guzman

Habs Fan

Member Since

Jun. 8, 2016

Favourite Team

Montreal Canadiens

2nd Favourite Team

Anaheim Ducks

Forum Posts

176

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Fauteuil - DGJul. 30, 2021 at 1:54 p.m.

Thread: 2 trades

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>What would the habs need to add in order to make it less laughable? i haven't seen many flames games but they struggled a lot last year. What would be your asking price?</div></div>

Lindholm was our most consistent player. Would take quite a bit to obtain him

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2019 at 11:18 p.m.

Thread: Custom

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>Why</div></div>

Are you serious ???
I think just the 2nd for Miller + Clarkson contract would make it (still I'll pass lol) Does all habs fan have forgot about Julsenn or what ? When healty he can play on the 3rd pair and has the potential to becoming petry replacement (not offensevely but a solid top #4)

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2019 at 11:45 p.m.

Thread: Custom

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>For one trade that didn’t pan out for us how many trades have we seen where. Prospect was traded for a player and the so called prospect didn’t even play a game or more than. 1year? I mean IMO it’s a small sacrifice and I’m not sold of him but I respect your opinion so let’s just agree to disagree on that one?

Other than that what’s your take on the other trades what would you do this summer?</div></div>

Times to go to bed for me maybe tomorrow (with a great sleep) we could continue the talk. Agree to disagree totally ok. Also English isn't my first language so devellopping my ideas properly is a challenge ;)

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2019 at 11:39 p.m.

Thread: Custom

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>Trading away one prospect not all of them jesus way to exaggerate buddy and then what if our window isn’t now let’s wait another 4-5 years when price is 37 and Weber has a cane and can’t skate then what all of a sudden all your prospect are superstars in your fairytale world cause not all prospects pan out.... if juulsen is part of the core that’s weak at least put brook who won D of the year in the whl instead of juulsen</div></div>
Yes keep Julsenn and trade Brook (Im not sold to his potential) ! Just saying kk Poehling suzuki may be ready in 2020-2021 witch is not in 6 years ! Good night ;)

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2019 at 11:34 p.m.

Thread: Custom

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>I agree with you 100% that D takes more time to develop but do you get my point? I think he could be a great shut down D but I doubt he could bring any offense.... I’ve seen him play at the world juniors in Montreal back in 2017 and he was dominant but he was nowhere near as good when he played in ahl and struggled a lot in the NHL</div></div>

Yes agree he wont become a Chabot but if he becomes a RHD Vlasic we would regret trading him. Like we still regret a previous trade for Gomez !
Edit : I dont meen to be irrespecful in my previous post sorry if I did

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2019 at 11:26 p.m.

Thread: Custom

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>I disagree I don’t think juulsen is that great he’s makes so many mistakes and brings nothing offensively... Miller can be dangerous and has an amazing clapper.... who cares about one year of clarkson on the LTIR for 2 years the habs didn’t use all their cap space pretty sure Mr.Molson can cough up the extra money for a year</div></div>

Julsenn is 22 and has played 40 games in the NHL
How can you be sure that he "doesn't bring anything offensevely and makes mistakes" !! The guy was 21(in october) !!!!
D Takes more time to devellop. Do you know how old was Chabot this season ? 22, like Julsenn if he would have played

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2019 at 11:21 p.m.

Thread: Custom

Winnipeg declines. This doesn't make any sense. Jets might be listening to offers but they are not going to trade a young Ehlers AND young Roslovic for older players in Shaw and Petry. On top getting Petry and Shaw by trading Ehlers will <strong>worsen</strong> their "cap hell situation". Both Habs player make 9.4 M while Ehlers makes 6M

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 10, 2019 at 3:55 p.m.

Thread: WPG trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>hes been playing big minutes with vegas and you might be right hes not top 2 material but ii think putting mete on the second pair is better even though miller is a RHD i think he would be a great addition... what do you think about the WIN trade?</div></div>

that's actually untrue

he was 5th among VGK in time on ice among D only 10 seconds from being 6th

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 10, 2019 at 3:33 p.m.

Thread: WPG trade

overpaid for RHD Collin Miller (whoes not a top pair D) IMO

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 6, 2019 at 9:52 p.m.

Thread: next year

Value is fair but targets are wrong. Lehk for Burakovsky is reasonable but you're taking a chance with locker room chemistry as Lehk is well liked and battles hard. Also you'd hope that if the Habs were moving out 2 assets like Suzuki and a 2nd it'd be for a lefty to play with Petry.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12, 2019 at 11:45 a.m.

Thread: More depth

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsForEver</b></div><div>The first trade I could see happening (even though I would personally say no)

The second trade isn't even considered by Montreal. Lehkonen for Hutton straight up wouldn't even be considered. Just scrap the idea completely.</div></div>

Why not? The way I see it, when Byron returns Lehkonen's spot is a puzzle. Yes he's got a good year so far but since we've got 6 3rd line forwards (lol) we can spare one for a good young LHD, don't you think? And please don't say Byron's going to be on the 4th line cause that's simply not happening, he's too good and too important to the habs.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 12, 2019 at 11:24 a.m.

Thread: More depth

Vancouver wouldn't have any interest in trading Hutton at the moment. While Edler has been hurt he has been playing 25-30 minutes a game and not looking out of place. And even when Edler is back their D-depth on the left side looks questionable. Trading him would leave them with 1 NHL caliber LHD, who is currently on IR.

