SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Taking a stab at a Karlsson trade

Created by: SankFeravalli
Team: 2018-19 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 7, 2018
Published: Jul. 7, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Let’s be honest - no one is really sure what this deal will look like. There are a lot of moving parts, especially regarding all the salary being moved from both Ottawa and Tampa. Here’s my thought process for the two trades.

Tampa-Ottawa
The Senators get back Sergachev, Foote, Gourde, and a 1st round pick for Karlsson. They swap Barre-Broulet for Chlapik in exchange for taking on Ryan’s contract. Drake Batherson and Alex Barre-Broulet played together in junior, and Chlapik will the piece Tampa uses to flip Ryan.

Tampa-Montreal
The Habs take on a lot of salary, but they’re rewarded with Chlapik and Raddysh. Chlapik - a coveted center - can play right away, and Raddysh is pretty close. Tampa gets back a cheap but effective forward on an expiring contract.

What are your thoughts?
Trades
1.
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$76,742,114$142,947$365,000$2,757,886
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 5
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
$4,766,667$4,766,667
RW
UFA - 1
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 6
$686,667$686,667 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$677,500$677,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
$4,700,000$4,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$1,150,000$1,150,000
G
UFA - 2
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
$865,000$865,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 7, 2018 at 10:09 a.m.
#1
BigBeardBurns
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 535
If Montreal’s taking on cap idk if they want to give Byron up. If anything, they’d want a little more considering they r taking Ryan and Callahan. At 1st glance I thought Tampa would have no interest in trading both Sergachev and Foote, but I guess if they get EK...
As much as Tampa needs a 1 RHD, I realized they also lack depth up front, so we’ll see what happens. I like ur idea tho.
Jul. 7, 2018 at 10:14 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 324
Quoting: BigBeardBurns
If Montreal’s taking on cap idk if they want to give Byron up. If anything, they’d want a little more considering they r taking Ryan and Callahan. At 1st glance I thought Tampa would have no interest in trading both Sergachev and Foote, but I guess if they get EK...
As much as Tampa needs a 1 RHD, I realized they also lack depth up front, so we’ll see what happens. I like ur idea tho.


I definitely see your points. It’s so tough to figure this one out. Ottawa wants to move money, Tampa has to move money. The bold have a ton of prospects to give but do they want to clean out the cupboards entirely? They can keep paying in prospects and picks to get rid of salary and add players on decent contracts. I guess that’s why they’re the pros and we’re the arm-chair GMs lol. One thing I tried at first was having Gallagher come back to Tampa. He’s on a nice contract at 3.25x3yrs, and would give them some depth up front. But they would have to move Johnson, Miller, Palat, or Killorn to fit him in. That might not be a bad option though to save a little money for a comparable player.
BigBeardBurns liked this.
Jul. 7, 2018 at 10:41 a.m.
#3
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 3,759
I think point has to go to Ottawa instead of course.
Jul. 7, 2018 at 10:47 a.m.
#4
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,443
Likes: 3,402
Can’t see Montreal helping out two division rivals like that unless they really make it worth it, which they don’t. The two prospects are nice but that’s a lot of salary for a long time and a team rebuilding can’t afford to take that on. Especially with Carey and Webers contracts already being substantial.
Jul. 7, 2018 at 10:59 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 324
Quoting: Trickster
I think point has to go to Ottawa instead of course.


If I’m Ottawa, I’m asking for Sergachev, Point, and a 1st round pick. It seems simple enough, but the issue with including Point is that he’s on his ELC, and provides Tampa with cheap offense that allows them to add Karlsson and keep most of their team together for one more season. There’s also the potential that he signs a Kucherov-like bridge to give the bolts 2 or 3 more really good runs. HOWEVER (we can argue back and forth for eternity) the counter argument is that by trading Point, you maintain your prospect pipeline, and the opportunity for several young players to step in and provide that same impact on their ELCs.
Jul. 7, 2018 at 11:01 a.m.
#6
Go Bolts!!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 426
Likes: 153
Quoting: rtapp326
If I’m Ottawa, I’m asking for Sergachev, Point, and a 1st round pick. It seems simple enough, but the issue with including Point is that he’s on his ELC, and provides Tampa with cheap offense that allows them to add Karlsson and keep most of their team together for one more season. There’s also the potential that he signs a Kucherov-like bridge to give the bolts 2 or 3 more really good runs. HOWEVER (we can argue back and forth for eternity) the counter argument is that by trading Point, you maintain your prospect pipeline, and the opportunity for several young players to step in and provide that same impact on their ELCs.


Any deal for Karlsson ends with Brayden Point, all other prospects are on the table though. Subtracting point from the 2C really hinders the Bolts, he was the best forward for the Lightning in the playoffs outside game 1 against Boston and he is still on his ELC this year so they can ice the best possible team for a cup run if they got Karlsson. If they want Point then the Lightning are better off staying pat and trying to get Karlsson next year as a UFA if he doesn't re-sign anywhere.
Jul. 7, 2018 at 11:20 a.m.
#7
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 3,759
I'm sure someone else trade for Karlsson and resign him no problem.

Nothing says he only has to go Tampa only.
Jul. 8, 2018 at 7:17 a.m.
#8
BigBeardBurns
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 535
Quoting: Trickster
I'm sure someone else trade for Karlsson and resign him no problem.

Nothing says he only has to go Tampa only.


Yeah with all the stuff holding this trade back and with the complexness of it, they may be able to pull it through, but at this point I doubt he goes to Tampa. Ottawa needs to go to someone that at least has the money for next year.
Trickster liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll