SalarySwishSalarySwish

Same goal Different Strategy

Created by: Sagecoll
Team: 2022-23 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 17, 2022
Published: Jun. 28, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
General Concept: In spite of advancing well into the playoffs primarily on the back of elite goaltending and special teams (Similar to the mid 2010's AV run squads), Rangers 5v5 play was very poor. They were bottom 5 in the league in several 5v5 metrics measuring possession scoring chances, etc.

From the data tracking and video tape it became clear that most of the problems were starting from the back end and in transition. NYR were one of the worst in the league at conceding the blue line, had the 2nd most zone clears in the league, and were towards the bottom of the league in terms of exiting the zone with control and entering the offensive zone with control.
In practice, what that looks like (which should be all too familiar to Ranger fans) is the opposition easily getting into our zone, firing off a bunch of shots, Igor doing heroic work to keep them out of our goal, and a dman chipping the puck out to center for the same thing to happen all over again.
The fix is pretty simple tbh, revamp the back end to feature Dmen who can handle the puck under pressure and move it with control. As well as replacing the bottom 6 with players who can also control the puck effectively while doing all the stuff you'd expect a 4th line to do. I think this roster accomplishes that.


Trade Rationale:
1) Lindgren and Sanheim with extension value is pretty comparable. Lindgren also fits the Torts mold a bit better. Goodrow vs. Laughton is also pretty close, Laughton brings a bit more offensively. Goodrow brings more flexibility in the lineup and positionally, he's been healthier and has considerably more playoff experience. Reaves evens out the edges.
2) Buffalo needs some goaltending, Georgiev's record as a starter is very impressive. This avoids the need for a big swing on a UFA goaltender that almost never works out. Cost avoids any significant draft picks or prospects for Buffalo. Mutually beneficial.
3, Arizona avoids a large portion of Schmaltz's heavily back loaded contract and gets a better D prospect than they'd get for just about anyone not named Chychrun. They open up even more cap space so ownership can take on more dead weight for their never ending tank.
4. Trouba goes back to the midwest and Burke/Hexstall gets the big all situations Dman they crave. Price is actually a bit below market value -> This is less than what Risto got. Seattle takes on less than a mil in retention to go get what for them is a top 6 winger. Pitt still has enough cap left at that point to keep at least one of Tang/Malkin if not both.
5. Chicago avoids having to send a sweetener to take Toews and nets a 2nd and Blais who slides into their 3rd line in the process. This is a bit more than what Keith got. Additional picks and stuff to make cap work.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,450,000
3$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
1$1,250,000
3$2,850,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Laughton, Scott
  2. Sanheim, Travis
Additional Details:
Sanheim signs ~5.5mil x 6 extension.
2.
NYR
  1. Asplund, Rasmus
  2. 2022 4th round pick (BUF)
BUF
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [RFA Rights]
3.
NYR
  1. Schmaltz, Nick ($1,850,000 retained)
ARI
  1. Schneider, Braden
  2. 2022 4th round pick (BUF)
4.
NYR
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 1st round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
3way Deal:

NYR gets: Pit 1st + Will Borgen
Pitt gets: Trouba (750k retained by Seattle)
Seattle gets: Kapanen
5.
6.
NYR
  1. Toews, Jonathan ($5,250,000 retained)
CHI
  1. Blais, Samuel
  2. Nemeth, Patrik
  3. 2023 6th round pick (WPG)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$79,024,802$0$4,100,000$3,475,198

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,450,000$2,450,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$875,000$875,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$825,000$825,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,675,000$4,675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 3
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jun. 28, 2022 at 2:16 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 327
Likes: 232
Buffalo doesn't even look at the phone
wojme, mac11_716, Shibbal18 and 2 others liked this.
Jun. 28, 2022 at 2:18 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,686
Likes: 5,901
Easy decline from the sabres. "Georgiev's record as a starter is very impressive" but his stats aren't.
Bond007, Shibbal18, sabres89 and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 28, 2022 at 2:20 p.m.
#3
Funksoljah
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 1,222
Georgievs record is far from impressive, and treating Asplund like a toss in is silly. Asplund is an important player for the Sabres and is one of their best defensive forwards, they won't deal him for a goalie who wasn't much better than the 6 others they had to play this past season. Asplund is more valuable to Buffalo than to another team.
Bond007, Shibbal18, wojme and 2 others liked this.
Jun. 28, 2022 at 2:31 p.m.
#4
who? what?
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 202
Likes: 35
Philly is definitely out on this. I get the Laughton/Goodrow comparison. No way Lindgren and Reaves equals Sanheim.
Farabee liked this.
Jun. 28, 2022 at 2:36 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: Funksoljah
Georgievs record is far from impressive, and treating Asplund like a toss in is silly. Asplund is an important player for the Sabres and is one of their best defensive forwards, they won't deal him for a goalie who wasn't much better than the 6 others they had to play this past season. Asplund is more valuable to Buffalo than to another team.


If he was a toss in, the pick would be a 2nd. Again, as a starter (under 4 days rest) Georgiev's numbers were pretty great and have been any time he's in that scenario for his entire career. Asplund's no throw in, but to act like Georgiev doesn't immediately slot into #1 on the depth chart displays a lack of understanding of the position.
See All