SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

ashaw9377

Member Since
Jan. 11, 2017
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
139
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 21, 2019 at 9:15 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2019 at 9:38 a.m.
Thread: rangers cap dump for cap dump
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BSpadaro83</b></div><div>The ground work sure. But the numbers you chose make less sense. Giradi's cap hit falls to 1.1m next year. Retaining almost half of Smith AND taking Marleau this year doesnt save them enough in the long run to not be able to go for Panarin. So this deal would have to happen post July 1, when the Rangers miss on Panarin, and cant buy out Marleau at that point, so he doesnt even waive to come to NY because he wants to be out west.</div></div>

I think this deal and Parnarin are not related at all. You could still make this deal, sign your RFA's and sign Parnarin if you wanted to. Maybe the amount retained for Smith changes and/or draft compensation changes but this trade doesn't have to happen after the buyout period is over.

What would you retain on Smith and/or what compensation would you want to make this trade work?
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2019 at 8:58 a.m.
Thread: rangers cap dump for cap dump
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BSpadaro83</b></div><div>Smiths buyout cap hit is 970k this year and 3.1m next, then 1.1 next two. Why would they take on 6.5 min to keep a 2.1m cap hit this year and only save 1m next year? 3rd round pick isnt worth that, just buy him out and leave you guys to figure out Marleau elsewhere.</div></div>

Because even with the moves they made so far I don't think they are a legit contender. If they could avoid paying smith for 4 years I think that is valuable. Marleau would come off the books after this year. Plus Girardi has a 3.1M cap hit this year from his buyout. Smith, Staal, Shattenkirk all come off the following year. Why keep paying these guys after that if they don't have to. Rangers aren't exactly strapped for cash either. They can afford to make a move like this. Maybe you get more draft compensation than. But I think the ground work of this deal could really benefit the Rangers in the long run.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2019 at 4:23 p.m.
Thread: Labanc
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>shmoeman</b></div><div>Fit and trade makes sense, but not even close to enough in return</div></div>

What do you think would be fair. My thinking was that they are in a win now mode and would rather have players that could contribute at the NHL level instead of picks and prospects. Pionk would be good in SJ playing 3rd pair minutes for less than you pay Braun. Vesey would be a top 9 forward for them that adds depth up front. Nieves would be a 13th forward capable of playing on the 4th line. This is clearly quantity over quality here but being strapped against the cap I figured filling out 3 roster spots plus shedding Braun's salary would be enough. Would you be more interested in a prospect like Anderson or Lindgren? Those types of players just don't fit the timeline to me when your paying Karlesson 11.5M a year.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 10, 2019 at 6:45 p.m.
Thread: Trying Something Somewhat New EDM TBL WIN CAR FLA
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>LOL

IDK how many times we have to do this. Kreider is the Pacioretty or Turris trade with a little extra because he's better.

How would you rate these assets: Yamamoto, Nick Suzuki, Sam Girard?

How would you rate these assets: Tatar, Kamenev, Puljujarvi

Would you say Yamamoto is a step below the other 2 ? I would

So maybe instead of a 2nd round pick, the little more becomes a 1st round pick. And that 1st round pick moves up in the draft to 8 because Yamamoto is a decent step down from Girard/Suzuki.

That's the rational response, instead of "nahhh Kreider ain't that good"

Strome =2nd
Lindgren =2nd
Yamamoto = 1st
1st

So 2 1sts and 2 2nds for a guy that will cost 7mil + and doesn't give you much more value than Tony Deangelo?

lol

Capfriendly really undervalues cap space.

The Callahan deal sounds a lot like the Bickel deal. They had similar cap impact.

That trade returned a 2nd and 3rd. Very similar to Keane + 3rd.

You know what Chicago added to make up for that cap dump Bickel? Teravainen....yeah you're gonna to add more.

What's the comparable to Teravainen?</div></div>

Pacioretty averages .7 points per game over his career. Kreider .6. That means one is a 70 point player and the other a 50 point player. Stop comparing the two. pach is better. And I'm a ranger fan.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 9, 2019 at 12:35 a.m.
Thread: DucksLightning cap dump BosChiCol trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>lol that's cute. You seem to know your prospects pretty well.


I like Senyshyn's production. His 24 points as a 21 year old as an AHL player are impressive. But if I wanted a ....better prospect I could just look internally. Perhaps at Tim Gettinger who 3 more points in 2 less games than Senyshyn, which would be cool But he's also an entire year younger and plays on a team that scored 20 less goals on the year.

Idk maybe I can't get a prospect as good as Gettinger for Kreider. I could hope for one as good as Ryan Gropp...who put up 2 more points in 5 less games than Senyshyn... I doubt any team would give up a prospect as good as Gropp though.

IDK what do you think?</div></div>

My bad. You are just so much smarter than me guy. i guess I should ask for tolvanen and 2 firsts for Kreider. That sounds about right. You also forgot that Senyshen had 1 more points than Gettinget in 2 less NHL games. Since stats are the only thing that matter to you I guess hes the better prospect.

Dont forget Kreider had 23 points in his first season in the AHL. I guess he is worth Gropp.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 6, 2019 at 1:12 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 6, 2019 at 12:02 p.m.