Quoting: dgibb10
If Seamus Casey was involved in the trade it would have leaked


Seamus too famous for Flame-es
Mar. 2 at 3:51 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,193
Likes: 18,359
Quoting: SlashHammer


Welcome to CapFriendly, SlashHammer!

It appears you responded without a message.

If you want to respond, hit the ‘quote’ button under the text and type your message in the box at the bottom.
Mar. 2 at 3:55 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,827
Likes: 1,977
Uh no
Mar. 2 at 4:11 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 11
Likes: 2
Quoting: Redmile04
Well who would you add? Seamus, Graham?


Holtz, Seamus, Vanacek 1st, 2mil retention.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll