if reports are true about NYR being his top destination, i don't know if the rangers do this. don't get me wrong, its an amazing deal and i would accept it personally if I was the rangers GM.
Panarin is a UFA next year, like i said previously, if the rangers are his top destination and they offer him a good deal all is well.
The rangers aren't competing this year (without a major move on defense) and while they are getting significant assets in milano and the 1st rounder here is an alternative:
Sign Panarin without giving up assets
Trade Hayes for a good defenseman either during season or at the draft (got my eyes on trouba, Hayes+DeAngelo i would do in a heartbeat)
Trade zucc for a 1st rounder or good prospect at the deadline
While the rangers are giving up and getting in return similar values, trouba and a 1st for the rangers is better than milano and a 1st/prospect. that's just my perspective.
overall,
Trouba>Milano+1st (i.e. wpg would most likely decline)
Trouba+1st (from potential zucc trade)> trouba (if milano and 1st was accepted for trouba)
Like i said, i have no problems with the deal you posted AT ALL. i would love for it to happen. i would just like my scenario better