Experimenting

Philly declines - makes no sense for them to make that trade

Think about you’re the leafs and you’re competing so to get better you make this trade. Philly is competing so why would that trade make them better you get me?

ah yes, the good old "any team" trade.

Chris Johnston and Friedman corroborated the fact that many teams were willing to give up 2nd rounders+ for johnsson, and I'd argue kerf has quite a bit more value than johnsson, given that he plays centre, is better defensively and didn't just have a season-ending knee injury (and also has a slightly better NHL resume)

ik that's literally not even close to the focus of this acgm, but still, kerf has value >: (

as for the rest of it, idk enough about the trades so I'll let others comment on that

Take out Farabee and its a fair trade

leafs decline phillie accepts.

Wild decline they don't need Holl. Just because Holl is from Minnesota doesn't mean you should trade him there. The Wild defense is already set.