SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Blueprint - this is it guys!!!

Created by: Caniac555
Team: 2018-19 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: May 19, 2018
Published: May 21, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
1. Draft Svechnikov #2 Overall
2. N.Hanifin agrees to 2 year bridge deal (3.75M)
3. E.Lindholm agrees to 4 year $4.5M deal
4. Zykov agrees to 2 year $1.5M deal.
5. Van Riemsdyk stays and solidifies 3rd line RD spot with a 3 year $2M deal.

Trades -

Draft picks could be an issue, but here is the summary;

In - a top Goalie, Center, a RHD replacement for Faulk, and a solid bottom 6 checking line player with versatility.

Other Moves;
Nordstrom retained and agrees to a slight raise in salary, 2 year deal, and becomes a trade asset.
Wallmark signs 2 way 2 year deal and competes for a roster spot in NHL.
Sign Cole as a pairing on the 3rd line, and Manning as 7th D
There would be some AHL re-signings too

As the cap goes up, and some contracts come off the books - we are prepared to re-sign Aho and Teuvo.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,750,000
4$4,500,000
2$1,500,000
2$925,000
3$2,000,000
2$1,500,000
2$1,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Svechnikov, Andrei
3$925,000
2$2,500,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Myers, Tyler
Additional Details:
Rights to RFA Lowry
WPG
  1. Fleury, Haydn
  2. Rask, Victor
  3. 2018 2nd round pick (CAR)
2.
CAR
  1. O'Reilly, Ryan
  2. 2019 3rd round pick (BUF)
BUF
  1. Faulk, Justin
  2. Nordström, Joakim
  3. 2019 2nd round pick (CAR)
3.
CAR
  1. Holtby, Braden
  2. 2019 3rd round pick (WSH)
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (WSH)
WSH
  1. Helvig, Jeremy
  2. Skinner, Jeff ($2,862,500 retained)
  3. 2019 1st round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
50% 2018 retained salary
Carolina 1st is lottery protected - deferred to 2020
Washington keeps 2020 3rd if Skinner doesn’t re-sign
Carolina throws in Goalie prospect too
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VGK
2019
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CGY
2020
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$78,000,000$69,492,500$0$920,000$8,507,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 1
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 5
$2,860,000$2,860,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$887,500$887,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Svechnikov, Andrei
$925,000$925,000
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 6
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C
UFA - 3
$894,167$894,167
RW
RFA - 4
$746,667$746,667 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
UFA - 7
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 6
$6,100,000$6,100,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD
UFA - 6
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
$4,150,000$4,150,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 21, 2018 at 4:09 p.m.
#1
dbudz12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 55
Likes: 6
I like the trades, but Holtby may not be the best idea. You don't want to have over 10 mil in cap hits just for your goalies especially with a young and upcoming core like Carolina has. Theyre going to need to sign these guys long term.
May 21, 2018 at 4:27 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,804
Likes: 3,612
100% agree - Darling is prime buyout candidate next season once Nedeljkovic is ready for NHL.

Quoting: dbudz12
I like the trades, but Holtby may not be the best idea. You don't want to have over 10 mil in cap hits just for your goalies especially with a young and upcoming core like Carolina has. Theyre going to need to sign these guys long term.
May 21, 2018 at 4:37 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 602
GMBots says NO ROR for you!!!!!

GMBots states that is just not enough for ROR...... Nordstrom is a fine individual but as far as hockey goes a 26yo winger who puts up 10-15 points a season is not what the Sabres need.... we have plenty of them as it stands right now.... Bailey, Baptiste, Larsson, Girgensons, and so on and so on.....

So basically he is a throw in warm body to this trade..... therefore it is ROR for a top pair D with 2 years of term for ROR.....

I do not see any team willing to trade ROR straight up for Faulk..... go fish!!!!
May 21, 2018 at 4:43 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,804
Likes: 3,612
What would your counter be?

Quoting: wagsnags
GMBots says NO ROR for you!!!!!

GMBots states that is just not enough for ROR...... Nordstrom is a fine individual but as far as hockey goes a 26yo winger who puts up 10-15 points a season is not what the Sabres need.... we have plenty of them as it stands right now.... Bailey, Baptiste, Larsson, Girgensons, and so on and so on.....

So basically he is a throw in warm body to this trade..... therefore it is ROR for a top pair D with 2 years of term for ROR.....

I do not see any team willing to trade ROR straight up for Faulk..... go fish!!!!
May 21, 2018 at 4:43 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,578
Likes: 7,110
Quoting: wagsnags
GMBots says NO ROR for you!!!!!

