SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

n388845

Member Since
Jun. 8, 2017
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
557
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 14, 2021 at 10:53 a.m.
Thread: Dubois
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>They will get value for him or won't deal him. You saw his upside in the playoffs, he was a beast and had no off ice issues like seguin did at the time and zibanajed wasn't projected as a 1C and and a few down years prior to the trade. Pld is on the upside, it will cost you a top player or not worth it for them and they say no. They aren't rebuilding and don't want s bunch if picks and prospects. Kakko + chytyl + one of your many dmen gets it done like DeAngelo</div></div>

zib. was projected as a first line center coming off 46 and 51 point seasons at 22 years old no team is giving up there top prospect futures will definitely be involved and probably the majority of any trade realistically at best your looking at 1-2 top 100 prospects 1-2 b level prospects and 2 top picks with an nhl player to fil the void he leaves
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 7, 2021 at 8:45 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 2, 2020 at 2:15 p.m.
Thread: second attempt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>Just outta curiosity when did PLD become a franchise player? Looking at basic stats I see a 50-60 point center man that had a good playoffs this year, but is horrible at face offs... I get that he has potential to grow, etc; but if you are gonna use that argument the same thing can be said of Lundkvist, Jones and even Buch.. like PLD, stromes best season came alongside Panarin. I’m just scratching my head here. I wouldn’t trade lafreniere for PLD straight up, I could see kakko but not in such a large deal.. weird</div></div>

thats why kakko is not in the deal its buch strome lundqvist and jones buch opens a spot of kravtsov next year after the khl season and kakko takes 1st line duties while krieder takes 2nd line rw so laff can play with him and zibenejad. voronkov is a piece to make it more even. the idea here is we took zibenajad at 22 as a 50ish point player trying to do a similar deal here while signing him to a longer term to keep costs down in the future
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 27, 2020 at 1:55 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 28, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
Thread: Idk just something different
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Seider53</b></div><div>Thats the challenge of involving prospects and/or goalies on this site. Valuing them is really hard, and there isn't a precedent. You can look to the past for trades where picks are leveraged for almost anything. In this case Wings fans will know Grewe as a rat **** to play against, that needs some ice time to thrive, Rangers fans will see a disappointing stint in the SHL (likely without the context of ice time, 3-4 min per game) and working out value becomes very hard. Its a limitation of fans discussing trades.</div></div>

Exactly see i like grewe im a rangers fan but i think hes the type of player that could be a solid bottom 6 fwd who has a knack for getting under someones skin drawing penalties and being overall a solid player
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 28, 2020 at 1:25 p.m.
Thread: Idk just something different
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Seider53</b></div><div>Inspite of above people saying the wings deal is bad for the Rangers. I don't like it from a RedWings perspective. Grewe is a super intruiging prospect, who is coming to Saginaw next year, as he was getting screwed for ice time in the SHL. He's potentially a great prospect, but for that reason his value is at an all time low. Crawley was playing in the coast last year, not sure why he's included, doesn't seem like he has any value.
So its basically Georgiev and Smith for Grewe. You should probably keep Georgiev, just package up different assets to get rid of Smith. Couple picks/prospects. (before anyone tries to argue he has value to Detroit as a D, nope, we know exactly what he is, and given that he was playing forward on your 4th line at times, so do the Rangers.)</div></div>

See I figured it was closer then everyone is complaining about smith is a horrible contract but its one year i figured it would need more on the rangers side not the otherway around but i guess if both sides dont think its enough then its a viable deal