SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

YeGoat_SharanGoalvich

I love Sharangovich
Member Since
Jun. 28, 2019
Favourite Team
New Jersey Devils
Forum Posts
98
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 2, 2021 at 11:12 p.m.
Thread: Keep the 4th pick and dont be too aggressive
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PavelZachaGOAT37</b></div><div>Only defender I would trade 4th pick for is Sergachev. Other than him I think we just keep it. Sergy got lot of experience and is young so I would understand trading that pick for him, he would be the only player I can think of rn id be not mad at trading that pick for. But I agree with you, would rather keep pick and not go crazy in FA.

My ideal offseason
- Sign a vet forward, or trade for one in a cap dump where we get picks or prospects (closer to nhl ready)
- Sign a good tandem goalie and try to work a 1A 1B goalie system short term until Mac has a better team infront of him and he himself is better. (idk who but id be okay spending decent money on a 1-2 year deal)
- Vet defender who is solid on another short term deal (sign or trade for one) (Guys I like. Ian Cole, Savard, McCabe, Oleksiak, just to name a few).

Sticking to the youth and saving money for Jack Bratt Ty Smith Holtz Mac and other young guys is what I want. I hope we play it smart and don't rush it too too quickly by spending a ton of money.</div></div>

I would add Chychurn to the list and for the ideal Offseason, getting some cap dumps would be smart

10000% agree with everything else you said
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 4, 2021 at 1:02 p.m.
Thread: If the devils draft Luke Hughes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PavelZachaGOAT37</b></div><div>Yea was gonna say both Luke and Ty can play right side. I mean we will have a lack of right handed players but I guess having good players is more important than their handedness. Also Smith is a young rookie, I think his defense will get better with more time, he is a great skater and a smart player, he might never be shutdown, but he can be good enough. Same with Luke, he is young but also big too and going to continue to grow and put on size at Michigan. The future on the defense is very very bright!</div></div>

I think Luke and Ty will both be decent defensive because of their speed, hands, And hockey IQ (similar to Jack). The future is definetly looking bright on defense :)
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 4, 2021 at 12:08 p.m.
Thread: If the devils draft Luke Hughes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PavelZachaGOAT37</b></div><div>Yea was gonna say both Luke and Ty can play right side. I mean we will have a lack of right handed players but I guess having good players is more important than their handedness. Also Smith is a young rookie, I think his defense will get better with more time, he is a great skater and a smart player, he might never be shutdown, but he can be good enough. Same with Luke, he is young but also big too and going to continue to grow and put on size at Michigan. The future on the defense is very very bright!</div></div>

Exactly! You don’t have the be right handed to be good on that side. Look at TJ Brodie, and Mackenzie Weeger. They play opposite sides, and they are good at it. It wouldn’t hurt to try if they are comfortable with it. I don’t care what anyone says, if Luke Hughes is available, they are picking him.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 2, 2021 at 11:36 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 2, 2021 at 11:26 a.m.
Thread: Nylander
The Leafs are not going to trade Nylander. They like good players. IMO the Leafs are losers in a Severson for Nylander deal. It has whiffs of Larsson-Hall. I don't even think a defenceman would be their target, as their top 4 performed quite well this season and they have some good options at the bottom as well. Depth scoring was a bigger issue for Toronto, trading scoring for D doesn't help them win that playoff series.

I don't see the Leafs trading any of their top 4. They don't "have to" and unless an offer absolutely totally makes sense that improves the roster and is a slam dunk it won't happen. I don't see a 1-for-1 happening with the salary involved, and the Leafs are sure not to get value in a trade with multiple pieces. Smart GM's don't trade point per game players, no matter what.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 2, 2021 at 10:20 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 1, 2021 at 5:30 p.m.
Thread: No Marner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PavelZachaGOAT37</b></div><div>Yea fair point, he would def make us better no doubt. But I don't think we are ready yet realistically, Jack and Nico need to take the next steps before we are ready. Also tons of cap space, but tons of guys who gotta get paid eventually and that money will go fast with guys like Ty, Jack, Bratt, Zacha, Sharangovich, Kuokkanen, McLeod, Blackwood all expiring within 2 seasons or already expired. Granted they won't all be big extensions but my argument is the money will go fast. And also maintaining solid depth and breathing room for moves to be made.

I understand your reasoning. My counterargument is that we shouldn't be overvaluing our young players to the point where we are not going great players. Some of those players you mentioned are going to fail and will not be on the roster in a few years, and none of them have produced seasons comparable even to Marner's (18yr old) rookie season. Teams that win have difference makers/stars, Marner is and that's what this team needs. Plus with the cap going up in a few years, I don't think having Marner on the books at $11m is going to ruin this team's cap, even if all these players pan out.

Again, understand your reason, just respectfully disagree.</div></div>
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 11, 2021 at 9:33 a.m.