SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sensonfire

sensonfire
Member Since
Feb. 21, 2021
Favourite Team
Ottawa Senators
Forum Posts
10073
Posts per Day
10.6
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:21 p.m.
Thread: mbmb
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JoeROFLCOPTER</b></div><div>You're basing all of your "proofs of illegality" on a choice. Complaining about me pointing out what would happen, meanwhile you feel inclined to point out a meaningless caveat that would be resolved in a case of a Pinto trade is so extremely ironic.



Thank you for your concerns. I don't really interact with you so much, but considering you seem to think I do, I must be memorable. I'm flattered.

Toodles, now!</div></div>

1. Because if a choice made with one team violates a choice made previously with another, it's illegal.

The OP could have chose to make the 1st in the Pinto trade conditional in a way that completely respects the Bertuzzi/DeBrincat trades.

The OP chose not to do that.

I'm sorry that all of this went over your head and that you chose to project your anger at me instead.



2. Get well soon.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:10 p.m.
Thread: mbmb
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JoeROFLCOPTER</b></div><div>&gt; "Hey it's not illegal, this is how"
&gt;&gt; hurdur but it's illegal because they wouldn't do that

I gave you a definitive route that, given the fact that they could just waive the condition, it'd be legal.
You tell me that they would never do that, and hence force, all of these trades are illegal.

I'm not even playing devil's advocate; you're just wrong.
This is a legal trade.</div></div>

This is what I said word for word:



"Your trade would be illegal if we get that first from the DeBrincat trade"



There's nothing wrong with what I said here.

If Ottawa ended up with Boston's 2025 1st from the DeBrincat trade, Boston would not be able to make this trade for Pinto.

The OP to this AGM just inserted Boston's 2025 1st into this trade for Pinto and left it at that.

Didn't even bother to read the fine print or make any note of the Bertuzzi/DeBrincat trades whatsoever.



I'd also add that this trade would be illegal if Detroit gets that first from the Bertuzzi trade and decides to keep it.

But at this point, you're whining and complaining over the semantics of something that happened months ago.

Get over it.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:40 p.m.
Thread: What Anthony Di Marco also said about spending a 1st to dump Joseph
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mike7856</b></div><div>If they want Boucher they can have him lol doubt it though</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Moss_Bucket</b></div><div>Boucher will not be a payment to take Joseph, it would be a 1st in 2024 or one of the Sens better prospects. I don't know there pool except Ridley and know for a fact he's not on the menu.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Boucher doesn’t have first round value</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>Boucher was always a reach and has regressed lol i’d trade a 3rd for him he does not have a 1st value</div></div>

https://twitter.com/NathanGraviteh/status/1706355856172794165
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 1:02 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:03 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 12:02 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSat. at 8:00 p.m.