GMBots states that is just not enough for ROR...... Nordstrom is a fine individual but as far as hockey goes a 26yo winger who puts up 10-15 points a season is not what the Sabres need.... we have plenty of them as it stands right now.... Bailey, Baptiste, Larsson, Girgensons, and so on and so on.....

So basically he is a throw in warm body to this trade..... therefore it is ROR for a top pair D with 2 years of term for ROR.....

I do not see any team willing to trade ROR straight up for Faulk..... go fish!!!!


Funny, i was about to say that's way more than the canes should be giving up for Faulk. I'm not sure if you're unfamiliar with how hard it is to get a top pairing d man. ROR as you call him isn't exactly elite.
May 21, 2018 at 4:49 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 602
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Funny, i was about to say that's way more than the canes should be giving up for Faulk. I'm not sure if you're unfamiliar with how hard it is to get a top pairing d man. ROR as you call him isn't exactly elite.


Well 2 years of Faulk is a risk I am not worth taking on. The Sabres are at least 2 years away from contending..... they have a solid core of young Dmen.... Risto, Dahlin, Guhle, Pilut, Borgen, Nelson if they elect to sign Scandella & McCabe after 18/19 season add them to the mix.

Yes I do realize that a top pair D are a difficult commodity to obtain..... so are legit #2C that play the PP, PK, All Critical Defensive Zone Faceoffs & high number of minutes a game.....

You are not going to convince me that the Sabres should trade ROR for Faulk straight up which is what this deal being offered is...... ROR has more value to the development of my core offensive players than 2 years of Faulk.
May 21, 2018 at 4:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 602
Quoting: Mikemathis555
What would your counter be?


Here is what I think would work for both sides:

Carolina receives from Buffalo:

ROR

for

Faulk
Kuokanen
2nd Round Pick in 2020

*If Faulk does not sign in Buffalo after the 2019/2020 season when his contract is up Carolina sends a 3rd Round pick in 2021 to Buffalo.
May 21, 2018 at 5:28 p.m.
#8
Eichel Tower
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 4,716
Likes: 2,441
Quoting: wagsnags
GMBots says NO ROR for you!!!!!

GMBots states that is just not enough for ROR...... Nordstrom is a fine individual but as far as hockey goes a 26yo winger who puts up 10-15 points a season is not what the Sabres need.... we have plenty of them as it stands right now.... Bailey, Baptiste, Larsson, Girgensons, and so on and so on.....

So basically he is a throw in warm body to this trade..... therefore it is ROR for a top pair D with 2 years of term for ROR.....

I do not see any team willing to trade ROR straight up for Faulk..... go fish!!!!


Quoting: wagsnags
Here is what I think would work for both sides:

Carolina receives from Buffalo:

ROR

for

Faulk
Kuokanen
2nd Round Pick in 2020

*If Faulk does not sign in Buffalo after the 2019/2020 season when his contract is up Carolina sends a 3rd Round pick in 2021 to Buffalo.


Five stars for trading for O'Reilly

I like this trade:
Created by: Caniac2000
CAR trades Faulk, J, Rask, V, Lorentz, S, Roy, N & 2019 1st to BUF for O'Reilly, R, Lehner, R & 2019 2nd
maybe not at the beginning of the season but soon:
Dahlin with Ristolainen
Scandella with Faulk
McCabe with Bogosian
That would be a great defense
Rask and Larsson as the 3rd/4th line centers would win many more face offs than they lose.
May 21, 2018 at 6:35 p.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,578
Likes: 7,110
Quoting: wagsnags
Well 2 years of Faulk is a risk I am not worth taking on. The Sabres are at least 2 years away from contending..... they have a solid core of young Dmen.... Risto, Dahlin, Guhle, Pilut, Borgen, Nelson if they elect to sign Scandella & McCabe after 18/19 season add them to the mix.

Yes I do realize that a top pair D are a difficult commodity to obtain..... so are legit #2C that play the PP, PK, All Critical Defensive Zone Faceoffs & high number of minutes a game.....

You are not going to convince me that the Sabres should trade ROR for Faulk straight up which is what this deal being offered is...... ROR has more value to the development of my core offensive players than 2 years of Faulk.


One has a great contract, one has a not so great contract. Guess which ones which.

I honestly think the Sabres would have to include at least a 2nd with ROR to get Faulk. Dude has off ice issues, locker room issues, is a streaky scorer, and has a long term contract that is probably a bit on the high side. Does he even have his drivers license back yet? Buffalo wants to move "ROR," ROR wants to move. I think Faulk for ROR and a 2nd is a really good deal for buffalo, borderline steal.
May 21, 2018 at 6:50 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 602
Quoting: Bcarlo25
One has a great contract, one has a not so great contract. Guess which ones which.

