canadiens grades

Personally, for me just swap Rem with Dauphin.

probably could agree on rem being in grade B as well, because of his hot start, but he did cool down.
and dauphin as well sorta had that too, but to a lesser extent. he was expected to be mainly a fringe 4C though (with the injuries) which is why he's in good

no one on the Habs was 'unbelievable' this year. Suzuki and Caufield ( post Ducharme ) played up to expectations. Several players rated 'good' underperformed IMO.
I would rank many in the 'good' category as very 'average' , for example Anderson on some nights was very good and on other nights very bad. Also not sure how Drouin gets a 'good' sure he was injured half the year but when he played he was just ok , no where near the player they envisioned when they traded for him. I won't get into details on others but you set the bar too low.

I just didn't think Dauphin did anything that impressed much.

For a team that finished last in the NHL, these rankings seems too positive...