SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

justin9

Member Since
Jun. 3, 2020
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
54
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2020 at 2:37 p.m.
Thread: hopeful
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Why trade Dermot? He's steady and has been forced to play with a Russian rookie, and Ceci in the past two years. Leafs don't have much NHL Dman depth, I say Dermot's a keeper especially on a. modest contract.</div></div>

If Dermott isn't working out is what I meant. If Sandin and Liljy look like studs then we should


<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>after Johnson the Leafs LW depth is a guy with 29 games, a guy who might be a 3rd liner and a raw rookie who might not be NHL ready. They dont "need" him, but trading him for a middling pick just to trade him is kinda pointless unless you are upgrading the roster somewhere else and are super crazy desparate for capspace.

After Kerfoot, the leafs literally dont have another 3C, and replacing him with a guy like Jankowski who is not even a 3rd liner on top of trading Johnsson basically guts the bottom 6 for no reason except 'but thu cap spayce!" and is a dumb move because it makes the team worse. This is a terrible downgrade for the roster</div></div>

We can afford to downgrade are offense. I would do it if its an upgrade on defense
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 18, 2020 at 7:52 p.m.
Thread: hopeful
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div><a href="/users/Boomer125" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Boomer125</a> :"Here's the reality Kerfoot is not some spare part in TO, he is their only viable 3C, so unless it's a Top 4 D . . . or a better 3C falls in their lap, I don't really see a scenario where the Leafs move Kerfoot for . . . futures which they also don't really need."

You've tried to shore up the RD by acquiring Braun, which is a good idea. But any good free agent RD is going to come at a sensible price. The realities of Toronto's economics plus the right side of the defense virtually compel trading two of your third line, which is a shame. I'm with you -- Holl, Lehtonen and Liljegren probably aren't enough to get it done.</div></div>

I think Kerfoot and Johnsson are most likely gone because

1. Robertson is gonna get a robertson (90% sure). I think Dubas has some good faith in him
2. Johnsson and Kerfoot barley played the season. We didn't have them that much and are offense was still one of the best. I think we can afford to lose both of them
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 17, 2020 at 8:20 p.m.
Thread: Several moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div>yup my thoughts as well, they arent moving Jost who is still a good serviceable NHLer player on their 3rd line for far out draft picks.
Jost can be moved but not in this style of trade, either they are getting something of value back that can impact their roster today or he is part of a bigger trade</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>moli92</b></div><div>I think COL says no, but there are other Avs fans on here who want to trade Jost so this may not be a consensus answer. *IF* they were to trade Jost for picks it would have to be picks earlier than 2022. Avs are trying to win now and picks that are 2 years away arent as useful, especially since they will probably take at least 3 years after being drafted to become useful players (if at all).</div></div>

I agree but there are not a lot of teams that are gonna give 2020 seconds since their so valuable. Especially the rebuilding teams. I decided to add a second.

But ok
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 12, 2020 at 9:34 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 3, 2020 at 2:42 p.m.