Quoting: pharrow
ok you explain to me how JT is worth more than Crosby or Malkin and I'll be glad to answer that for you. He's not. Period. That's how it works. It's not about getting paid based on what other players make. If so there wouldn't be a player in this league making more than 8.7 million. As over the last 4-5 years there has been no one better over that time span. yet those big money contracts flowed out.
Matthews is gonna make his, period. He's gonna get paid. He's gonna make over 11, he's probably looking at McDavid money. That's what happens when the cap goes up for 3 years or whatever between contracts.
Yes, He will be looking at McDavid money, you always fail to remember the player doesn't get what he asks for. The team (which you never take into account) will be looking for Seguin money, that was just signed a few weeks ago now, are you saying Matthews is over three and a half million dollars better than Seguin, even factoring cap inflation? I'll give you a hint, the answer is no. Tavares is a cap on Matthews aav, 8@11.
Quoting: PuckPal
So what your saying even though with our cap space available we a offersheet proof just like we were this year so you think the leafs are handing him a blank check? Matthews is a #1 centre but he hasn't had a McDavid like season and when you look at his stat lines he is a Stamkos Tavares type not McDavid. So explain to me how is he worth more than 11 million...oh thats right just because right
Just taging puck into this as it is also his convo.
You know, you have "GM in the making" as your tag line, but every time you open your mouth (figuratively ofc), you prove to the world that you are completely inept on the topic of contracts and you utterly fail to recognize the factors involved in inking one. I know I have tried to explain it to you and I am sure others have too, Yet you persist in your utter failure to understand anything relating to the topic on which you speak, and continue to use the same tired arguments that have been disproved time and time again. I think my question can be summed up as the following: How do you entirely miss the fact that you cherry pick your information that you then use to create your opinions, and when pointed out, begin to argue endlessly with others, utilizing the same points that were just disproved?