Thank you! I see a lot of rankings list and it's a lot of uninformed, biased hot takes. This is actually a great list that seems to perfectly sum up their skill. Good work
Thank you! I see a lot of rankings list and it's a lot of uninformed, biased hot takes. This is actually a great list that seems to perfectly sum up their skill. Good work
Thanks so much i appreciate it!
Just curious, could you suggest one player who maybe should be higher and one who should be lower in your opinion?
thanks appreciate it! i get bored at work sometimes lol....anybody you would change? one player who u think should be higher one lower?
I'm not sure what you're basing these rating on particularly but. Halak has played almost as well as Rask this year, Krug and McAvoy are both better then Hamilton.
I'm not sure what you're basing these rating on particularly but. Halak has played almost as well as Rask this year, Krug and McAvoy are both better then Hamilton.
may very well be true about Krug and Mcavoy but u obviously have a bias w your username...im gunna dig into the numbers on those 3 and consider changing....
who is better right now in your opinion between McAvoy and Krug?
Rask>Halak
rask has been pretty steady for years sure Halak has had a great season but hes still a backup and has bounced around from team to team i think his current rating of 82 is fair considering hes above other starters in the league like Martin Jones and Carter Hutton...Halak is an above average backup
may very well be true about Krug and Mcavoy but u obviously have a bias w your username...im gunna dig into the numbers on those 3 and consider changing....
who is better right now in your opinion between McAvoy and Krug?
Rask>Halak
rask has been pretty steady for years sure Halak has had a great season but hes still a backup and has bounced around from team to team i think his current rating of 82 is fair considering hes above other starters in the league like Martin jones and Carter Hutton...Halak is an above average backup
I'm only commenting on Bruins players not out of bias but because those are the ones I watch the most. I've watched Hamilton plenty enough to know I'd rather have Krug or McAvoy. They bring much different skills but if I had to pick one to play the whole game it would be McAvoy.
About Halak, you have Binnington and Hart higher and they've only played a few weeks, Raanta and Schneider hurt and awful for example. I chose not to comment on other teams players out of respect not favortism.
could you suggest one player who should be higher and one who should be lower in your opinion?
a few that might go one point up or one point down, but all in all its a very good list. I think Chabot could be a 84+ (Provorov level or better considering his age) similar guys with crazy high potential and have shown flashes of brilliance.
Some might argue Skinner is too high? 87 is an amazing score, and i like the player a lot.. but i worry that everyone rates him on this outstanding year and he may revert back to a good 2nd liner in the future.
Anders Lee is another guy like this. You put him at 84, which might close, but he is truly an amazing 1st line player and could rank closer to the high 80s.