SalarySwishSalarySwish

Ideas from the Athletic

Created by: blowing_the_zone
Team: 2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 5, 2018
Published: Aug. 7, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Threw together this roster based off a few recent articles from the Athletic.

1. Apparently my eye test has been accurate. Turns out that based on advanced stats (albiet based on a small sample size) that Josh Leivo is pretty damn good. Good enough to be in the top 9, and given the chance he's a likely candidate for a breakout season.

2. They made a great case for the leafs going with 3 c and 7 d. It gives JT, Matthews and Kadri the ice time they need, keeps a top flight center on the ice at all times and creates interesting options to address the D in-house. It also allows for Nylander to take the odd shift at C and keeps Lindholm and Ennis as press box depth options.

3. It also turns out that the leafs might already have their 1RD. Reilly has experience there and based on a good sized sample, when he's paired with Gardiner on the left they've been a top 5 d pairing in the NHL. Also, based on his first half season, Dermot is good. Like, really good. And he proved that while spending most of his time playing with Polack. He might be just what Zaitsev needs in a partner in order to have a bounce back season. Finally, based on the advanced stats, Hainsey should really be used as a bottom pairing guy and pk specialist. That leaves one of Carrick, Holl or Oz in the press box with the other two getting limited minutes and pk time.

I think they're all interesting and well supported ideas that the Athletic puts forward. And it works well with the cap this year, allowing performance bonuses to be paid out and Horton to be on the opening night roster, which is important for next year's cap, as Palhal does well to remind us.

Will this happen? I doubt it. But I'd love to see them try it. What do you think?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Bonus, Performance
1$5,400,000
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$79,500,000$79,008,333$2,550,000$5,400,000$491,667

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 6
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 1
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Bonus, Performance
$5,400,000$5,400,000
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Aug. 7, 2018 at 10:22 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 665
Likes: 173
On point #2...can people get off this idea already? This is all anybody wants to talk about and it isn't going to work. It's like the whole sign JT to a 1 year max and then 8 long term. Another stupid idea proposed that people are taking way too far. You really think the Leafs are going to be a better hockey team running all three centres 20+ minutes a game, playing all situations? These guys would be fried in the second half of the season. It may happen for a game or 2 because of an in-game injury but there is no way an NHL is going to run this line combo continuously.
Herms17 liked this.
Aug. 7, 2018 at 10:42 a.m.
#2
Pass it to Lucic
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 467
Quoting: Goldendelicious
On point #2...can people get off this idea already? This is all anybody wants to talk about and it isn't going to work. It's like the whole sign JT to a 1 year max and then 8 long term. Another stupid idea proposed that people are taking way too far. You really think the Leafs are going to be a better hockey team running all three centres 20+ minutes a game, playing all situations? These guys would be fried in the second half of the season. It may happen for a game or 2 because of an in-game injury but there is no way an NHL is going to run this line combo continuously.


Personally I hope they do this. I want the Leafs to be burnt out by Feb.
Aug. 7, 2018 at 10:42 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 1,540
I don't know, last I checked 60/3 = 20, not 20 plus. And factor in pks (which matthews and kadri dont do, and JT might not as a leaf), throw in the odd shift for Willy at C and you're probably looking at 20 for JT (less than his usual atoi) 19 for Matthews (which is far from over kill) and maybe 18 for kadri (which isn't much of an increase). But you're probably right, as you articulated so elegantly and thoughtfully, it's stupid .. those people at the Athletic are real idiots I guess?! Lol. Ease up man! This fake gm game is just for fun. Babcock and Dubas aren't going over these threads looking for insights..
Aug. 7, 2018 at 10:55 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 665
Likes: 173
Quoting: leafy_business
I don't know, last I checked 60/3 = 20, not 20 plus. And factor in pks (which matthews and kadri dont do, and JT might not as a leaf), throw in the odd shift for Willy at C and you're probably looking at 20 for JT (less than his usual atoi) 19 for Matthews (which is far from over kill) and maybe 18 for kadri (which isn't much of an increase). But you're probably right, as you articulated so elegantly and thoughtfully, it's stupid .. those people at the Athletic are real idiots I guess?! Lol. Ease up man! This fake gm game is just for fun. Babcock and Dubas aren't going over these threads looking for insights..


Its been thrown around far too often that people think its actually a possibility.
Aug. 7, 2018 at 11:54 a.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,926
Likes: 22,913
Kinda strange how so many folks don't think the Leafs have four NHL Dmen and now they want to play seven in a game.
Playing seven Dmen a game really isn't an advantage over six. What I would like the Leafs to do thought is to half more of game rotation of their bottom two or three guys so they all get ice time during the season. It creates a hole when a play sits for three weeks and then has to play because a player is injured. Hard to get up to NHL speed that way.
GenXHockey liked this.
See All