Just my personal thoughts as OP on the comments:
Quoting: joshelkin
It's really not a bad offer, but I'd want Tage Thompson. "B" prospects aren't enough even in a rental situation. JT is a top player in the league. Admittedly I don't know a ton about STL prospects, so feel free to remove someone. The contingency with Thomas should stay.
It would be tough to include Thompson or Kostin in any trade because they fill great needs for STL's lineup.
Quoting: palhal
I don't if those are the players the Isles would want. And is now twice injured Fabbri going to recover. As an Islander, I want to players were are NHLer or near NHLers so I can sell tickets next year, not those picks. And I would "punish" St Louis for resigning Tavares, since the Isles want him back.
Kostin, Dunn and 1st. If St Louis resigns JT Thomas and Krykov are added.
I'd be okay with your version of the deal.
Quoting: Chopper02
No to the Thomas portion. Maybe Thompson, Barbashev, 2019 first, Fabbri if he resigns.
The thing is, if JT91 is signed, then Thomas is redundant. Bergy is a highly capable 3C, Tavares is a solid 1C, and Barbashev shows the 2-way play to 2C.
Quoting: Turner33
If I was Armstrong I'd make a good enough offer to have the right to negotiate with JT. Tell him he's going to be a blue next year, and we don't want to hurt our future in any way. So he can wait or strong arm NYI into doing a deal for cheap ( see Stanton) .
Maybe I'm just overly patient (we've already waited 50+ yrs) I'll just take him in the offseason
I'm also cool with waiting, but a line-up with this center depth is...
Quoting: ricochetii
I don't remember any instances of conditional players. Future considerations perhaps, but I'm not sure that has ever resulted in a first round draftee being exchanged.
So if Tavares re-signs, we'll trade you Thomas for a 1st.
Or we'll give you Thomas and make the 1st conditional.
Can anyone give an example of using a conditional player to make a trade instead?
I have no examples, however, future considerations is a thing. I consider myself well read on the CBA but I have no clue if what I proposed is legal.
On that note, I do not know if Fabbri can even be traded. That was just a deal sweetener anyway due to STL's LW depth. Could replace Fabbri with another B level prospect or B level RFA like Jaskin.