SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

boston781

boston781
Member Since
Jan. 31, 2016
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
36
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 2, 2018 at 12:18 p.m.
Thread: Season Opener?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>If anything Backes goes to the 4th line. Heinen had nearly 50 points as a rookie, so playing him with Kuraly and Nordstrom isn't going to help his development.

I'm a huge Bjork guy, but I could see him getting some time in the AHL (considering he's coming off injury) if he doesn't blow them away in camp.

Studnicka and Frederic are both major sleepers to earn a spot and I think they'll compete against JFK for #3C to start the year. I wouldn't be surprised to see Studnicka get the nod for a 7-9 games before Boston decides whether or not to keep him or send him back to juniors. This also gives JFK some ample minutes in the AHL to make sure he's good to go after his concussion last year.

I think Acciari could be an odd man out here. He role is really just a 4th line checker (something Backes &amp; Wagner bring). He's only got a year left on his deal, so maybe you could get a later pick or package him in a deal.

Lastly, I could see Moore paired with Carlo and Krug on the 3rd pairing. Give Krug lesser competition to face and double him up on both PP's</div></div>

Understand where you're coming from on all of this. On the Studnicka/Frederic/JFK thing. I'm personally convinced they're giving Frederic a whole season in the AHL to let him develop even more than he already has. I do like the idea of Studnicka getting the 7-9 game stint before they make their decision on what to do, especially with JFK coming off the concussion. Who knows really. I guess it's good for a team to have plenty of options, especially if they run into the injury bug they had last season.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 2, 2018 at 12:14 p.m.
Thread: Season Opener?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Propeller09</b></div><div>Agree with Most of it.

I think it's Miller or Krug that they move though. They both have move value in return, and Mcquaid comes off next year any way and is a solid 6/7th dman and he will likely resign and be cheaper next year. Miller has the extra year and is a bit redundant. McAvoy and Carlo should carry the load on the right side. Moore has played RD too, so he can fill in there if need be. Golobeuf can fill in in case of short term injury on the right as well.

I think Backes slots down, but who knows. I also think Wagner makes in the lineup due to physicality. If they do go with JFK or Studnicka, they may want a vet out there with them.</div></div>

I can still see them moving Krug or Miller, but I feel that McQuaid will ultimately be the guy. To me, if a team loses a guy long term or for the season in camp or pre-season, they'll likely take McQuaid because he only has one year left and he is a low risk/reward guy. In the case of Krug, I feel we see some news on him once the Karlsson domino falls.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 2, 2018 at 12:11 p.m.
Thread: Season Opener?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>You started out with some good concepts here, but I have a couple big issues.

I like the idea of breaking up the top line for some depth. I like the idea of a kid grabbing the third line center role, but I think it Studnicka is the most likely candidate. I thought Bjork looked okay at best with Bergeron and Marchand. He's fast, but I dont think he can think the game at close to their speed. I actually think Heinen is the guy that would fit best there. You really lost me on the "heinen and backes are interchangeable," concept though. Heinen was fourth among bruins forwards in points last year. It was the first line, and then heinen.....aandddd now he's on the fourth line behind two rookies and a guy that looked like he was closer to retirement than top 9 minutes in the playoffs. Heinen is at worst third line and I think the way the off season is shaping up he'll likely be riding with either Krejci or Bergeron. The other problem is Grizz. They didn't give that dude two years to have him be the 7th d. He was fantastic all year for them. He got called up and refused to give the job up. They brought in Holden thinking he wasn't ready for playoff hockey, and his play forced him into the lineup. I think he's better than Krug.</div></div>

Understand the whole Heinen/Backes situation. Don't think they're totally interchangeable because I take Heinen over Backes any day. However, I feel that if Heinen doesn't grab a top-6 spot out of camp, he falls to 4th line because even though Bruce will play the kids, he's still got a little Claude in him and I can't see him starting the season with his third line being made up of 1st or 2nd year players.

As far as Grizz, I felt that when they signed him he was a lock for a top-6 spot. But then they went out and signed Moore to a 5-year deal on the same side and still haven't traded away anybody. To me, I can't see Cassidy benching the Captain, Krug, or a newly signed D-man to play Grzelcyk. Thing can change, obviously, but right now I'm kind of stumped with the defense situation.