SalarySwishSalarySwish

Big Push

Created by: Ollie79
Team: 2022-23 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 23, 2023
Published: Jan. 23, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This trade goes down at deadline. Unfortunately I know the Flames and they will not rebuild so they go for it. Some work to do in summer to fit this contract in but just means we have to make some moves! He would be the perfect goal scoring threat this team needs.
Trades
CGY
  1. Meier, Timo
Additional Details:
Agree upon 7 years 9 million aav contract extension for Meier.
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$69,678,333$0$200,000$12,821,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,900,000$5,900,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$827,500$827,500
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$912,500$912,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jan. 23, 2023 at 12:10 p.m.
#1
Save Mcdavid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 1,253
I dont know if this contract can be done?

The cap only goes up by 1 mil next year and weegar adds 4.5 mil to his deal, meier would add 3 mil and huberdeau adds 5.6 mil. Your only losing around 2 mil in expiring deals (which include some depth guys which you need to resign/replace). I don't think this can get done Calgary can barely afford Weegar and Huberdeau going into next year and that's with losing assets for cap reasons (Backlund, Zadorov, etc.)
Jan. 23, 2023 at 12:19 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,575
Likes: 19,706
Meier is bot worth more than 8.5M, but even at that price Calgary can't fit him inder the cap next year. Mangiapane has been excellent since being reunited with Backlund and Coleman, he's not going anywhere
Jan. 23, 2023 at 12:34 p.m.
#3
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 872
SJ has not interest in any of those players
Jan. 24, 2023 at 1:02 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 28
Likes: 7
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Meier is bot worth more than 8.5M, but even at that price Calgary can't fit him inder the cap next year. Mangiapane has been excellent since being reunited with Backlund and Coleman, he's not going anywhere


Wrong on the 1st two points (at least you're persistent when it comes to Meier proposals). You are right on the 3rd point.

Meier is absolutely worth more than $8.5M. We were more than happy to give Huberdeau $10.5M, but we think Timo Meier isn't worth more than $8.5M?

And yes, they can afford it. You can exceed the cap by 10% in the off-season. You move out worse players. 10 guys are on expiring contracts next year. There is a zero percent chance all 10 are more important than Meier (let alone any, save for maybe Lindholm), and a zero percent chance all 10 would be extended beyond next year anyways. Start there.

But ideally, yes, you make the deal without including Andrew Mangiapane. Add now with as little subtraction of key current players as possible.
Jan. 24, 2023 at 1:48 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,575
Likes: 19,706
Quoting: TheSummerofGeorge
Wrong on the 1st two points (at least you're persistent when it comes to Meier proposals). You are right on the 3rd point.

Meier is absolutely worth more than $8.5M. We were more than happy to give Huberdeau $10.5M, but we think Timo Meier isn't worth more than $8.5M?

And yes, they can afford it. You can exceed the cap by 10% in the off-season. You move out worse players. 10 guys are on expiring contracts next year. There is a zero percent chance all 10 are more important than Meier (let alone any, save for maybe Lindholm), and a zero percent chance all 10 would be extended beyond next year anyways. Start there.

But ideally, yes, you make the deal without including Andrew Mangiapane. Add now with as little subtraction of key current players as possible.


Alright your new so I'll break this down for you.

Point 1: lets look at some comparable fairly recently signed players to Timo Meier in terms of production and overall impact that were RFA's at the time of their deals. Fiala (7.8M, 9.5% of cap at signing), Nylander (6.96M, 8.76%), Kyrou (8.125M, 9.7% starting next year). Meier is an RFA at the end of this season, he is not a UFA that can demand a huge pay or walk elsewhere. He is also not remotely the same caliber player as Huberdeau despite his struggles this year, he was still well over a ppg for 4 seasons straight. There is no chance you can ever convince me Meier is worth more than 10% of the cap as a player that has never finished above a ppg and is an RFA in the offseason.

Point 2: Exceeding that cap in the offseason is irrelevant because you have to be cap compliant by day 1 of the regular season. Lets look at that list of 11* players currently with 2 years remaining in order of greatest cap hit: Backlund, Hanifin, Lindholm, Tanev, Toffoli, Zadorov, Kylington, Dube, Rooney, Pelletier, Ruzicka. Pelletier and Ruzicka are coming off ELC's and almost certainly get raises. Backlund, Hanifin, and Tanev all have relevant No Trade Clauses so they are hard to move (and none of them should be anyways since they are all extremely important to the roster). Lindholm is the Flames 1C so thats out of question. Toffoli has very similar production to Meier for nearly half the price of his next deal. So that leaves Zadorov, Dube (RFA), and Kylington. Calgary is already projected to have just under 1.8M cap and 18 players signed next year (that is the core listed on Sportrac, it does not include any of rookies except Ruzicka). Assuming Rooney 100% gets dumped (pretty much guaranteed) that will add an extra 1.3M but then an extra roster spot needs to be filled. The point I'm making here is we probably still have to move cap out in the summer to just be compliant.

If your argument is that we can fit him in if we do major roster surgery and don't care about anyone like Vegas or a video game then sure but that's not remotely realistic and a complete waste of time to debate. We could fit EK65 too by that logic. The point is we cannot effectively fit him under the cap without completing butchering our depth.
See All