SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What The Flames Should Do

Created by: ekpaul87
Team: 2018-19 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 20, 2018
Published: Apr. 20, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don't think the Hamonic fit has been good in Calgary, but he could be a very good fit beside a guy like Morgan Rielly in Toronto. My preference would be to move TJ Brodie back to the right side with Giordano, where he had his best years, then have Hamilton anchor a pairing with a natural left side defender, someone fairly cheap in UFA like Thomas Hickey.

I signed Hickey, Kulak and Pateryn to provide a bit of a buffer for injuries and the development of Andersson, Valimaki, Kylington and Fox over the next couple of years. If any of them exceed expectations and are ready to step in immediately, the older guys can play 3rd pairing or be healthy scratched if needed.

The return on Hamonic nets Calgary a young winger with good scoring upside (scored a ton in junior and the AHL) and two guys who haven't quite been able to crack the Leafs roster, but might be able to get in with Calgary.

In the bottom 6, it's time to stop playing the overpaid veterans who are too slow, and turn it over to the kids - Mangiapane, Jankowski, Foo, Dube, etc. There's tons of cap space to make a few veteran UFA one year signings if needed, but I don't think it's necessary.

If, and it's a big if, John Tavares becomes available, the Flames should be in heavily on him. If they do manage to sign him, some more significant moves can be made to accommodate, but I think it's unlikely they actually get him signed.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,800,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
  1. 2019 4th round pick (BUF)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CAR
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$80,000,000$60,843,733$0$2,035,000$19,156,267

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 4
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 5
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 6
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$1,950,000$1,950,000
C
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$705,000$705,000 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LD
UFA - 4
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
UFA - 2
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 20, 2018 at 1:55 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 602
Welcome to Buffalo Mr. Stone enjoy the chicken wings and beef on weck (hint extra hot and extra horseradish).
ekpaul87 liked this.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 2:27 p.m.
#2
jcambers
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 688
Likes: 118
Why trade Hamonic?! He's not a big point-getter, but he was one of the most solid D-man last year and his current AAV is incredible. If we're going to trade a 3/4 d-man, Brodie has much more value.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 2:29 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1,512
Toronto accepts. Thanks.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 3:13 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 894
Likes: 195
Quoting: jcambers
Why trade Hamonic?! He's not a big point-getter, but he was one of the most solid D-man last year and his current AAV is incredible. If we're going to trade a 3/4 d-man, Brodie has much more value.


I think Brodie's skating ability and offensive upside is a better fit for the style I'd like to see the Flames play. He has also played well with Giordano, and as incredible as Gio/Hamilton are together, I'd like to see them each run a pair so the top 4 is even better.

I think it's more likely that they move Brodie than Hamonic, but I would prefer to keep Brodie.
Jerry liked this.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 4:49 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 6
Quoting: ekpaul87
I think Brodie's skating ability and offensive upside is a better fit for the style I'd like to see the Flames play. He has also played well with Giordano, and as incredible as Gio/Hamilton are together, I'd like to see them each run a pair so the top 4 is even better.

I think it's more likely that they move Brodie than Hamonic, but I would prefer to keep Brodie.


Agreed. Now I am a big Brodie guy so I may be biased but I am hesitant to move him. His game really regressed under Gulutzan and I would be very interested to see how he plays under a new coach. If he is still no good, then trade him I guess.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 5:01 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 894
Likes: 195
Quoting: Jerry
Agreed. Now I am a big Brodie guy so I may be biased but I am hesitant to move him. His game really regressed under Gulutzan and I would be very interested to see how he plays under a new coach. If he is still no good, then trade him I guess.


I would completely agree, and trading him now would be selling way low. But I still think he's better suited to playing on the right side, and I don't think there's space to have Hamilton, Brodie, Hamonic and Andersson all on the right, so someone has to go (far less Stone). Maybe trading Andersson for Daniel Sprong or something like that is the way to go, but even at $3.875 per for Hamonic, that gets super expensive for a third pairing guy. I also think he has pretty high trade value to someone like the Leafs who are paper thin on the right side and a coach like Babcock who loves those gritty vets.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 5:48 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 76
Likes: 6
Quoting: ekpaul87
I would completely agree, and trading him now would be selling way low. But I still think he's better suited to playing on the right side, and I don't think there's space to have Hamilton, Brodie, Hamonic and Andersson all on the right, so someone has to go (far less Stone). Maybe trading Andersson for Daniel Sprong or something like that is the way to go, but even at $3.875 per for Hamonic, that gets super expensive for a third pairing guy. I also think he has pretty high trade value to someone like the Leafs who are paper thin on the right side and a coach like Babcock who loves those gritty vets.


I too think Brodie plays better on the right side. However, if you remember when Gio went down in the first playoff year, Brodie played the left side with Engelland and played well there (more evidence he and Gulutzan were not a fit). But I do like him on the right side better. I would do Andersson for Sprong, trading from a position of strength for a much needed RW. The one thing with Hamonic is that he is a character guy, which is something CGY desperately needs. The cap situation isn't too concerning for me since it is going up next year and the Flames top guys are locked in at very good cap hits. For the right offer (i.e. something similar to what we traded to NYI value wise) I would trade Hamonic.
ekpaul87 liked this.
Apr. 20, 2018 at 7:31 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 200
Likes: 20
Why not move one of the D prospects that won't crack the line up instead of Hamonic?
I like Leivo and Brown, but I think we can get them at a better price.
Apr. 23, 2018 at 10:05 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 894
Likes: 195
Quoting: DarkMatta
Why not move one of the D prospects that won't crack the line up instead of Hamonic?
I like Leivo and Brown, but I think we can get them at a better price.


I think the prospects all have higher upside than Hamonic. We know exactly what he is, and he's good, but he's the kind of player who is going to have a hard time keeping up with the speed of the game in a couple of years. I'd prefer to have the younger, great skating, puck moving guys who can play the game the way it's going.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll