Warpbox Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 16 at 11:07 p.m.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 16 at 11:44 a.m.

I can't see Joshua walking to sign for that

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 15 at 10:14 a.m.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruceBanner</b></div><div>Dhillon makes sense but Zadorov is younger.</div></div>

My reasoning on Dillon was incase Zadorov asked for like 5 or wants term where hopefully you could get Dillon on an Ian Cole style 1 year deal

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 12 at 6:11 p.m.

Thread: My Dream Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockey91</b></div><div>Not offering enough to Reinhart. Fla can just resign him to a 8 year 8.5 mil contract that’s more than what you’re offering with taxes</div></div>

8.5 in Florida vs 9.5 in Vancouver is relatively comparable. It's an almost negligible difference and then you can factor in maybe he wants to play for his hometown. Yes some players care about every last dollar but other players (ie Tavares) are willing to give up some money to go home

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 3:53 p.m.

Thread: What do these players have in common

Even Strength Goals leaders?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 10:42 p.m.

Thread: Marchessault Toffoli

You think that that's all it takes to dump Gallagher? I have some bad bad news for you

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 8:16 p.m.

Thread: Expansion draft

0 chance on Hoglander being unprotected

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 3:01 p.m.

Thread: Next Year

Canucks don't even consider that. Hanifin isn't signing in Canada. and that's real low on Pesce. Highly doubt Guentzel signs in EDM either, especially for only 8x5

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 8 at 11:14 a.m.

Thread: TRADE DEADLINE

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheCoontniac</b></div><div>Youre right... I thought i had something here</div></div>

I really thought offering up current Canes in Hamilton AND Trocheck would be enough but not for Oilers fans apparently.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 11:38 p.m.

Thread: FLEECE

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>canucksfan43</b></div><div>or Lekkermaki</div></div>

They said Hogs, Lekkerimaki, and a first. This is hilarious

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 11:32 p.m.

Thread: FLEECE

They really thought they were getting Nikishin

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:42 p.m.

Thread: Whats on the table

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1234</b></div><div>Maybe I’m missing something…but it looks like it’s Lindholm and a prospect. So I don’t see who the young cheap guy that’s top 10 in 5v5 scoring</div></div>

I'm an idiot apparently, I thought this was a different one which was Hoglander + Lindholm.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 4:02 p.m.

Thread: trade deadline

I think these offers would actually make the entire NHL not trade with you

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 3:57 p.m.

Thread: DeBrusk and Johnasen

We aren't giving up Hoglander

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 3:56 p.m.

Thread: Whats on the table

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SidTheKid35</b></div><div>Guentzel is better than lindholm 💀 it won’t be a one for one deal. Canucks will add a prospect or a young NHLer and then Lindholm will be flipped for a pick and another prospect.

Reason this hasn’t happened yet because dubas is likely adamant on Lekerimaki being part of the deal. Jim Rutherford will fold eventually</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyfan1234</b></div><div>Sure but he isn’t near the value of Guentzel. Lindholm has only gone down in value since becoming a Canuck.</div></div>

Not saying he is but Canucks will add picks well before they add a super young and cheap guy who's top 10 in 5-5 scoring

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 3:52 p.m.

Thread: Hanzel and Guentzel

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jeremyttowne</b></div><div>Just because you don't want Hoglander in play, doesn't mean he isn't in play. You may still be getting used to GMJR, but as a Penguins fan, I can tell you from experience that he is willing to ignore popular opinion in order to get a guy he wants. It led him to two Stanley Cups. His methods are unorthodox, but he has vision like no other. If I were a Canucks fan, I wouldn't want to lose Hoglander either. But to claim a guy is not in play, no matter who reported it, is ridiculous. We'll know who's not in play after the trade occurs.</div></div>

For sure but every report coming from Canucks insiders is Hoglander has been a no-go for everything

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:27 a.m.

Thread: Whats on the table

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SidTheKid35</b></div><div>Canucks won’t get Jake without giving something of value.</div></div>

I think Elias Lindholm is something of value

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:21 a.m.

Thread: Whats on the table

I'll tell you who's not (Lekkerimaki)

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:21 a.m.

Thread: Hanzel and Guentzel

Hoglander is not in play

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:15 a.m.

Thread: Sell high or dont sell

Lekkerimaki is not an available prospect

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:14 a.m.

Thread: Wake Up Kyle

Wait, so we're moving Lindholm and not getting Guentzel? Why would we move him then? Also how in the world would Pittsburgh get Geekie and Poitras in this?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:10 a.m.

Thread: Flyers

Canucks ask if you meant to offer this and accept immediately

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 10:09 a.m.

Thread: Buch

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>1 - It's specifically Willander's position, type and quality. But also Raty would be of little interest.

That said, I'm not expecting anything. I'm not trying to trade him. I'm just relaying the only approach that would likely get Army's attention.

2 - Not really sure what the TDL specifically has to do with it. Prospects of that caliber get traded all the time. It;s not a unicorn scenario.</div></div>

1 - Very fair. I'm not really sure what the St Louis prospect pool is looking for so I was kinda guessing with my offer.

2 - My reasoning was that generally around this part of the season if players were to get moved, super valuable prospects don't really get included in the deals. Though I could see that being different for Buch as he has those 2 years of team control.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 1:14 a.m.

Thread: Buch

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>You have to know this offer is not even close to acceptable. You cannot just pile up nickels and dimes to reach a dollar.

Either start with Willander, or don't bother starting. Just FYI.</div></div>

Genuinely curious, are you expecting a player of Willanders capability in a Buch trade or is it just the fall of between him and Raty is too big? If the latter I totally get it but I cannot think of the last time a prospect of his calibre was traded in a deadline deal (I could just be forgetting though)

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 6 at 10:11 p.m.

Thread: My max Price

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>actually the word is the deal is already done, people are waiting to announce it.</div></div>

Wait, where did you see that? I haven't seen any reporter say that about Guentzel

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Warpbox

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day