SalarySwishSalarySwish

ANA-BOS

Created by: mytduxfan
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 8, 2020
Published: Jan. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
BOS gets a 1st/2nd line goal scorer on a very cheap deal to bolster their line-up for a deep playoff run, the addition of Manson somewhat covering the loss of Carlo, + dumps a bad contract to free up space to re-sign Debrusk and Krug. This helps BOS solidify their line-up until 2022. ANA a gets younger and better RD to solidify their top pairing beyond the retool + young assets and picks.

BOS line-up after trade:

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
Rakell - Krejci - Debrusk
Heinen - Coyle - Bjork
Kuraly - Lindholm - Ritchie

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Manson
Moore - Grzelcyk

Rask - Halak
Trades
ANA
  1. Backes, David
  2. Beecher, John [Reserve List]
  3. Carlo, Brandon
  4. 2020 1st round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$61,623,118$0$2,182,500$19,876,882
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$820,000$820,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,541,000$1,541,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jan. 8, 2020 at 9:11 p.m.
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Just waiting for that one BOS fan saying something like "Beecher is off limits" or something to that effect.
Jan. 8, 2020 at 9:24 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Just waiting for that one BOS fan saying something like "Beecher is off limits" or something to that effect.


Fine. I am not tied to him, but we'd need a solid prospect coming back as a replacement to Rakell.
justaBoss liked this.
Jan. 8, 2020 at 9:41 p.m.
#3
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Ducks could do better than Carlo in a Rakell trade. Carlo is actually significantly worse than Manson in even strength Corsi this year and throughout his career. He’s younger than Manson but I don’t see the potential to be any better than him.

Idk enough about Beecher but looking at his numbers it looks like he struggled at the WJC and so far at Michigan.

Personally I just think there’s a better D to be had if Rakell is being moved.
Jan. 8, 2020 at 9:51 p.m.
#4
Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 7,002
Likes: 2,852
So you want to trade a top 6 F and a top pairing D, both entering their prime in the next couple of seasons, for a top 4 D, a cap dump, a late 1st, and a B prospect? No chance Anaheim takes this.
Jan. 9, 2020 at 12:25 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: Jah1722
Ducks could do better than Carlo in a Rakell trade. Carlo is actually significantly worse than Manson in even strength Corsi this year and throughout his career. He’s younger than Manson but I don’t see the potential to be any better than him.

Idk enough about Beecher but looking at his numbers it looks like he struggled at the WJC and so far at Michigan.

Personally I just think there’s a better D to be had if Rakell is being moved.


Fair. I think Manson has been poor this year and he wasn't that great last season. Maybe I am undervaluing him and overvaluing Carlo. I kind of view them as equivalent players, but believe that Carlo has more to bring given his age. It was just a thought. I have concerns about our back-end and don't really see a standout option via the draft. Moreover, I think we need a franchise forward or at least another potentially elite 1C option.

Thanks for the feedback though. Always appreciated!

Quoting: NickC1988
So you want to trade a top 6 F and a top pairing D, both entering their prime in the next couple of seasons, for a top 4 D, a cap dump, a late 1st, and a B prospect? No chance Anaheim takes this.


Well, Manson isn't a top pairing D. He's a top 4 that has good chemistry with Lindholm, who is a legit top pairing D-man. Manson is 28 years old, so he's already in his prime years, not just entering, and he's not exactly been that great recently. He's certainly not the Manson from a couple seasons ago. Rakell is a quality player and worth a tonne, especially given his sweetheart contract. Maybe the value is off because I am overvaluing Carlo. It's just hard to find good quality D-men and he ticks a lot of boxes i.e. young, big, good mobility, etc.
See All