SalarySwishSalarySwish

I think this is a solid lineup

Created by: Shylo_Moxii
Team: 2021-22 Seattle Kraken
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 31, 2021
Published: Jul. 31, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
1$1,000,000
2$4,000,000
2$850,000
2$930,000
2$845,000
2$825,000
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
2023
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
2024
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the SEA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$65,156,666$0$0$16,343,334

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,940,000$2,940,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,900,000$5,900,000
G
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 31, 2021 at 5:45 a.m.
#1
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,272
Likes: 11,348
It's really not, and I think Francis has done a very bad job so far even with a handful of good snares. The center stable is just sad (this team will be scraping the bottom in faceoff %, but hey at least he has 32 LDs!), the O zone creativity is almost non-existent, the sniping ability is equally spare and the D has a couple of major sink hole warning spots. This is not a $72M roster.
jpsnow13 liked this.
Jul. 31, 2021 at 6:04 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: mokumboi
It's really not, and I think Francis has done a very bad job so far even with a handful of good snares. The center stable is just sad (this team will be scraping the bottom in faceoff %, but hey at least he has 32 LDs!), the O zone creativity is almost non-existent, the sniping ability is equally spare and the D has a couple of major sink hole warning spots. This is not a $72M roster.


This is a lazy take. Their center lineup is... it's not great at the top end but it's there throughout the lineup. I might be able to speak more highly of Geekie than others because being a Canes fan, I have seen more of him. He's really solid as a 4th liner, and can play both special team units. Was improving in the dot under Rod too.

Berniers will be in experienced, but Wennberg and Gourde are both good middle 6 C's, and can certainly play the kind of role for this team Danault, Kotkaniemi and Suzuki did for Montreal did this summer.
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Jul. 31, 2021 at 6:19 a.m.
#3
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,272
Likes: 11,348
Quoting: Caniac2000
This is a lazy take. Their center lineup is... it's not great at the top end but it's there throughout the lineup. I might be able to speak more highly of Geekie than others because being a Canes fan, I have seen more of him. He's really solid as a 4th liner, and can play both special team units. Was improving in the dot under Rod too.

Berniers will be in experienced, but Wennberg and Gourde are both good middle 6 C's, and can certainly play the kind of role for this team Danault, Kotkaniemi and Suzuki did for Montreal did this summer.



Heh. It's a Cpt. Obvious take is more like it.

You call Gourde and Wennberg middle 6 centers, which is quite the exaggeration. Even if it was true, they are being asked to be 1C and 2C. This is way over their heads, as Gourde is really a winger and Wennberg hasn't been a real impact player for like four seasons now. As for Geekie, he has plenty of nice tools, which would be amazing if he wasn;t such a poor skater. This has obviously held him back, and presumably will continue to do so. Early evidence indicates he's an AHL-er.

Long story short, comparing these guys to KK, Danault and Suzuki is silly. The C spot is a huge problem for this team. How that can be argued with a straight face is beyond me.
Jul. 31, 2021 at 6:25 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. It's a Cpt. Obvious take is more like it.

You call Gourde and Wennberg middle 6 centers, which is quite the exaggeration. Even if it was true, they are being asked to be 1C and 2C. This is way over their heads, as Gourde is really a winger and Wennberg hasn't been a real impact player for like four seasons now. As for Geekie, he has plenty of nice tools, which would be amazing if he wasn;t such a poor skater. This has obviously held him back, and presumably will continue to do so. Early evidence indicates he's an AHL-er.

Long story short, the C spot is a huge problem for this team. How that can be argued with a straight face is beyond me.


Geekie's skating is not poor... hell, in his NHL debut he skates the blade of Evgenii Malkin and the Penguins as he put up 3 points in his first game.

Gourde played C in Tampa and did it very successfully with Coleman and Goodrow on either side. He's always done that very effectively, and he's very capable as a middle-six C. He's going to be asked to play as a 1C, which isn't ideal, but it's worth a shot. Wennberg has had success as a middle-six center, and is going to be asked to do the same in Seattle. It's something he did in Columbus, and he did it well. Not fantastically, but well enough.

This C core is not as weak as you suggest, and how you can think otherwise makes me question you a lot.
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Jul. 31, 2021 at 7:45 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 202
Likes: 26
This is not a great team but I think Francis is doing it right? Cap space is King right now. He will eventually trade some of these guys to contenders for draft picks and assets, Giordano, Gourde, Danskoi, and Larson should net nice returns at the trade deadline.
See All