Nov 19, 2018
Posts per Day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMTD</b></div><div>Great analysis. You make a very good point, but so many teams are in the win now mode that they will jump at signing UFA if a GM thinks it put the team into the playoffs.
Just for fun, click on Okposo, then compare his current contract. Look at top 3 comparable: Lucic, Milan, Turris, Kyle and Horton, Nathan. While some do very well, Tavares and JVR come to mind, there are too many who do not.
I hope Betterall does not sign a big name UFA and continues to follow the steady progress path of trading with teams who want to deal (I.e. Anaheim and Carolina, Montour and Skinner).
It is too bad that the Sabres could not pick up Haula. He has a low cap, decent past performance and only had to give up a 5th (conditional) and a "C" prospect. I just noticed, I said Haula instead of Stastny in my comment above. LOL. I am going to correct it now.
On the other hand, unless at least 3 of Thompson, Olofsson, Nylander, Pilut, Mittelstadt, Ruotsalainen or Cozens (not likely), can perform at top six or second pairing NHL caliper, we will be a lottery team again and miss the playoffs.</div></div>
In my opinion, Botteril was the architect of the Penguins back to back runs. Once he left to go to Buffalo, Rutherturd (I know the misspelling but that should be his real name), has completely disregarded the game plan and used his dinosaur mentality of old time hockey in trying to revamp the teams identity into something that will not play to their strengths and prevent them from getting over the edge and back to champions. I wish Rutherturd would have retired and promoted Botteril. All Rutherturd has done is hand out hefty contracts to mid-tier players, trade away any and all assets trying to find that missing piece.
There's only a handful of FAs I would go after if there was any cap space to do so. The next Pens GM is gonna have his hands full and it's sad to say but in my opinion, I don't see the Penguins winning another championship in the Crosby/Malkin era. Too much damage control needs to be done and it will require losing a piece or two of the core.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMTD</b></div><div>There have been some very strange deals with cap dumps. Marleau and Miller at opposite ends of the spectrum. Marleau and a first? Wow, I thought at most it would take is a second or a middling prospect. Marleau has talent and was brought in to provide leadership to the Leafs. On the other hand, Miller's salary and production are out of sync. Helping Tampa by giving up a first for Miller is one that should get everyone upset.
While I agree, it is unlikely that this will get the job done, it is nice to dream. LOL
The trade favors Buffalo, I would love to get Miller and Stastny. I think it would take more than a 2nd and Nylander.
Yup, I would love to get both Miller and Haula for that.
Not even close in my mind either.</div></div>
I agree and to think the 1st w Marleau has set the new standard to what it will cost to dump salary. If VAN were giving up a 1st, they should have went after a different player and since TB needed cap relief, VAN could have used that to their advantage. Imagine what PIT has to give up to remove themselves from Johnson, Gubransson, Hornqvist and Bjugstad. I don't see how teams can continue to be contenders on a yearly basis by paying mid tier players and bottom 6 players monies that should given to your top 2 starting lines. Since when should a 20 goal scorer be paid almost 7m per year? It's insane.
Contracts should be performance based and bonuses paid should not reflect negatively towards the cap. The cap structure should allow a premium payment for players who have expired their RFA status and players entering and in their athletic primes. Once a player hits 31yrs of age, a new structure should be set to recognize the start of regression in performance and decline in abilities. By the time a players' "premium contract" has expired, said player should be financially secure enough to be able to live, save, etc. on the "regression contract". I'm not saying to pay an older player RFA money, but no way should they be making upwards of 10% of a teams total cap hit. There could be a clause set in, that if a player, once they hit 31 and has 2 or 3 years of declining numbers in a season, injuries exempt, their contract would be reworked to fit within a certain parameter. An example, if a player makes a base salary of 8m per year, played all 82 games and only put up 40 points when they used to average 70+ points in their prime years, they would get a base salary of 4m with performance bonuses. Spezza, Seabrook, Lucic, Ryan, Kesler, Erickson and even Toews to an extent, are all decent examples of bad contracts and payments on past performances. Paying certain players, especially role players based on past performance is bad business. Paying the "Stanley Cup Tax" on UFAs from most recent championships is also not wise. The CBA and NHL need to find a middle ground on how to handle the cap situation. Soon, players who deserve to be in the NHL won't be able to because they will price themselves out of the league and teams will consist of 2 solid lines of quality players and the bottom pairings will be nothing but sub-par players, RFAs and undrafted players.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>FL was clearing cap space for the summer, the penguins took advantage. It was a good deal for them.
He can bring back a bigger return. He put up 9 goals for the penguins in 32 games. That's a 20 goal average. Don't tell me, teams wouldn't give up more for him.</div></div>
Well obviously they didn't. The facts are right in front of you but you choose to ignore them, as usual. If he could have netted a better return, FLA would have pursued that option. It's evident there were no other takers or offers. Even if, as you assume, FLA was clearing space, a better return could have been a quality prospect, an impact draft pick or a low cost roster player with term and upside. Instead FLA got Brassard and Sheahan with blah draft picks for Bjugstad and McCann with McCann being the prize. Bjugstad also had a whopping 5 assists and since you like to reference averages, that would be a little over 10 assists, in 82 games. He has been on a downward spiral since putting up 24 goals (his only 20 goal season) 4 seasons ago. Hopefully you don't think his point total is good value in comparison to what his cap hit is. They didn't want to pay Bonino 4m, who is a better offensive player but Bjugstad is acceptable? Gimme a break.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AFOX10900</b></div><div>A. The lines aren't going to be that, they would change, and B. We brought in Kahun to play next to Malkin, I'm not complaining about having a 40 point ROOKIE who was in his first season on NA ice in the top 6, ZAR was hurt guy parts of last year and was also the only positive player when playing with Malkin and Kessel (ik +/- is a **** stat, but it does tell you something when one member of a line is +8 or 9 iirc, and the other two are both - I think) and Accari was one of the best 4th liners in the league last year, I have 0 complaints about having him on the fourth line, plus if you need to you can put rust on the LW, Aberg was on pace for 20-25 goals before he was traded to MIN, and Simon can play LW, and while he's not gonna put the pick in the net, he is a possession god</div></div>
Explain why Jack Johnson is still on the team. Him being on the roster can not be ideal now can it?