Quoting: AgentWebster
LOL stop being so dramatic because Carlo is a FAR better defender then leaky Krug.
Never said he wasn't lol.
Quote:
I'm sure we have different options on what a Defensemen main job is so call me crazy but I would think his number one job is to oooooooo I don't know maybe be a good defender? Who cares if Krug can put the puck in the net to only allow a goal on the other end.
Your opinion is the complete opposite of the way the NHL is going lol. Did you notice how eager teams were at this year draft to grab offensive minded d-men? Did you ever notice that the guy whose consider the best d-man in the game, Erik Karlsson is a whopping -44 for his career. Funny thing is though when it comes to UFA, he'll be very sought after. Like I said, you need a balance of guys who can defend and guys who can score, why do you think Carlo and Krug are paired together?
[/quote]Last year in the playoffs he was a -5. and look what it got us.[/quote]
Ya because the Bruins lack of secondary scoring had nothing to do with it lol. Hedman was a -4 in the playoffs, Burns was a -4, Josi a -4.
Again the +/- stat is such a useless stat lol.
Quote:
I believe Krug does have value to some team but not ours.
Boston's management disagrees lol
Quote:
McAvoy is a +23 in just two years while Krug is a +23 in 8 years so NO we don't trade McAvoy.
EXACTLY!! That's my point. You want to trade Krug because of a +/- but his GA/60 is better than McAvoy and you wouldn't trade McAvoy. Nobody takes +/- serious and that's the only thing you want to pin on Krug.