Trading one of the best offensive defensemen in the league for a 4th round pick...

Boston does not.

Ferland and a 4th for Krug? C’mon.

Brutal. Another idiot Bruins troll on this site. Can we get some quality posters please? There's like 3-4 on here.

So you’re jc8989bruin or whatever right?

Shocker another terrible ACGM where in the end its really Krug for Ferland. You're just re-arranging deck chairs on teh titanic at this point. There is only one other poster who was obsessed with trading Krug and I haven't seen them in a while....looks like you have a new account, but are posting the same old stuff.

To bad we can't trade fans between fanbases. Then again based on who post ACGM's for the B's, I'd imagine we'd take a massive hit just to move some of these "fans"

I definitely would like to see Krug traded And I do believe I have had him in every trade scenario that I have posted so I might be that other guy. I don’t like Krug because he’s a defensive liability and he is tied in last place for the team in +/-

I think this is just another account for that moron, JCBruins984738439843

He actually isn't tied for last place, Acciari has sole possession of that. Even still +/- is a terrible way to put a defensive value on a player. BTW Carlo is a -2, so I guess he's a defensively liability too. The difference with Carlo is he doesn't give you anywhere near the offensive output that Krug does. What makes a good defense is having guys that can defend and guys that can produce points. Again so far this season Krug accounts for nearly 40% of the defense production and he missed 11 of 30 games...

At ES, Krug's GA/60 is better than McAvoy's, does that mean we need to trade McAvoy too?

LOL stop being so dramatic because Carlo is a FAR better defender then leaky Krug. I'm sure we have different options on what a Defensemen main job is so call me crazy but I would think his number one job is to oooooooo I don't know maybe be a good defender? Who cares if Krug can put the puck in the net to only allow a goal on the other end. Last year in the playoffs he was a -5. and look what it got us. I believe Krug does have value to some team but not ours. McAvoy is a +23 in just two years while Krug is a +23 in 8 years so NO we don't trade McAvoy.

Never said he wasn't lol.



Your opinion is the complete opposite of the way the NHL is going lol. Did you notice how eager teams were at this year draft to grab offensive minded d-men? Did you ever notice that the guy whose consider the best d-man in the game, Erik Karlsson is a whopping -44 for his career. Funny thing is though when it comes to UFA, he'll be very sought after. Like I said, you need a balance of guys who can defend and guys who can score, why do you think Carlo and Krug are paired together?

[/quote]Last year in the playoffs he was a -5. and look what it got us.[/quote]

Ya because the Bruins lack of secondary scoring had nothing to do with it lol. Hedman was a -4 in the playoffs, Burns was a -4, Josi a -4.

Again the +/- stat is such a useless stat lol.



Boston's management disagrees lol



EXACTLY!! That's my point. You want to trade Krug because of a +/- but his GA/60 is better than McAvoy and you wouldn't trade McAvoy. Nobody takes +/- serious and that's the only thing you want to pin on Krug.

Why do you put so much weight into +/- ??? Really weird stat to hang your hat on. Both players have mega value to the Bruins. Also, OneMan knows his **** so I don't know why you're coming off like some snobby 14 year old. "oooooooo"? Really?

We have different options on what a Defensemen main job is that's all.

Okay but you need to stop thinking +/- is this important stat when it’s not lol