The case for TB to do it:
- They get $5.9M in cap space that will allow them to easily resign there other RFA's Cernak, Sergachev, and Cirelli.
- They get a top prospect in Suzuki, who's rookie season (41 pts in 71 games) was virtually identical to Points (40 pts in 68 games).
- They get a top 10 draft pick.
- They get a decent prospect in josh Brook.
- No longer have to protect Point in the expansion draft.
The case for TB not to do it:
- Point is a big part of the team and they know what they will get from him. Will Suzuki be able to progress and replace him?
The case for MTL to do it:
- They get the best player in the deal at this time.
The case for MTL not to do it:
- Point is 24 yrs old and in his prime, while Suzuki is only 20 years old and hasn't scratched the surface yet.
- The team hasn't made the playoffs in 3 years, is replacing Suzuki with Point going to push this team over the top? If not, is it worth taking on $5.9M when they need to re-sign Gallagher, Petry, Tatar, Danault and Armia who are all UFA's. Would they not be better off keeping there 20 year old top prospect and there top 10 pick and staying patient?
- Have to protect Point in the expansion draft.
Credit to blanche for the trade and DirtyDangle for the debate.
I’m not high on Brook, Suzuki looks good, and a top 10 pick in a deep draft is great. I guess another 2 years of ELC in Suzuki would be enticing to Tampa but I still think they say no
I’m not high on Brook, Suzuki looks good, and a top 10 pick in a deep draft is great. I guess another 2 years of ELC in Suzuki would be enticing to Tampa but I still think they say no
Brook will likely become a reliable number 4 d-man
Plus Tampa could get a guy like Raymond or Perfetti which would be great for them
MTL could want this to get their offensive star, because no disrespect to KK, Caufield or Suzuki, but I don't think any of them has the potential of being an offensive star. Point is that and will be that for the next decade or so