SalarySwishSalarySwish

Reaching on the rebuild

Created by: Klara
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 26, 2021
Published: Feb. 26, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Keep in mind this scenario is very much a REACH, and is more a general idea of who goes where and what should be desired in return.
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Newhook, Alex [Reserve List]
  2. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Hertl, Tomas ($2,812,000 retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Honka, Anttoni [Reserve List]
  2. Suzuki, Ryan
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Or just Jarvis lol
3.
SJS
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander
Additional Details:
or a 2nd/3rd if Dubnyk plays well.

Not sure what Alexeyev's value is right now, so picks also an option.
WSH
  1. Dubnyk, Devan ($1,083,333 retained)
4.
PHI
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Burns, Brent ($4,000,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$68,323,666$0$642,500$13,176,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$735,000$735,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Taxi Squad
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 ($425,000$425K$425,000$425K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$723,333$723,333 ($0$0$0$0)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Feb. 26, 2021 at 1:45 p.m.
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
I’d like a small add to the Hertl deal but it’s fair obvi

Meier deal I don’t love but it’s not bad - I just rather a different set of prospect/ deal

But that Philly one ain’t happening York is gonna be real damn good - nothing we can do to acquire him unless you do: Meier for York and a first/ pick
Klara liked this.
Feb. 26, 2021 at 1:51 p.m.
#2
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1,881
Quoting: yikes
I’d like a small add to the Hertl deal but it’s fair obvi

Meier deal I don’t love but it’s not bad - I just rather a different set of prospect/ deal

But that Philly one ain’t happening York is gonna be real damn good


really conflicted on the Philly idea, because I think there is a good chance a team will try and pickup Burns 50% retained at the deadline, and Philadelphia just seems like the obvious destination (where Burns will accept a trade to).

Looking around, York is ranked almost equally to Merkley in most publications, so I figured it was around good value, obviously not sure if PHI would be willing to depart from him, but SJ needs more LD prospects, and York is a perfect fit.
Feb. 26, 2021 at 1:54 p.m.
#3
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
Quoting: Klara
really conflicted on the Philly idea, because I think there is a good chance a team will try and pickup Burns 50% retained at the deadline, and Philadelphia just seems like the obvious destination (where Burns will accept a trade to).

Looking around, York is ranked almost equally to Merkley in most publications, so I figured it was around good value, obviously not sure if PHI would be willing to depart from him, but SJ needs more LD prospects, and York is a perfect fit.


I’d love to see York over in teal but Burns’ age/ contract length negate a real chunk of value. If he is moved whether Seattle or wherever I think that trade is to unpredictable as not many teams will inquire on him and personally I don’t see an elite level prospect being moved is all. That’s just me but as I said I think it’s too unpredictable so I could be right or wrong.

I think Philly just has to many money worries of their own to take on burns. But hey if they did offer burns 50% for York I think I’d take them up on it haha.
Feb. 26, 2021 at 2:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: yikes
I’d like a small add to the Hertl deal but it’s fair obvi

Meier deal I don’t love but it’s not bad - I just rather a different set of prospect/ deal

But that Philly one ain’t happening York is gonna be real damn good - nothing we can do to acquire him unless you do: Meier for York and a first/ pick


Hertl only having 1 year left on his deal before UFA is tough to move Newhook for. You really are only getting him for the rest of his contract bc no way they can afford to keep him.
IMO newhook is only moved in a long term piece trade. Value is probably close but the logic behind the trade I just dont fully see it for the avs as Newhook is the only realistic long term 2C option Avs have once kadris contract is done. If you arent getting a replacement to fill hat void then its going to make a very big hole in the roster
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 26, 2021 at 2:07 p.m.
#5
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
Quoting: coga16
Hertl only having 1 year left on his deal before UFA is tough to move Newhook for. You really are only getting him for the rest of his contract bc no way they can afford to keep him.
IMO newhook is only moved in a long term piece trade. Value is probably close but the logic behind the trade I just dont fully see it for the avs.


Well it’s for this playoffs and next, and the team has many other prospects so I don’t see a hole created. I don’t see how it’s not fair because timmins + others aren’t worth it for the sharks. I think logic is there as Hertl comes at just above a 2m aav and and allows for plenty of cap flexibility for cup contender who’s adding a top 6 player; which is a very rare chance to get. Hertl also could extended but even then you’ve still got nearly 2 years to figure that out/ 1.5 y; if not win 1-2 cups while still being able to make other moves during since Hertl once again only costs 2m.
See All