I honestly think the Sabres would have to include at least a 2nd with ROR to get Faulk. Dude has off ice issues, locker room issues, is a streaky scorer, and has a long term contract that is probably a bit on the high side. Does he even have his drivers license back yet? Buffalo wants to move "ROR," ROR wants to move. I think Faulk for ROR and a 2nd is a really good deal for buffalo, borderline steal.


Well to answer your question.... yes he does have his drivers license as that case (for hitting a Tim Horton's with his pick up truck) was resolved...... I am not sure where you are getting your information from that he has locker room issues..... to the contrary he is actually a locker room positive.... never throws a teammate under the bus.... always shoulders the blame even when it is not his fault...... you listened to one interview at exit time where he spoke honestly about being tired of losing..... never once has he said he wants out of Buffalo..... in the most recent interview during the World Championships (he may have been Canada's best player in that tournament just saying) on TSN he emphatically said he has no desire to leave Buffalo he wants to be in Buffalo & he wants to be part of the solution to turning the franchise in the right direction.

I do not know the man personally so he can be saying the right thing at the right time.

There is not a snowballs chance in hell that the Sabres trade ROR and a 2nd Round pick for Faulk....... keep hitting whatever you are hitting we will agree to disagree.
May 22, 2018 at 3:55 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,804
Likes: 3,612
With all due respect wagsnags - my proposed trade was ROR + 3rd for Faulk + 2nd and Nordstrom. I realize you didn't like Nordstrom - just a thought.

Quoting: wagsnags
Well to answer your question.... yes he does have his drivers license as that case (for hitting a Tim Horton's with his pick up truck) was resolved...... I am not sure where you are getting your information from that he has locker room issues..... to the contrary he is actually a locker room positive.... never throws a teammate under the bus.... always shoulders the blame even when it is not his fault...... you listened to one interview at exit time where he spoke honestly about being tired of losing..... never once has he said he wants out of Buffalo..... in the most recent interview during the World Championships (he may have been Canada's best player in that tournament just saying) on TSN he emphatically said he has no desire to leave Buffalo he wants to be in Buffalo & he wants to be part of the solution to turning the franchise in the right direction.

I do not know the man personally so he can be saying the right thing at the right time.

There is not a snowballs chance in hell that the Sabres trade ROR and a 2nd Round pick for Faulk....... keep hitting whatever you are hitting we will agree to disagree.
May 22, 2018 at 8:28 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 602
Quoting: Mikemathis555
With all due respect wagsnags - my proposed trade was ROR + 3rd for Faulk + 2nd and Nordstrom. I realize you didn't like Nordstrom - just a thought.


Mike with me you never have to state 'with all due respect' I am all good.... i realize your trade had other aspects.... I am sorry that your published team was sidetracked with my comments to and from Bcarlo.....

My point was simply that if GMBots thinks that Nordstrom is just another 3rd or 4th liner his organization is full of this type therefore that specific player has virtually no value when you are considering a deal...... so if you add him or take him out of the deal it has zero sum gain to the overall deal...... IMO ONLY I value Nordstrom as a non factor in the deal so then it comes down to ROR & 3rd Round Pick in 2019 vs Faulk and a 2nd Round Pick in 2019......

Let's look at the picks.... the Sabres in 18/19 probably finish anywhere from 25th to 31st..... Carolina probably finishes between 10th to 15th...... As a result Carolina's 2nd Round pick in 2019 draft will be #52 - #56 where as the Buffalo Sabres 3rd Round Pick in 2019 will be #62 to #67...... so the range of draft picks is min of 10 total picks to a max of 15 picks...... to me there is very little value between those 2 picks.

The last piece is to look at ROR vs Faulk..... both players have legitimate talent in their respective positions..... that is not up for debate.... you would not want ROR if he did not have value.... Faulk would not be sought after if he did not offer value to another club...... ROR's contract I do not see as a negative I see it as a positive due to an increasing salary cap and there is not a no trade clause to worry about if you want to move him at anytime..... In Faulk I will get his services for 2 years at the end of the 19/20 season he can walk..... if I deal for this type of player I have to believe that my organization and team can convince this player to sign back on..... there is the rub..... I do not think the Sabres are competitive this year (18/19) I think they are respectable and a potential playoff team in 19/20..... therefore I do not know how the Sabres convince Faulk to stay on.

I hope this clarifies where my thinking was in relation to your trade.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll