SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Purcell

Created by: WALaxer19
Team: 2015-16 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 29, 2016
Published: Jan. 29, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
EDM
  1. Baun, Kyle
  2. Bickell, Bryan
  3. Rundblad, David
Additional Details:
2016 1st round pick
2017 4th round pick
Buyouts
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$71,400,000$60,689,920$750,000$4,707,500$10,710,080
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 6
$812,500$812,500 (Performance Bonus$2,800,000$3M)
LW
UFA - 2
$3,283,333$3,283,333
C, LW
UFA - 1
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$175,000$175K)
C
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$975,000$975,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$575,000$575,000
C
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$562,500$562,500
LW
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1
$587,500$587,500
G
UFA - 2
$667,500$667,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LD
UFA - 2
$600,000$600,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
RD
UFA - 1
$1,130,625$1,130,625
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 29, 2016 at 8:04 p.m.
#1
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,854
Likes: 10,091
I hate to say it, but you almost need to trade away a D Prospect. I'm not sure at this point EDM wants a late 1st draft pick. They have all the forwards they need up in the NHL and somehow don't have too many quality D prospects. You may have to give up TVR or Pokka, but I think that's just too much for a rental.
Jan. 29, 2016 at 9:30 p.m.
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,251
Likes: 23,113
Hate to disturb the discussion between knowledgable Hawk fans but.....is Purcell a difference maker for the Hawks this year? Might be better to save your trade ammo for someone that is really needed (and better), if at all.
Jan. 29, 2016 at 9:50 p.m.
#3
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,854
Likes: 10,091
Quoting: palhal
Hate to disturb the discussion between knowledgable Hawk fans but.....is Purcell a difference maker for the Hawks this year? Might be better to save your trade ammo for someone that is really needed (and better), if at all.


Agree
Jan. 30, 2016 at 4:10 p.m.
#4
masterown35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2015
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Quoting: palhal
Hate to disturb the discussion between knowledgable Hawk fans but.....is Purcell a difference maker for the Hawks this year? Might be better to save your trade ammo for someone that is really needed (and better), if at all.


Plus the fact that they don't have a 2nd round pick for the upcoming draft, trading away a 1st rounder would be a bad idea. First 50 picks according to the rankings on NHL.com seem to be loaded with dmen and the hawks could use another d prospect going forward with Pokka being there only promising prospect right now.

@exo2769: With what I just said, being that the draft seems to have a lot of dmen in the top 50, I'm sure Edmonton would use that pick to draft one, but again, can't see the hawks giving up a 1st without having a 2nd rounder. Not only that, but the hawks are short on d prospects. Pokka being their best, Forsling likely being their 2nd best and I really don't see anything promising coming from him.
Jan. 30, 2016 at 9:41 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 611
Don't like having to take back Runblad & Bickell because of their salary & term but the rest of the pieces in the deal are acceptable if not great returns.

One of the more intriguing trades I've seen on here, kudos! Would be interesting to see.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll