Yotes269 Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 9:51 p.m.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GeneralLandro</b></div><div>I’d say money is off on Necas Jarvis Guentzel & Zadorov myself

What would you trade him for? A 2nd?</div></div>

McBain is one of those guys that’s hard to quantify. What he brings to the bottom 6 is championship quality. Size, hits, grinds. If you look at his numbers? Yeah probably a 2nd, but on ice play? I’d need an overpay

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 8:30 p.m.

Thread: Storm surge

I’d rather have McBain and the 3rd

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 8 at 7:37 p.m.

Thread: Complete list of what Id offer for various goalies

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CooleyforCalder</b></div><div>Yotes would take a 1st for ingy</div></div>

I doubt it. We have absolutely nothing in the system besides Hrabal, and he’s no where near ready. Get rid of Ingram and what’s the plan to improve?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 6 at 10:50 p.m.

Thread: If we somehow find ourselves in the postseason next year looks different

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Vladar isn’t any good though. Why would you view him as anything but expendable? In fact every player on your side of that trade is expendable. Guys like Hunt and Rooney are waiver guys. If Markstrom decides he no longer is ticked at your ownership and wants to stay then obviously you wouldn’t trade for a goalie. If Markstrom status you’d still want to move out Vladar to clear a spot for Wolf.</div></div>
How does Rakell help any of that? Sure, he could absolutely strengthen the bottom 6, but at $5m?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 6 at 6:07 p.m.

Thread: If we somehow find ourselves in the postseason next year looks different

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>You can sign a better RW for the same cap hit… or you can take him and convert a 6th rounder into a 3rd. I think that’s a very easy decision.</div></div>

Josh Doan is a better option, and $25m isn’t some easy float that you think it is.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 10:40 p.m.

Thread: If we somehow find ourselves in the postseason next year looks different

There’s zero chance Arizona is paying Rakell $5m a season to play on the third line.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 5:16 p.m.

Thread: Andlauer Now or Never

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hckeydude123</b></div><div>Just a suggestion, buyout Korpi and buy Ingram from AZ for just a 2nd+Joseph.

Keeps the 1st and sheds more cap space.</div></div>

Arizona isn’t moving Ingram, and certainly aren’t moving him for Joseph and a 2nd

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 4:36 p.m.

Thread: Leafs next year - Cool-LE Trade with Arizona - NO NOT MATTHEWS

Yeah that doesn’t even go through in chel, enough said.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 6:19 p.m.

Thread: Tank for Tij

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I think Dickinson goes 4-5 . He’s really good and could probably jump to the nhl within 1 year like Provorov did</div></div>

I think we’d play him in the nhl next year. I love basically everything about his game and I don’t really see London improving him beyond where he’s at now.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 6:18 p.m.

Thread: Tank for Tij

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>If so I sure hope they don't take Catton over Tij.</div></div>

Honestly I do think Montreal takes Tij, they seem to love late risers with size and skating, it’s worked well so far and I wouldn’t be shocked if they do it again

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 5:33 p.m.

Thread: Tank for Tij

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>He Probably doesn't but we'll see. Depends on if Catton or Dickinson is still available I think.</div></div>

Catton will probably be there, I think Arizona takes Dickinson at 5

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 3 at 6:56 p.m.

Thread: youth

Arizona isn’t trading Keller. Easy no.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 3 at 2:08 p.m.

Thread: inject some experience and make them actualy watchable

Plenty watchable as it is. Guenther on the 4th line is just a laughably terrible idea

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 3 at 12:52 a.m.

Thread: Pens great offseason

Why in the world would Arizona even consider that?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 9:03 p.m.

Thread: Tweaks

No one is touching that Korpisalo contract, let alone for a single 2nd

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 4:22 p.m.

Thread: Next Season

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canesfan21_</b></div><div>*Utah</div></div>

Good one. Still going to be Arizona, still declining the trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 1 at 2:07 p.m.

Thread: Next Season

Yeah this has no chance, Arizona doesn’t even consider it

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 31 at 1:21 p.m.

Thread: Who needs draft picks

Arizona has no desire to get rid of crouse, people simply want him so they make ACGMs for him. We’re not moving him

Forum: Fauteuil - DGMar. 31 at 1:19 p.m.

Thread: Big Forward

Arizona passes. One year of Matheson isn’t worth Crouse.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 30 at 7:04 a.m.

Thread: What would Vancouver have to add

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CM_Insane</b></div><div>The kids I understand but even Crouse? That wouldn't be rushing the rebuild just trading from a position of strength to a weakness.</div></div>

We don’t have any other power forwards, and he’s basically the de facto captain, moving him would be a crushing blow to the room. Everyone here currently wants to be here, keeping that culture is important

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 29 at 7:20 p.m.

Thread: What would Vancouver have to add

There’s just not much reason for Arizona to do this, for any of the forwards. We haven’t been rushing the rebuild, if we want Hronek (who’s awesome, so no shade to him) why not just draft Parekh or Buium? They project the same, if not better.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 28 at 5:31 p.m.

Thread: Add to D-Core and get another 2024 1st

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Marked_Difference</b></div><div>I think the real struggle in PIT is usage not player. Graves has been brutal in PIT but he is still a good 2nd pair D, worth a 2nd without retention. With retention there is need to add maybe a 4th but a 3rd should seal a deal.</div></div>

I like Graves the player, I just think they’ve murdered his value this year. The contract is hefty and as you said, it’s a brutal fit

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 28 at 3:01 p.m.

Thread: Avs next season

Bjugy is a .5 PPG player on a cheap deal, two way 20 goal centers cost more than a 26 2nd and 4th especially with retention

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 28 at 2:55 p.m.

Thread: Add to D-Core and get another 2024 1st

Keller-Hayton-Schmaltz has proven they can produce against the other teams toughest matchups, let Crouse-Cooley-Guenther take on easier matchups to produce. You could probably drop the 2nd from Graves, he’s had a pretty brutal year there. If that Washington pick is somewhere like 14 or 15 I’m doing it, if not I’m finding someone else who’d be in that range who’s interested in that package.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 27 at 6:22 p.m.

Thread: Players to target for next year

Hayton is playing 1C when he’s healthy, which he hasn’t been at all this year. He doesn’t need a change of scenery, he needs to get off injured reserve.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Yotes269

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day