SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

quinneroma

quinneroma
Member Since
Jun. 8, 2016
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
2nd Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
Forum Posts
36
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 22, 2016 at 8:22 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2016 at 12:53 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 10, 2016 at 3:07 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>quinneroma</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>coga16</b></div><div><i>haha you think Avs would retain even the slightly salary plus a draft pick to let you off the hook for the full wideman deal.
Delete your account</i></div></div>
Why not dum dum? Wideman has one more year, Iggy has one more year, same salaries. Avs have Rantanen to take Iggy's spot, and will probably move Barrie for a high draft pick or prospects, Wideman can fill Barries spot for one year, and takes Iggys cap hit. I think it's a trade that makes sense for both teams, and the Flames are just as attractive to Iggy now as Colorado for one more year, why not give it one more year in Calgary?</i></div></div>

Wideman is not a true Top 4 dman, and the Avs have a stock pile of guys who are 3rd pairing guys (Holden, Gelinas, Beauchemin). Wideman is 5m in wasted cap space, at least iggy is useful on the PP and in a bottom 6 role. Also Wideman blocks a roster spot for Zadorov and or Bigras.

So yes it is a terrible dumb trade for the Avs</i></div></div>

Well that's where we disagree. Wideman is a 4th dman on their roster, and a very useful 2nd line PP man. He's better than Zadorov for one more year, Zadorov needs more time to develop. Anyways, not a dumb trade for the AVS, considering that (IMO) Wideman will help their team more next year than Iggy will. And vice versa for Calgary. It's all speculative anyways.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 10, 2016 at 2:09 p.m.