SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

jordyweal

Member Since
Jul. 9, 2020
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
79
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2020 at 4:44 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 21, 2020 at 12:43 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 20, 2020 at 12:05 p.m.
Forum: Fauteuil - DGDec. 10, 2020 at 2:49 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 12, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.
Thread: How would you grade Bergevins offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DriveFor25</b></div><div>I wouldn’t have picked Guhle, but he was easily the best value pick at 16. Sure, Mercer (who is probably the only player I would of taken over Guhle anyway) filled a bigger need, but D like Guhle have gold trade value and are rare.
Anderson is a player MTL has needed for decades. A fast, talented, scoring power forward with hearth who knows where to draw the line. He is literally the perfect match for Suzuki and Drouin. Sure, we might have overpaid, but Domi didn’t have a spot on the team necessarily and Anderson is still a good top 6 goal scorer.
Edmundson is very comparable to Chiarot before he came to MTL. They are very similar players. He will probably perform similarly here. Don’t see how this is a bad contract. Even if he plays on the third pair, the $$$ value isn’t awful and he will make our D meaner (which was an issue when Weber/Chiarot wasn’t on the ice) while bringing SC experience. While Kulak-Petry was a good pair, Petry could excel offensively even more if he had a good defensive D next to him, which is what Edmundson is.</div></div>

i agree that acquiring anderson was a good move but i just think that we couldve gotten a 2nd in that deal. Edmundson is a very good player but we are way too close to the cap hit and i just think that we have enough LHD with Romanov coming.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 12, 2020 at 7:37 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 11, 2020 at 9:46 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 7, 2020 at 7:19 a.m.