SalarySwishSalarySwish

Players I would move if a first round loss

Created by: Carleton
Team: 2024-25 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 23, 2024
Published: Apr. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Trades
1.
TOR
    I've defended Marner black and blue. But I can't anymore. One of the most talented wingers in the league all regular season but is a total wash come playoff time. 10m to be completely invisible these past two games to the point where I'm wondering if he even played.

    There's a narrative on CF that teams wouldn't want to trade for Marner cause he has a year left, doubt it. He would definitely be getting shipped out
    2.
    TOR
      2.4m for a 4C with no offensive upside is insane. What kind of salvia did Tree smoke before making this deal?
      3.
      TOR
        While I definitely think Toronto needed to get a bit tougher, this Reaves contract was brutal. Plenty of grit guys could be had for league min and you chose Reaves at 1.3???
        4.
        TOR
          Mid bottom 6 guy. Don't need him
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2024
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the NSH
          Logo of the VAN
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the OTT
          2025
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          2026
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          Logo of the TOR
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          12$87,700,000$52,398,334$0$0$35,301,666
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $925,000$925,000
          LW, RW
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $13,250,000$13,250,000
          C
          NMC
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,350,000$1,350,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $11,000,000$11,000,000
          C, LW
          NMC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $11,500,000$11,500,000
          RW
          NMC
          UFA - 8
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $800,000$800,000
          C, LW
          RFA - 1
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $7,500,000$7,500,000
          LD
          NMC
          UFA - 6
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,100,000$1,100,000
          RD
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $766,667$766,667
          G
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $2,000,000$2,000,000
          LD/RD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $1,350,000$1,350,000
          LD
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
          $856,667$856,667
          RD
          RFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight

          Top Comments

          Apr. 23 at 12:16 p.m.
          #1
          Avid Sports Fan
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jan. 2019
          Posts: 942
          Likes: 261
          To comment on players. First Reaves, his contract seems high but it was actually signed with the ability to drop him to the minors and clear 1.1 million in cap space. Also his play has been great since coming back from injury. As for Kampf, he does have offensive upside but only as a 4c and still not worth 2.4 million. Of he was signed between 1.5 and 1.75, I would not complain. Either way it is a guy I am willing to let go of. Ditto for Jarnkrok. He is paid good for his services as a 3rd line winger capable or 15-20 goals and great defensively but he is also replaceable. So saving is salary is good too.

          As for Marner, same goes as I said for Nylander. We would need an equivalent winger posting 82-100 points back or a true top 2 defenseman coming back. With Nylander he was apparently dangled and no one offered a comparable defenseman back. It was all futures based and our winning timeline is within 4-5 years most likely so a futures based deal is not feasible when considering it usually takes 4-5 years to develop.cant work the trade prior to UFA without knowing whom we can sign and if we sign first, then we look desperate and team may lower the offers for Marner.

          All told I am fine with trading Marner just don't see the feasibility.
          palhal liked this.
          Apr. 23 at 12:19 p.m.
          #2
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Feb. 2023
          Posts: 944
          Likes: 402
          Quoting: hockeynutter
          .As for Marner, same goes as I said for Nylander. We would need an equivalent winger posting 82-100 points back or a true top 2 defenseman coming back. With Nylander he was apparently dangled and no one offered a comparable defenseman back. It was all futures based and our winning timeline is within 4-5 years most likely so a futures based deal is not feasible when considering it usually takes 4-5 years to develop.cant work the trade prior to UFA without knowing whom we can sign and if we sign first, then we look desperate and team may lower the offers for Marner.

          All told I am fine with trading Marner just don't see the feasibility.


          Half our D core is comprised of 6th defenders. Bush, Benoit, Edmundson. We need legitimate help on the back end. Somebody like Tanev would have been stellar, even big Z.

          If we're moving Marner, it should be for a big add on the back end + a young forward.
          Apr. 23 at 12:30 p.m.
          #3
          Avid Sports Fan
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jan. 2019
          Posts: 942
          Likes: 261
          Quoting: Carleton
          Half our D core is comprised of 6th defenders. Bush, Benoit, Edmundson. We need legitimate help on the back end. Somebody like Tanev would have been stellar, even big Z.

          If we're moving Marner, it should be for a big add on the back end + a young forward.


          I totally agree and hence the comment. Nylander was not offered anything close to that according to reports. If that is true, hen we can think similar for Marner making a trade with him seemingly unlikely for what would make it worth it. Our defence has strengths but yes comprised of mostly 4-6 defenders. Reilly is on most cup teams considered to 2-3. So can he be a 1, potentially with the depth. MCabe is at best a 3. Liljegren is at best a 4 but young and still developing yes defenders grow to like age 28 for primes for some.
          If that works that leaves us with missing another 1-2 defenceman. That could be good but now we need depth as injuries happen so need a defender capable of playing 3-5 in D range. Benoit, Lyubushkin, Edmundson Brodie, Gio are all 4-6 or lower ranger Defenders.
          This yes, our D core needs improvement. And improvement is not just big Z or Tanev. We acquired similar players while yes overall lesser and our D has no improved. Going back from our Sandin trade, we could not move the puck out of our zone as puck movers are needed too. Hence why we tried Klingberg but that was a colossal failure. We need more of a Pesce, Skjej, Montour. A good capable defender preferably right handed that can also move the puck.
          Apr. 23 at 1:12 p.m.
          #4
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jan. 2022
          Posts: 835
          Likes: 371
          Kampf has been exactly what they signed up for. Defensive C who can play PK, and with the right wingers can be effective on the forecheck-- his job is not to be a 20+ goal scorer.
          Reaves - also what they expected. He's been great in the the 2 playoff games so far, but is not an every day NHLer-- he is still the definition of enforcer who can be effective downlow on forecheck.
          Jarnkrok is a $2.1 utility player that you can trust in all situations- and Keefe loves him for it.
          --None of these contracts should be an issue-- but with money tied up elsewhere they seem cumbersome.

          Marner isn't going anywhere-- dictated by his contract if nothing else. His turnovers have been baffling at times, and he has been difficult to watch a lot this year, even when producing.
          palhal and hockeynutter liked this.
          Apr. 23 at 1:55 p.m.
          #5
          LongtimeLeafsufferer
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jul. 2015
          Posts: 59,770
          Likes: 22,800
          The usual non thinking straight. Kampf isn't waiving to a non playoff team with cap. By the way, Kampf as many goals as any Leafs player this playoffs.
          Same with Jarnkrok. He has M NTC also. Jarnkrok at 2.1m is fair value
          Reaves, if he such bad value, the Leafs can just bury him with minimal cap hit. But since he has been playing regularly, he has been fine.
          NMC Marner being traded is not logical at all. Not resigning him, I understand.
          See All