SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Interesting Idea

Created by: ithical
Team: 2017-18 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 23, 2017
Published: Nov. 23, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Thoughts on this are that BM would want a cost controlled forward for any trade when it would be a rental. Toronto needs a defender Ducks could use young talent and center depth for a playoff run. Sosh will not get much time on the Leafs and he is a good penalty killer. I figure he could be a good replacement for Cogs down the road and have Silf play the left side.
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2019
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$75,000,000$62,548,416$0$975,000$12,451,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
$8,625,000$8,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 1
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
UFA - 1
$4,200,000$4,200,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$670,000$670,000
RW
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
RW
UFA - 1
$637,500$637,500
RW, C
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 2
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 5
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 23, 2017 at 9:16 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 229
Not sure on the trade. Swap Montour and Larsson. Swap Vermette and Wagner
Nov. 23, 2017 at 9:25 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Ithical
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 32
Likes: 11
Edited Nov. 23, 2017 at 9:37 p.m.
Montour needs to get away from Cam. It does not suit them well enough. BM/RC need to spread out the defensive production. Also, Wagner is a righty. I guess I could switch Grant with Wagner but Grant has the better production.
Nov. 23, 2017 at 10:36 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 429
Likes: 99
I'm kind of shocked a Ducks fan posted this. As a Leafs fan I make this deal with no hesitation.

Maybe it's closer if Bozak isn't on an expiring deal but I just don't see this as very good for you guys.
Nov. 24, 2017 at 12:41 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Ithical
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 32
Likes: 11
Call me more realistic.. Vatenan can be replaced by Montour. Ducks are in a more win-now mode then others may think and we need younger players moving forward. I see this as a win-win.
Nov. 24, 2017 at 2:45 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 430
Likes: 60
Quoting: ithical
Call me more realistic.. Vatenan can be replaced by Montour. Ducks are in a more win-now mode then others may think and we need younger players moving forward. I see this as a win-win.


Except Vatanen helps you win more than Bozak. You're trading a 20+ minute all situation D with term for a guy who will be a 3c when we're healthy and he doesnt even have a contract beyond this year. If they Ducks add bozak it will be for Futures that the Ducks could recoup in the summer by trading Vatanen then.
Nov. 24, 2017 at 3:04 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
For the last time Vatanen isn't going to be dealt for a pending UFA? And Bozak is a pending UFA.
Nov. 24, 2017 at 3:52 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 462
Quoting: Garitjax
Quoting: ithical
Call me more realistic.. Vatenan can be replaced by Montour. Ducks are in a more win-now mode then others may think and we need younger players moving forward. I see this as a win-win.


Except Vatanen helps you win more than Bozak. You're trading a 20+ minute all situation D with term for a guy who will be a 3c when we're healthy and he doesnt even have a contract beyond this year. If they Ducks add bozak it will be for Futures that the Ducks could recoup in the summer by trading Vatanen then.


This. It's terrible for the Ducks. I don't think Bozak can be had by ANA for anything realistic. This is a great draft year, so I don't see BM moving our 1st for a rental. Anything less then that and TOR says "no" because they know they can get it at the TDL. Anyway, right now, TOR are in a playoff spot and don't look like sellers anyway.

I think we should get a more long term option by trading Larsson for a young, cost-controlled C with 2C potential. He really is expendable with Lindholm, Fowler and Megna on the left side moving forward.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll