SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Opening Night

Created by: Cs_7
Team: 2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 20, 2018
Published: Sep. 20, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,500,000
Trades
TOR
  1. 2020 4th round pick (NYI)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$67,658,333$2,550,000$5,400,000$11,841,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$650,000$650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$650,000$650,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:27 p.m.
#1
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,078
Likes: 3,772
Nylander is getting definatly less than 6.5 per
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:27 p.m.
#2
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,078
Likes: 3,772
Nylander is getting definatly less than 6.5 per
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:37 p.m.
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,251
Likes: 23,110
Five years is a term the Leafs don't want. It leads right into UFA. So more years, or a 1-4 bridge. I'm not a fan of Carrick, but the Leafs shouldn't be giving him away as he might be needed this year. Holl is more likely candidate 8th Dman as he would likely clearly waivers
GenXHockey liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:37 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Trickster
Nylander is getting definatly less than 6.5 per


Definitely, because you have Dubas on speed dial? No, both sides want a long term deal so we are talking 7 or 8 years and that term will increase the cap hit. Which isn't at all a problem either, he'll more than earn whatever contract he gets.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:38 p.m.
#5
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
I think this could work but we would have to see how gardiner handles the tougher assignments. This leaves less juggling to do when we need to rest hainsey. We could simply insert borgman or Rosen.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:45 p.m.
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,251
Likes: 23,110
Quoting: Jamiepo
I think this could work but we would have to see how gardiner handles the tougher assignments. This leaves less juggling to do when we need to rest hainsey. We could simply insert borgman or Rosen.


I really think the pairing of Gardiner and Reilly is so unfounded. It's this illusion of creating of "a # 1pairing". The offence of Gardiner and Reilly needed to split up into two pairs. Gardiner is not trusted to be PK, I gotta think he needs an solid Dman beside on regular shifts....either Zaitsev or Ozzie.
Hainsey did very well with Reilly last year and since the Leafs seem to have to enough NHL good LHD, I imagine Hainsey has to play on the right side. Let's hope Babcock doesn't overwork him like last year's rented mule.
GenXHockey liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 3:01 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: palhal
Five years is a term the Leafs don't want. It leads right into UFA. So more years, or a 1-4 bridge. I'm not a fan of Carrick, but the Leafs shouldn't be giving him away as he might be needed this year. Holl is more likely candidate 8th Dman as he would likely clearly waivers


If Carrick ever got to play regular minutes he'd do exactly what he did last night. He won't be the star of the game ever but he'll never be a problem. He has a very good stick and is a bull dog. I'd play him over Hainsey on the right side to be honest. Hainsey is good in front of the net and is a great PK guy but he's not the fastest anymore and he's on his weak side and that does make it hard for him to press the play up the right hand side of the ice. I think Hainsey would be far better on the 3rd pairing left side.

I was also impressed with Holl, he's another guy that is just solid. Won't blow you away with any part of his game but he's just smart all around (At least that's how he looked in the small sample size I've seen him in.)

Ozhiganov is also looking pretty good. I really don't think TO needs to make any moves on the back end, they need to just play better team defence.
Cs_7 liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 3:17 p.m.
#8
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: palhal
I really think the pairing of Gardiner and Reilly is so unfounded. It's this illusion of creating of "a # 1pairing". The offence of Gardiner and Reilly needed to split up into two pairs. Gardiner is not trusted to be PK, I gotta think he needs an solid Dman beside on regular shifts....either Zaitsev or Ozzie.
Hainsey did very well with Reilly last year and since the Leafs seem to have to enough NHL good LHD, I imagine Hainsey has to play on the right side. Let's hope Babcock doesn't overwork him like last year's rented mule.


It would be an experiment for sure, I’m not a hater of Gardiner and I think he was pretty good defensively last season. My issue is trying to get hainsey som rest this year and get Borgman into the lineup a bit. Now Injuries may play a part in doing that granted. If there were a way to get Hainsey back to the left side this would work out well for when he is rested. Yes Holl and carrick can both fill in on the right but I don’t see them as being part of the future. I think that Borgman or Rosen will be needed for the next few years till we se if sandin is ready.
Cs_7 liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 3:23 p.m.
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,251
Likes: 23,110
Quoting: Jamiepo
It would be an experiment for sure, I’m not a hater of Gardiner and I think he was pretty good defensively last season. My issue is trying to get hainsey som rest this year and get Borgman into the lineup a bit. Now Injuries may play a part in doing that granted. If there were a way to get Hainsey back to the left side this would work out well for when he is rested. Yes Holl and carrick can both fill in on the right but I don’t see them as being part of the future. I think that Borgman or Rosen will be needed for the next few years till we se if sandin is ready.


I was a fan of Borgman last year. If he deserves to be in top 6, maybe so switching to the right side by some one is necessary. You and me are kinda optimistic about the Leafs next year even wiihout Gardiner and Hainsey. Borgman, Rosen, Liljegren...maybe Sandin could be ready.
Cs_7 liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 4:09 p.m.
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: palhal
I was a fan of Borgman last year. If he deserves to be in top 6, maybe so switching to the right side by some one is necessary. You and me are kinda optimistic about the Leafs next year even wiihout Gardiner and Hainsey. Borgman, Rosen, Liljegren...maybe Sandin could be ready.


I’m not opposed to dermott switching over either and pairing up with gardiner so long as he keeps progressing how he has. I didn’t get to watch the second game against Ottawa just the condensed version. Apparently Rosen did well too. Borgman in that first game was fantastic. I would rather see hainsey’s down time going to the left side so we can have that sorted out, I’m sure liljegren will get some starts on the right but I would really like to be patient with him and just make sure he is ready to go next year. Next season:

Reilly/Zaitsev
Dermott/liljegren
Borgman/Ozhiganov

I feel really good about this. We have been drafting well in the later parts of the 1st 2nd and even third rounds. If we can keep developing the future looks bright, even with our offence. As these kids move up we can keep the cupboards full of prospects and picks by moving out other players that aren’t part of our core. It’s beneficial to farm players rather than chase them in FA or trades.

I think with our offence generated by the blue line and some good team defence coming back from the forwards it makes for a very potent two way system.
palhal and Cs_7 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll