SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pacioretty Trade

Created by: CaptainFlynnt
Team: 2017-18 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 4, 2018
Published: Feb. 4, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. Mahura, Josh
  2. Steel, Sam
  3. 2018 1st round pick (ANA)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the LAK
2019
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$75,000,000$48,042,499$0$607,500$26,957,501
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,900,000$4,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 6
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$839,166$839,166
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
$650,000$650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 2
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$725,000$725,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
$725,000$725,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
$6,500,000$6,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
$748,333$748,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 9
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
$912,500$912,500
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 4, 2018 at 3:13 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,882
Likes: 8,874
Ducks have said they won’t move Steel.
Feb. 4, 2018 at 4:12 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 462
Been suggested many times. Ducks say no on Steel. The value is pretty off IMO. Patches should get a similar return to what Ryan got.
Feb. 4, 2018 at 4:26 p.m.
#3
Rational Fan(atic)
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 389
Likes: 70
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ducks have said they won’t move Steel.


Is it really something that someone in the organization has said or are Ducks fans trying to speak it into existence?
CaptainFlynnt liked this.
Feb. 4, 2018 at 9:23 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 384
Quoting: Campa96
Is it really something that someone in the organization has said or are Ducks fans trying to speak it into existence?


I heard from a buddy who knows someone that said this exact trade is apparently in the works.

This is the exact type of return I would expect for a player like pacioretty. Just imagine a playmaker like getzlaf with a shooter like pacioretty.
Feb. 4, 2018 at 9:26 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 384
Edited Feb. 4, 2018 at 9:36 p.m.
Quoting: mytduxfan
Been suggested many times. Ducks say no on Steel. The value is pretty off IMO. Patches should get a similar return to what Ryan got.


Pacioretty doesn't get traded for less than this. Steel is a 20 yr old still playing junior, pacioretty is an Elite goal scorer.
Feb. 4, 2018 at 10:31 p.m.
#6
Molson beer is meh
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 1,806
Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
Pacioretty doesn't get traded for less than this. Steel is a 20 yr old still playing junior, pacioretty is an Elite goal scorer.


I think this is the crossroad we are at. I honestly think that what we Habs fans are asking in return is a high price, but that it might actually be less than what Bergefail is really asking for for Patches.

But also, other fans are justified that they don’t want to give up their best prospects for what would realistically be 1 1/2 seasons and 2 playoff pushes of Pacioretty.

So this is precisely why Pacioretty hasn’t been traded yet, and probably won’t be unless someone is willing to give up their best prospects. And it makes sense, Patches is still signed next year. Bergefail is in no rush to settle on a lesser deal.
Feb. 6, 2018 at 5:19 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 462
Quoting: Campa96
Is it really something that someone in the organization has said or are Ducks fans trying to speak it into existence?


Pointless remark. I mean, if you want to play it like that, has anyone in the ANA organisation even acknowledged interest in Patches? Or even stated that top prospects are available? The burden of proof is on you to prove that GMBM is even entertaining the idea of moving not 1, but 2 top prospects + a 1st (that is currently a lottery pick) for Patches, not on us to disprove it.

In defence of us “Duck fans”, the belief that “we” have that Steel isn’t available is founded on sound logic based on GMBM’s track-record (he’s never moved a top prospects for a player, let alone 2), we actually need Steel to replace Getzlaf eventually i.e. he’s not an expendable asset, we have other issues to address (namely Bieksa), and the fact that we’re not in a playoff position to even exploit the addition of Patches. Sorry to bring your fantasy crashing down, but this is the reality of the situation.

Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
I heard from a buddy who knows someone that said this exact trade is apparently in the works.

This is the exact type of return I would expect for a player like pacioretty. Just imagine a playmaker like getzlaf with a shooter like pacioretty.


“A buddy who knows someone” = not a legitimate source. The use of the word “apparently” = an assertion based on little/no evidence.

Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
Pacioretty doesn't get traded for less than this. Steel is a 20 yr old still playing junior, pacioretty is an Elite goal scorer.


Fine, you keep him. Steel isn’t available and we are not even in a playoff spot to need him.

Quoting: Blazingbat11
I think this is the crossroad we are at. I honestly think that what we Habs fans are asking in return is a high price, but that it might actually be less than what Bergefail is really asking for for Patches.

But also, other fans are justified that they don’t want to give up their best prospects for what would realistically be 1 1/2 seasons and 2 playoff pushes of Pacioretty.

So this is precisely why Pacioretty hasn’t been traded yet, and probably won’t be unless someone is willing to give up their best prospects. And it makes sense, Patches is still signed next year. Bergefail is in no rush to settle on a lesser deal.