Even if he has alternated good and bad years so far, Vancouver can't replace him. So that trade structure makes no sense for them.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5, 2019 at 9:10 a.m.

Thread: Schenn

Bruins would have to decide if ridding themselves of Backes contract is worth trading those futures. Might be a fair deal. But the reality is even Schenn or anyone isn't getting the Bruins (or Leafs) out of the Atlantic division this year.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4, 2019 at 11:12 p.m.

Thread: Schenn

I’ve said this many times on here, but I’ll say it again. I have no problem with retaining salary and taking on cap-dumps, but Backes is a total dealbreaker. The Blues need to move forward with new voices and develop new leadership in their lockeroom. Every time a team tries to go back to something that worked in the past, it fails and blows up in their face. Bringing back Backes would be a super lame move and would hold the organization back.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4, 2019 at 11:05 p.m.

Thread: Schenn

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>Well considering what they paid they obviously are going to try and get more or as much as what they paid for him... i do agree its an overpaiement but your also getting rid of that god awful contract that backes has...</div></div>

His no-trade gets limited after this season, but I guess there's not even that many tanking teams just willing to take on 6m at that point. That's a tough nut to crack, but I'd rather pay more for Tarasenko or Schwartz if I have that option

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4, 2019 at 10:51 p.m.

Thread: Cup push

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Username_Bot</b></div><div>because they aren't going to make the playoffs and would rather build for the future...</div></div>

so pens just won their 8th in a row. funny how you said they are going to miss the playoffs

Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 25, 2018 at 8:39 a.m.

Thread: Cup push

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Username_Bot</b></div><div>yeah yeah yeah... whatever... Don't forget that you guys are aging</div></div>

And their core is still putting up fantastic numbers lmao. Ill make sure to keep you posted in a few weeks about the standings. Ill guarantee you that they'll get hot and be near the top, like always. Dont get how the sabres have 1 hot streak in how many years and their fans think they are a cup contender? lmao lmao

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 4, 2019 at 10:59 p.m.

Thread: Schenn

What Stl payed for Schenn should have nothing to do with what the Bruins are paying for Schenn. That's just basic sunk cost.

With that said I don't think is far off from an actual trade. I don't want to pay this for Schenn, I don't think he's the player to go after, and I think he's gotten a great reputation simply by playing with better players. This is an overprice if you're asking me, so the B's will probably end up paying more :)

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 7:30 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hurricanes73</b></div><div>The canes have 4.5 untouchable players on their team. Aho, slavin, svechnikov, teravienen, and Hamilton if he doesn’t request a trade. The only way that they are giving up slavin is for a massive overpayment. He is what klingberg is to the stars for the canes. Teravienen i could see traded but he has such good chemistry with aho it would make no sense to trade him. I wonder is tarasenko or svechnikov could play lw because then the have Russian chemistry but it wouldn’t be worth it for losing the chem it aho</div></div>

as far as Klingberg he's a complete D and scored 50+ multiple times before age 25 so he's legit top 50 in the NHL i'd even say top 10 or damn near close .

Slavin is to CAR what Josh Gorges was to MTL . a Mentor to Subban , a Friend to Price , a NHL leader in shot blocks while playing reliable minutes and providing some offense here and there when given the chance to make a play without sacrificing defensive positioning .Slavin's great just like Gorges was for us but in the end josh got us a 2nd round pick i believe

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 6:56 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

I think it's a lot of changes for a team that's starting to work well together, and you're bringing in mostly offensive pieces. I like Zaitsev and Edmundson as gritty, defensive additions.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 6:48 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>Well that can’t be right ?</div></div>

The canes have 4.5 untouchable players on their team. Aho, slavin, svechnikov, teravienen, and Hamilton if he doesn’t request a trade. The only way that they are giving up slavin is for a massive overpayment. He is what klingberg is to the stars for the canes. Teravienen i could see traded but he has such good chemistry with aho it would make no sense to trade him. I wonder is tarasenko or svechnikov could play lw because then the have Russian chemistry but it wouldn’t be worth it for losing the chem it aho

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 6:44 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>What about the other trades?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>What about the other trades?</div></div>

The petry deal is pretty good and leafs could say yes but maybe a pick or low tier prospect to even it out.
The Habs are giving up their 2 best prospects and 2 good young players for tarasenko which is a lot but if the jabs are in a playoff position, then he could very helpful in the run on a line with domi and drouin.
Canes say no easily maybe that load minus the pick for Faulk and rask on retained cap though
Vegas trade is a cap dump which is very easily for Vegas to say yes to if not maybe the hams throw in a 7th.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 6:40 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>guzman</b></div><div>Should I replace slavin by faulk? Would that be more realistic?</div></div>

That would be an overpay for Faulk

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 6:38 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

3/4 trades aren't bad. Slavin trade is not close to value

Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 17, 2018 at 6:37 p.m.

Thread: Hockey world what do you think

I'm a habs fan too, but that haul is nowhere near good enough for Slavin, i can also see teams offering more for Senko tbh but quite close to fair value if u want my opinion. I'd love Kap on the habs but I just don't see Toronto trading him

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

guzman

Habs Fan

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day