SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

StanTheMan

Member Since
Jan. 8, 2017
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
17
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 20, 2018 at 9:29 p.m.
Thread: Lindholm?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Vanderm</b></div><div>This deal would work for CGY, I think. Faulk is definitely a downgrade relative to Hamilton, but CGY might need to add a bit here on the Bennett for Lindholm piece.

That said, Treliving has worked some good deals in the past, and GMs do like to do a matching "roster player for roster player" structure to trades. This being a 2-for-2 fits that bill.

CGY could add to this deal to make it work, if need be with a prospect.</div></div>

If I’m Calgary theirs no way in hell I do this deal. Lindholm is averaging around 45 points a year, whereas Bennett is both younger and averaging around 30 points a year. Not much of an upgrade their, and certainly not worth downgrading from Hamilton (the highest scoring dman last year) to Faulk. Bad bad trade for Calgary.
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 8, 2017 at 10:30 p.m.
Thread: Flames1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div><i>I don't know if the Isles or Ducks are in trouble, cause every team is going go lose one player. Since the Leafs can logically protect 5 Dmen, I think they could move a better package to Isles and/or Ducks for their "4" Dman.
Your trade has them losing Strome and one of Hamonic or Poluck and only getting Andersen in return. Just think their might be better deals for the Isles.</i></div></div>

You might be right, I just targeted Strome because I know the NYI have expansion issues and I don't think they are very high on Strome right now as he has had a rough start to the season and been a healthy scratch a few times. Anderrson has also had a very good first pro season so far and would be valuable in a trade IMO. Maybe the Flames add a pick.