You, my friend, get it. If this is the price of Patches, I have a hard time seeing Patches moved. Personally, I don’t think MTL is that committed to the rebuild (probably more of a retool). If I have misjudged that and they are, then Patches will he moved at the TDL, but for either a similar package not containing a top C prospect or just a lesser package.
Feb. 6, 2018 at 7:12 p.m.
#8
Rational Fan(atic)
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 389
Likes: 70
Quoting: mytduxfan
Pointless remark. I mean, if you want to play it like that, has anyone in the ANA organisation even acknowledged interest in Patches? Or even stated that top prospects are available? The burden of proof is on you to prove that GMBM is even entertaining the idea of moving not 1, but 2 top prospects + a 1st (that is currently a lottery pick) for Patches, not on us to disprove it.

In defence of us “Duck fans”, the belief that “we” have that Steel isn’t available is founded on sound logic based on GMBM’s track-record (he’s never moved a top prospects for a player, let alone 2), we actually need Steel to replace Getzlaf eventually i.e. he’s not an expendable asset, we have other issues to address (namely Bieksa), and the fact that we’re not in a playoff position to even exploit the addition of Patches. Sorry to bring your fantasy crashing down, but this is the reality of the situation.


The difference is that any kind of trade on this board is a proposal, a "what if" scenario (What would a Pacioretty-to-Anaheim trade look like? What would be a fair return according to me?), while Ducks fans make claims and treat them like God's truth without having anything but past experience to back it up.
Feb. 7, 2018 at 5:09 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 462
Quoting: Campa96
The difference is that any kind of trade on this board is a proposal, a "what if" scenario (What would a Pacioretty-to-Anaheim trade look like? What would be a fair return according to me?), while Ducks fans make claims and treat them like God's truth without having anything but past experience to back it up.


Yeah, “what would be fair according to YOU”. We don’t have to agree that it’s fair. Moreover, what is fair and what isn’t fair is based not only on the value of the players involved in the deal, but also team needs. We reject this proposal because it doesn’t meet our team needs (we need Steel more than Patches). We don’t really care if it meets yours.

The reason why the claims of Duck fans come across as “god’s truthes” is because they are based on such solid logic that they might as well be. For example, if I made a proposal to you of Gibson for your 2018 1st, I’m pretty sure you, along with every other MTL fan, would say “no, never going happen”. “Why are you speaking like it’s god’s truth?”... errrr, because MTL doesn’t need a GT and their pick is going to be very high. It’s a deal that just will never happen... well, it might, but the likelihood is so low that you’d be accurate in saying “never gonna happen”. The same applies to the proposal above (I’ve listed the reasoning as to why above).
Feb. 7, 2018 at 11:27 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 384
Quoting: mytduxfan
Pointless remark. I mean, if you want to play it like that, has anyone in the ANA organisation even acknowledged interest in Patches? Or even stated that top prospects are available? The burden of proof is on you to prove that GMBM is even entertaining the idea of moving not 1, but 2 top prospects + a 1st (that is currently a lottery pick) for Patches, not on us to disprove it.

In defence of us “Duck fans”, the belief that “we” have that Steel isn’t available is founded on sound logic based on GMBM’s track-record (he’s never moved a top prospects for a player, let alone 2), we actually need Steel to replace Getzlaf eventually i.e. he’s not an expendable asset, we have other issues to address (namely Bieksa), and the fact that we’re not in a playoff position to even exploit the addition of Patches. Sorry to bring your fantasy crashing down, but this is the reality of the situation.



“A buddy who knows someone” = not a legitimate source. The use of the word “apparently” = an assertion based on little/no evidence.



Fine, you keep him. Steel isn’t available and we are not even in a playoff spot to need him.



You, my friend, get it. If this is the price of Patches, I have a hard time seeing Patches moved. Personally, I don’t think MTL is that committed to the rebuild (probably more of a retool). If I have misjudged that and they are, then Patches will he moved at the TDL, but for either a similar package not containing a top C prospect or just a lesser package.


It's probably a big factor in the trade.. Anaheim sucks right now lost to the habs 5-2. It doesn't make sense for Anaheim to make this trade unless they turn things around.
Feb. 8, 2018 at 3:31 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 462
Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
It's probably a big factor in the trade.. Anaheim sucks right now lost to the habs 5-2. It doesn't make sense for Anaheim to make this trade unless they turn things around.


Exactly, if we can’t even beat a bottom-feeder team like MTL, we’ve got no business going out and buying at the TDL. Keep Steel, keep the 1st, and hope we make it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll